|
|
Doctor Who Season 4
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
(
Last edited by olePigeon; Apr 14, 2008 at 03:23 AM.
Reason: Added spoiler tags.)
|
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Just did a little Googling:
"Following a series of unconfirmed reports across the media this morning, we're delighted to officially confirm that Billie Piper will return as Rose Tyler in Series Four of Doctor Who." - BBC
YES!!!!
(
Last edited by olePigeon; Apr 14, 2008 at 03:23 AM.
Reason: Added spoiler tags.)
|
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Saw episode 2 this weekend. Nothing else to say, I just thought it would be good to have the thread completely made of spoiler boxes!
|
It'll be much easier if you just comply.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: England | San Francisco
Status:
Offline
|
|
I can't stand the new assistant.
|
we don't have time to stop for gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
No spoilers from me — it doesn't premiere here for another five days. Boo.
|
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Aberdeen, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Peter
I can't stand the new assistant.
Me neither. She’s truly, irredeemably awful. She has nothing going for her, and her chemistry with the Doctor is almost non-existent. Whilst I preferred Eccleston to Tennant, I thought Martha and the Doctor had good chemistry, and I quite enjoyed watching them together. Donna, on the other hand, is terrible; she’s loud, obnoxious, and has nothing even remotely interesting to say. The whole time she’s onscreen, I expect her to pop out with one of her inane and irritating catch-phrases.
Overall, it might turn out she’s a deal-breaker. Whilst I’ll probably watch the Rose episodes, if Tate doesn’t improve dramatically in the third episode, I’m going to stop watching it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: England | San Francisco
Status:
Offline
|
|
same. Except I really like Tennant.
|
we don't have time to stop for gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Nobletucky
Status:
Offline
|
|
...we're delighted to officially confirm that Billie Piper will return as Rose Tyler in Series Four of Doctor Who.
Soooo...Does she return as good old Rose? Or is there a twist? The obvious turn would to have her return as an evil Rose, set against the Doctor. What with his constant pining-away for Rose, it would be a bittersweet turn of events to have her return only to be set against him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
Over here in the UK the whole Catherine Tate thing was a real hornets nest. Personally I quite liked her in the Runaway bride and never really got that involved with Martha who was a bit on the wooden side.
Season 4's opener was a step in the right Donna direction. Openers are generally lighter, faster and plot lite as their main reason for being is to get the Doctor together with the new companion or visa versa but I thought there were some excellent touches of both comedy and drama.
Episode two however just blew me away. It was so totally old school who with all the best of the new series sensibilities and production values. The destruction of Pompeii must be a highlight in who effects, no question and I personally thought Donna and the Doctor were excellent. They have the potential to be the best pairing in the shows's history, or at least to equal Tom Baker and Liz Sladen.
It's not just rose that's back later in the series. Both Martha and Sarah Jane are reputed to be on hand for the series' Doctor Lite episode and a shocking death has been mentioned, though this is unlikely to be Sarah Jane since the BBC have just comissioned series two of SJA.
"There's lovely"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: inside 128, north of 90
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hmmm... wait til it premieres on real tv, or find online... I wonder how chock full of commercials and cuts the sci-fi version will be.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by andi*pandi
Hmmm... wait til it premieres on real tv, or find online... I wonder how chock full of commercials and cuts the sci-fi version will be.
We won't find out for a couple of weeks with these episodes — our premiere is the Christmas special from four months ago.
|
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Thorzdad
Soooo...Does she return as good old Rose? Or is there a twist? The obvious turn would to have her return as an evil Rose, set against the Doctor. What with his constant pining-away for Rose, it would be a bittersweet turn of events to have her return only to be set against him.
I'm wondering how she got back, though. I bet it has something to do with when she merged with the TARDIS & whatever technology they had on the parallel world when they shifted with the Cybermen.
|
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Basingstoke, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Catherine Tate is a living joke. And not a very funny one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Louisiana
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'VE NEVER SEEN THIS SHOW, BUT I REEEEEALLY WANTED TO GET IN ON THE SPOILER TAG ACTION!"
So the show is good?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: England | San Francisco
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
we don't have time to stop for gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: T •
Status:
Offline
|
|
Although her character was ok I always thought she looked like a:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: England | San Francisco
Status:
Offline
|
|
nah, shes nice to look at, just this role doesnt suit her.
|
we don't have time to stop for gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Louisiana
Status:
Offline
|
|
I love, love, love that picture. I loled big time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Canaduh
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by analogue SPRINKLES
Although her character was ok I always thought she looked like a:
+++
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|