|
|
Dual Displayes? Why?
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: May 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hi all.
I have a question about something that fascinates me: The use of two LCD displayes, side-by-side.
I assume it has to do with forkflow or something or so. Please help me to understand this setup.
I know dual displays looks cool, but what is the practical advantages of say, having two 20inc Studio Displayes next to each other?
Thanx.
Francois.
|
eMac 1.25 GHz/40 GB/768 MB/ComboDrive
-Centurion, South Africa-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Alabama
Status:
Offline
|
|
when u are working with graphics or even code or web design it is very useful to have a second monitor. You can place other windows that you need to use on the second monitor so u can have maximum work space on the project. Its all about space imo.
|
http://www.mafia-designs.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: May 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
OK, spot quiz
2 x 20" displays side-by-side
or
1 x 30" display
Lets's have some fun!
I'm genuinely interested in this!
|
eMac 1.25 GHz/40 GB/768 MB/ComboDrive
-Centurion, South Africa-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status:
Offline
|
|
2 20's. You'd get more viewable area, if i'm not mistaken, and it'd be cheaper.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jun 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
I like dual displays because it allows be to have websites/work on one and AIM, email and calendar on the other.
|
"It's not like Windows users don't have any power. I think a lot of people are happy with Windows, and that's an incredibly depressing thought." -Steve Jobs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Texas
Status:
Offline
|
|
With the new 6800 twin dual-link dvi ports, can't you have 4 20" LCD's?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Alabama
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by djohnson:
With the new 6800 twin dual-link dvi ports, can't you have 4 20" LCD's?
ya, the concept of that is crazy. it would be awesome but i don't see any justifible excuse for this. except it looks kool.
|
http://www.mafia-designs.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
DPP = dollar per pixel
1x20" = 1764000 pixels ($1200) - .00068 DPP
2x20" = 3528000 pixels ($2400) - .00068 DPP
1x23" = 2304000 pixels ($1800) - .00078 DPP
2x23" = 4608000 pixels ($3600) - .00078 DPP
1x30" = 4096000 pixels ($3300) - .000805 DPP (note: this DOESNT include the $$ vid card required to feed a 30")
(prices are approximate refurb when available)
(
Last edited by flukewurm; Oct 14, 2004 at 12:35 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
The 30" gives more viewing area than the 2x20", but I would prefer 2 displays because that's the way I work. I think that the extra width of 2x20" is worth more to me than the extra height of the 30".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
2x20 is the route i plan on taking. its the most $$ conscious. i can live on one 20" for a while. then when the funds come my way adding a second 20" will be a snap.
GIMMIE PIXELS!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Texas
Status:
Offline
|
|
My concept programming desk includes 2 23" monitors hooked up to a G6. Guessing the time frame yet? Yup, many years from now. With the new slim bezels on the new displays, setting 2+ beside each other would be pretty cool. Imagine running 1 30" and 2 20" displays.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Socorro, NM
Status:
Offline
|
|
When I am programing I like to have 2 (or more displays); that way I can look at more files at the same time (or have a reference web page on one display, or my email on one, etc). Of course, you could fit a lot of that on one 30 inch display, but I have never used one of those, nor do I expect to have the money to any time soon. Even if I had a 30" I think that I could find something to put on the extra display.
|
-King Rat
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Seattle
Status:
Offline
|
|
It's not uncommon in the finance industry to have 4 monitors per machine.
I've been working in sales for years, and to tell you the truth, 2 monitors would certainly cut down on all of the alt-tabbing I do.
|
PowerMac G4 Gigabit 1.2GHz, 896MB, 2x 80GB WD SE, Pioneer 107, Radeon 9000 Pro 128MB
Macintosh TV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jun 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by djohnson:
With the new 6800 twin dual-link dvi ports, can't you have 4 20" LCD's?
That's a common misconception. There's still only 2 DVI ports on the card, but each port can carry 2 DVI signals. This is necessary to drive the 30", because there's not enough bandwidth to drive it off a single DVI signal.
|
"It's not like Windows users don't have any power. I think a lot of people are happy with Windows, and that's an incredibly depressing thought." -Steve Jobs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MacNN database error. Please refresh your browser.
Status:
Offline
|
|
For design work, dual displays are also helpful as you can have more pages up at one time. Helpful to see, plus you can keep other apps open without having to minimize or use Expos� all of the time.
|
This is a computer-generated message and needs no signature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: The City Of Diamonds
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by discstickers:
That's a common misconception. There's still only 2 DVI ports on the card, but each port can carry 2 DVI signals. This is necessary to drive the 30", because there's not enough bandwidth to drive it off a single DVI signal.
Well if each port carries 2 signals it can be split into 2, no ?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Pasadena, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I assume it has to do with forkflow or something or so. Please help me to understand this setup.
Ok, I have two CRTs side by side, but the idea and benefits are the same: more screen real estate.
Typically I will have my mail client open in one window, and a browser in the other. Mail comes in, I can see what it is at a glance without having to have annoying alert or distracting bouncing dock icon.
I can code a web page on one monitor and have have a browser running in the other. I make a change, switch to the browser, reload, and switch back all via the keyboard in a second. The experience is considerably less jarring than using windows that overlay each other. Or, instead of a preview of a page, I might have a web page with a code sample or some documentation. Less clutter on the physical desktop, since I don't have to have clunky books lying around.
For design work with things like Photoshop, dual monitors are a god send. You can have your image full screen on one monitor, and then have all the palettes arrainged on the other. You don't have to cover up part of the image to make a change.
Ultimately it is all about screen real estate. I really miss my dual display set up when I go out to job sites and have to do just about anything.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: Cambridge
Status:
Offline
|
|
The main reason I got 2 displays (17" and a 15") is for writing. Most journal articles in the sciences are distributed via PDF nowadays. I didn't want to be printing off 20-30 pages per article and I certainly didn't want to have to cmd-tab between the PDF and my paper. When I'm not writing, it's great to have Mail, iTunes, and an RSS news reader on the 15" and do my web surfing on the 17".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Somewhere, but not here.
Status:
Offline
|
|
i can't imagine working with just one display now...when i am just surfing it's great to have my browser in one screen and mail in the other....when i am working (audio stuff) the more screen space the better....digital performer, reason, moog modular - need to see as much as i can as to what is all going on!
|
Artificial intelligence is no match for natural stupidity...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Alabama
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Mr. Blur:
the more screen space the better....
teh.truth
|
http://www.mafia-designs.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jun 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Powaqqatsi:
Well if each port carries 2 signals it can be split into 2, no ?
You'd probably have to hack into the video driver, but it's probably possible from a technology standpoint.
|
"It's not like Windows users don't have any power. I think a lot of people are happy with Windows, and that's an incredibly depressing thought." -Steve Jobs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Alabama
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Powaqqatsi:
Well if each port carries 2 signals it can be split into 2, no ?
they are dual link dvi inputs. so it may not carry 4 signals.
|
http://www.mafia-designs.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Tronna
Status:
Offline
|
|
More space. Back when I was programming Director movies for CD-ROMs all the developers had dual 15" or a 15" + a 17". There's simply no better way to work IMO.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|