|
|
Next MBPs
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Sometime between when Ivy Bridge ships and the second coming of Christ.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Standing on the shoulders of giants
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Germany, 51°51´51" N, 9°05´41" E
Status:
Offline
|
|
My first reaction: i would be p***** when the pro line drops the optical bay, but when i´m honest, mostly i´m only using it to watch DVDs. Hopefully the matte screens will return (not only as a BTO option).
|
Macintosh Quadra 950, Centris 610, Powermac 6100, iBook dual USB, Powerbook 667 DVI, Powerbook 867 DVI, MacBook Pro early 2011
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by mattyb
Why the Lounge?
Are you new here?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Tampa, Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
If Jobsian timing is honored, Macbooks are released nowhere close the the beginning of the school year, only to be sweetened with a free printer in August-September, after the recalls have been ironed out. So yeah, expect a Macbook after in October, with no Ivy Bridge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Land of Enchantment
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'll be majorly pissed if there is no regular HD option. I don't want to schlepp an external around for all my data and don't need almost instant boot, since I don't turn it off. And I won't spend $770 to get a 480 SSD.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm not a fan of the poor weight balance and sharp front edge of the MBA design. I'll continue to buy wintel laptops personally (like my last 11.6") if they convert the MBP form factor and don't address these issues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Tampa, Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
How would you feel if the MBP wound up with a lower resolution than an iPad?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Land of Enchantment
Status:
Offline
|
|
I thought the buzz was that the new MBPs are going to have retina. That way I could stop using 17" models and use the 15" one at high res.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by moonmonkey
Are you new here?
mattyb is right, why the Lounge? This clearly belongs in the Mac Notebooks forum.
Back on topic: although I don't expect Apple to quadruple the resolution (the current highr-res options gives you 1650x1050 pixels, 3300x2100 seems unfeasible), I do expect we'll see an ultra high-res 15" model that puts Lion's high-res functionality to good use.
|
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Truckee, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by jmiddel
I'll be majorly pissed if there is no regular HD option. I don't want to schlepp an external around for all my data and don't need almost instant boot, since I don't turn it off. And I won't spend $770 to get a 480 SSD.
Fast boot is not the point at all; the point is greatly reduced latency with all applications. Laptop HDDs perform poorly, so SSD is a very energy and cost effective way to improve laptop performance, by a lot.
Expect ( hope) that all new Macs have boot SSDs, with also a HDD option as a second internal drive on the higher-end boxes.
-Allen
(
Last edited by SierraDragon; Feb 12, 2012 at 05:15 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Truckee, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by The Godfather
How would you feel if the MBP wound up with a lower resolution than an iPad?
So what? Who cares? The MBP already has lower resolution than an iPhone. Each device should be optimized for its own purposes.
-Allen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by SierraDragon
So what? Who cares? The MBP already has lower resolution than an iPhone. Each device should be optimized for its own purposes.
One shouldn't forget about average working distances: if the eyes are farther from a screen, then one does not need 300 dpi to ensure text appears sharper.
|
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Land of Enchantment
Status:
Offline
|
|
SD, I agree. I see 2 categories of users. The first, needs this increase in speed, and are willing to settle for fewer features (optical, FW, Ethernet, huge size HDs) to get faster and very high-end performance, eg via Thunderbolt. This surely is the future, and I hope that we will have SSDs at $79 for 1 T (price of my pre Thailand flood 1T 2.5 Toshiba). In the meantime a second bunch of users need all the stuff excluded, because speed is not an issue, but versatility is. Eg, must I+ bring an external HD with me for data, of which I have a bunch? SSDs with my size needs are $780 for the cheapest quality on OWC. The dual option you mention should not be high end. Just have a bay for the HD, make it accessible, I'll take care of the rest.
Another concern with having a boot SSD and a regular HD, how would I backup a single disk image to a cloned drive? Seems to me that I need to have everything on one volume to create a bootable backup.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Truckee, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by jmiddel
The dual option you mention should not be high end. Just have a bay for the HD, make it accessible, I'll take care of the rest.
Which is exactly the situation now. An Apple SSD for $100 and add whatever third party mass storage you like (up to a TB) into the optical drive slot. And then there are all these crazy folks wanting Apple to change the MBP format!
Frankly it pisses me off folks wanting case change just for the sake of change. The Sandy Bridge MBPs _rock_ as is, and I doubt if the next case version will be better for power users. No way.
But whatever else, the only way any laptop should be built is with SSD for boot and apps. Period (except for hybrids too).
Another concern with having a boot SSD and a regular HD, how would I backup a single disk image to a cloned drive? Seems to me that I need to have everything on one volume to create a bootable backup.
I have no idea what you are talking about here. Dealing with multiple drives is very straightforward.
