|
|
How to network Macbook and Macbook pro?
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Aug 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
.
(
Last edited by melismak; Aug 30, 2007 at 12:14 AM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Aug 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
.
(
Last edited by melismak; Aug 30, 2007 at 12:14 AM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yes, you could do it wirelessly. But it would take far longer to do. It would take a bit less time through an ethernet cable than wireless, but firewire is THE way here-400Mbps is WAY faster than anything except gigabit ethernet.
Of course if you're only looking for a few files, the speed issue isn't a big deal, but you put it as if you want everything off the MacBook-and Target Disk Mode is made for that. There is a simpler way than Target Disk Mode though-the Migration Assistant in the Utilities folder under Applications. It does use a firewire cable between the two computers, but it holds your hand and helps you along the way.
|
Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
Migration Assistant and a FW cable are certainly the fastest way to get it done.
If you still want to do it over your wireless network do this:
• on the old MB go to System Preferences > Sharing and make sure Personal File Sharing is on; also check the name of the MB which is displayed in the field above
• on the new MBP go to Finder > Go > Connect to Server...
• enter something like afp://nameOfMB.local where nameOfMB is the name you noted in the Sharing panel on the MB
• in the dialog you then get enter the admin user name (this should be the admin on the MB, not on the MBP) and the password
• you can then chose the MB's HD from a list; it will mount on your MBP's desktop and you can copy everything over
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Sep 2007
Status:
Offline
|
|
Ummm, just plug it in and Apple share? Leave it to Apple to keep it simple. lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: France
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by ghporter
but firewire is THE way here-400Mbps is WAY faster than anything except gigabit ethernet
As both macs have gigabit ethernet, why say FireWire is THE way? (except for Migration Assistant)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Polwaristan
Status:
Offline
|
|
Because it's THE way if they don't have Gb ethernet. I don't see the confusion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: France
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Cold Warrior
Because it's THE way if they don't have Gb ethernet. I don't see the confusion.
Question was MacBook <-> MacBook Pro
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Appleman
As both macs have gigabit ethernet, why say FireWire is THE way? (except for Migration Assistant)
Mirgation Assistant was what I was expecting the OP to use-because it automates and simplifies so many issues involved in such a connection between two computers.
If the OP wants an ethernet connection, then he has to manually select IP addresses on both ends, make sure his cable is up to the challenge, and then hope that he'll get more than the data throughput FireWire offers. Remember that there is a significant amount of overhead in ANY ethernet connection, and typical "gigabit" ethernet connections produce substantially less usable data throughput than the theoretical maximum of 1000Mbps, while FireWire (being a less "advanced" connection protocol) has very little overhead and realizable throughputs of very near the stated 480Mbps theoretical max.
|
Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by ghporter
...while FireWire (being a less "advanced" connection protocol) has very little overhead and realizable throughputs of very near the stated 400Mbps theoretical max.
Fixinated.
The argument still holds though. If you're interested in the easiest way to migrate fast, FW+MA is the way to go.
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Simon
Fixinated.
The argument still holds though. If you're interested in the easiest way to migrate fast, FW+MA is the way to go.
Oops, my bad! Stupid fingers early in the morning!
|
Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|