|
|
Americans easily claim X-Prize!!!
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Way to go Burt!!!!
We crafty Americans leave the rest of the world in the dust with our ingenuity yet again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Far above Cayuga's waters.
Status:
Offline
|
|
That's Really Really cool. (not that Americans did it per s�, just that anyone did)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Night's Plutonian shore...
Status:
Offline
|
|
I don't know if all the "USA USA" rah-rah is called for, but it's definitely cool.
Rock on Spaceship One! (Even though I was rooting for Carmack's team)
|
Nemo me impune lacesset
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm glad to see Burt win this as his engine engineer was killed during the development process.
He crashed test flying his own airplne. The whole project was dedicated to him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by ThinkInsane:
I don't know if all the "USA USA" rah-rah is called for, but it's definitely cool.
Maybe, The USA will REALLY land on the moon someday...
-T
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: England | San Francisco
Status:
Offline
|
|
USA!! USA!! USA!! USA!! USA!! USA!! USA!! USA!! USA!! USA!! USA!! USA!! USA!! USA!! USA!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Vladivostok.ru
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well, I will be one of the passengers in the next 10 years or so, you can bet on it!!
go Burt!!! go Virgin Galactic!! High time we took the first few steps to get the hell outa this mad planet!!
|
_,.
a solitary firefly flies at nite
into the darkness an endless flight
a million flashes of delight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by BoomStick:
We crafty Americans leave the rest of the world in the dust with our ingenuity yet again.
Congratulations Burt Rutan & team...& America...& BoomStick. Great achievement, all of you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Texas
Status:
Offline
|
|
Pretty cool!
Now where are the warp engines?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Alexandria, VA
Status:
Offline
|
|
The point isn't that Spaceship One is American. I'm just happy to see private enterprise making space travel more accessible. This is the way it should be. Spaceplanes are supposed to have "Pan-Am" painted on the side.
Next up: the flying cars I was promised as a kid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New York
Status:
Offline
|
|
I still would have preferred to see the race won by a vehicle that didn't need a piggy back ride into moderate altitudes before it fires its own jets. *sigh* Much cooler would be if the prize was won by a ship that could take off from anywhere without hitching a ride.
|
"I stand accused, just like you, for being born without a silver spoon." Richard Ashcroft
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: zurich, switzerland
Status:
Offline
|
|
PIty about the nationalistic flag waving further up, but all the same way to go Burt Rutan and co. That's really an amazing achievement. I can't wait until Richard Branson starts the first paid flights with Virgin Galactic.
|
weird wabbit
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Alexandria, VA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by AB^2=BCxAC:
I still would have preferred to see the race won by a vehicle that didn't need a piggy back ride into moderate altitudes before it fires its own jets. *sigh* Much cooler would be if the prize was won by a ship that could take off from anywhere without hitching a ride.
I don't follow that argument. Compare SpaceShip One -- which can take off and land from any reasonably large airstrip -- with a rocket which requires a complex purpose-built launch pad. I think the former is much more promising. It's what they should have done with the space shuttle but didn't because of budget cuts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: New York
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by SimeyTheLimey:
I don't follow that argument. Compare SpaceShip One -- which can take off and land from any reasonably large airstrip -- with a rocket which requires a complex purpose-built launch pad. I think the former is much more promising. It's what they should have done with the space shuttle but didn't because of budget cuts.
But that, to me, is the biggest technological hurdle worth a big prize: figuring out how to get the lift and acceleration without all the special launchsite and piggy-back hoohah, all in a re-usable spacecraft. I feel this craft is only half-way there.
|
"I stand accused, just like you, for being born without a silver spoon." Richard Ashcroft
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Congratulations to the SpaceShip One Team. The real beginning of commercial space flight.
|
"Never give in, never give in, never, never, never, never - in nothing, great or small, large or petty - never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense." Winston Churchill
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Alexandria, VA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by AB^2=BCxAC:
But that, to me, is the biggest technological hurdle worth a big prize: figuring out how to get the lift and acceleration without all the special launchsite and piggy-back hoohah, all in a re-usable spacecraft. I feel this craft is only half-way there.
Compare the launch facility Alan Shepard's rocket required for its suborbital flight and compare that to taking off from an ordinary runway. Compared to that, SpaceShip one is positively conventional. The thing can take off and land basically anywhere.
What Rutan is doing is more like the way Chuck Yeager broke the sound barrier. They used a mother ship too. It doesn't detract from Yeager at all, and nor should it detract from Rutan's team.