-Allen
(
Last edited by SierraDragon; Feb 13, 2012 at 01:06 AM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
I think Apple's vision for a thin MacBook Pro is an SSD, no optical and whatever mass storage you need added via Thunderbolt, be it a single GoFlex drive or a Promise Pegasus. Maybe a TB optical if you really need one too.
|
I have plenty of more important things to do, if only I could bring myself to do them....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
The ideal solution would be one where there is a large HDD with a generous chunk of flash to use as cache for important files, all of it managed by the OS. The flash does not have to come as an SSD - in fact, something like the shape of the flash drive in the MBA seems much more logical.
|
The new Mac Pro has up to 30 MB of cache inside the processor itself. That's more than the HD in my first Mac. Somehow I'm still running out of space.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by P
The flash does not have to come as an SSD - in fact, something like the shape of the flash drive in the MBA seems much more logical.
Thats where I see them going, but once you remove the optical drive the HDD is the limiting factor on the thickness of the housing so I think they'll ditch that too in favour of external for those who need it.
|
I have plenty of more important things to do, if only I could bring myself to do them....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: May 2008
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by P
The flash does not have to come as an SSD - in fact, something like the shape of the flash drive in the MBA seems much more logical.
I'm not sure about that. At some point, the question that Apple will face is what exactly is the difference between an MBA and an MBP? One thing that makes a "Pro" machine "Pro" is a greater degree of customizability and upgradeability. Yes, I know that OWC has some upgrade options for the SSD in the MBA, but retaining a standard 2.5" drive slot, Apple would provide the customer with a lot more options.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Nergol
I'm not sure about that. At some point, the question that Apple will face is what exactly is the difference between an MBA and an MBP? One thing that makes a "Pro" machine "Pro" is a greater degree of customizability and upgradeability.
»Pro« has been a marketing moniker for a long time: lots of people were using Pro machines at home while others were making a living with »non-pro« machines. MacBook Pros allow you to upgrade RAM and mass storage. If a future 15" Air were to allow me to upgrade RAM and the SSD »stick«, it would have the same expandability than the current 15" and 17" Pros (save for the possibility to take out the optical drive and put in more mass storage).
Originally Posted by Nergol
Yes, I know that OWC has some upgrade options for the SSD in the MBA, but retaining a standard 2.5" drive slot, Apple would provide the customer with a lot more options.
If it is a question of standards, MacBook Air-style SSD »sticks« have become a standard, too. So Apple would migrate from one standard to another. And I expect that in the future, Thunderbolt will close the gap between Air and Pro line.
|
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yes, Pro will just come to mean 15" or 17" Air. Maybe they'll just drop the Pro and the Air altogether and stick to MacBook.
|
I have plenty of more important things to do, if only I could bring myself to do them....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Waragainstsleep
Yes, Pro will just come to mean 15" or 17" Air. Maybe they'll just drop the Pro and the Air altogether and stick to MacBook.
That's what I was thinking. Apple's vision is quite clear here, they've said it during the introduction of the new MacBook Air: »Soon, all notebooks will look like this!« And then they told what that means: SSD storage, no optical drive, lighter, smaller (slimmer), etc.
|
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Truckee, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Fully agreed, +1.
Personally I am glad I got the 2011 MBP that still has the optical bay for a second mass storage device. The extra space will tide me over until the cost of large SSDs falls some more.
-Allen
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: May 2008
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by OreoCookie
If it is a question of standards, MacBook Air-style SSD »sticks« have become a standard, too.
Feel free to point it out if I'm missing something, but I can't think of a single machine that uses them other than the MBA, nor a single third-party manufacturer other than OWC.
That doesn't make for much of a "standard".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Nergol
Feel free to point it out if I'm missing something, but I can't think of a single machine that uses them other than the MBA, nor a single third-party manufacturer other than OWC.
That doesn't make for much of a "standard".
Many MacBook Air class machines (netbooks) use "stick" SSDs. It was mostly mPCIe for a while but some are mSATA like the MBA now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
Intel's having problems, it seems. I don't think that that affects MBP updates, though - I think they are first in line. iMacs and MBAs may be affected, however.
|
The new Mac Pro has up to 30 MB of cache inside the processor itself. That's more than the HD in my first Mac. Somehow I'm still running out of space.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Nergol
Feel free to point it out if I'm missing something, but I can't think of a single machine that uses them other than the MBA, nor a single third-party manufacturer other than OWC.
That doesn't make for much of a "standard".
Both Samsung and Toshiba makes them, mostly for Apple but I'm sure they'll sell them elsewhere too if asked and that will hinge on whether or not the latest batch of Wintel MacBook Air rip-offs Ultrabooks sell or not.
|
I have plenty of more important things to do, if only I could bring myself to do them....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|