Edit: what Rutan has done is really directly comparable to the X-15 of the 1960s. That was launched from a mother ship too. The difference is that Rutan's ship is smaller, cheaper, flies (slightly) higher, is probably safer, and can carry 2 passengers. Yea for free enterprise!
(
Last edited by SimeyTheLimey; Oct 4, 2004 at 01:19 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Vladivostok.ru
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by AB^2=BCxAC:
I still would have preferred to see the race won by a vehicle that didn't need a piggy back ride into moderate altitudes before it fires its own jets. *sigh* Much cooler would be if the prize was won by a ship that could take off from anywhere without hitching a ride.
That is if you can raise 10 mil for another award!
|
_,.
a solitary firefly flies at nite
into the darkness an endless flight
a million flashes of delight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Toronto
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by SimeyTheLimey:
Spaceplanes are supposed to have "Pan-Am" painted on the side.
Looks like Branson will get there first:
"Branson, chairman of Virgin Atlantic Airways, announced last Monday that he would invest $25 million in a new space venture, to be called Virgin Galactic. The project will license Scaled Composite's SpaceShipOne technology for commercial suborbital flights starting at about $200,000."
Well done the team. I still want to see these mad Canadian launch their ship from a high altitude balloon though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Alexandria, VA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Mastrap:
Looks like Branson will get there first:
Branson's just copying Stanley Kubrick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
Congratulations to the SpaceShipOne team for setting the bar for commercial spaceflight with two inspiring flights! Americans have every right to be proud of the successful effort made on their behalf in winning this international competition.
Kudos to the remaining teams whose efforts have yet to reach sub-orbital fruition. I hope they all intend to follow through with launch objectives for various individual project entries, as do the teams for both Canadian X-Prize entries:
Canadian Arrow Project
Da Vinci Project
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: 54 56' 38" .058N / 10 0' 33" .071E
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Peter:
USA!! USA!! USA!! USA!! USA!! USA!! USA!! USA!! USA!! USA!! USA!! USA!! USA!! USA!! USA!!
*buuuurp*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Are you always that humor impaired ?
Did you notice that ---> ?
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Colorado Springs
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by DBursey:
Congratulations to the SpaceShipOne team for setting the bar for commercial spaceflight with two inspiring flights! Americans have every right to be proud of the successful effort made on their behalf in winning this international competition.
Canadian Arrow Project
Da Vinci Project
Absolutely, and I think the world would be better if everyone stuck to their relative strengths:
Europe: Science
America: Engineering (we take your science and make useful sh*t with it)
Asia: Reverse-engineering America's sh*t and manufacturing cheap knock-offs.
Seriously, the news makes me happy. Hybrid rocket engines eh? Neat things that, ultra-stable and safe in storage. I was a comp sci. student in college a few years back, had the opportunity to play around a bit with those (worked with the engineering students on several projects), hybrid because the fuel is solid and the oxidizer is liquid or gas. We had a small one strapped to a table, the fuel "rods" were cylinders of plexiglas, the oxidizer was a tank of oxygen (nitrous oxide is safer, but more expensive). Thing was loud as hell, but cool.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Wow, the other projects are decades behind Burt Rutan's vision.
It's incredable that SS1 is a standard cable and shaft controlled aircraft with no computer assist.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: London, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
GO AMERICA!!!!!!!!! YOU SHOWED DEM TERRORISTS!@!!!@U*(!&$*!&@�$&*@�!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: England | San Francisco
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Angus_D:
GO AMERICA!!!!!!!!! YOU SHOWED DEM TERRORISTS!@!!!@U*(!&$*!&@�$&*@�!!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: ma, germany
Status:
Offline
|
|
so, how much is a ride to the moon? any discounts?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by SimeyTheLimey:
The point isn't that Spaceship One is American. I'm just happy to see private enterprise making space travel more accessible. This is the way it should be. Spaceplanes are supposed to have "Pan-Am" painted on the side.
Next up: the flying cars I was promised as a kid.
Indeed!
Though I'm curious how many parts have components made overseas. I'd bet signifigant parts have overseas origin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Congrats to the team. Yet another giant leap for mankind. Not to say that we should dismantle NASA just yet, but this is an important step towards the day when private space travel is possible.
|
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Semi Posting Retirement *ReJoice!*
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by djohnson:
Pretty cool!
Now where are the warp engines?
in the shop for repairs ... the left nacelle was venting ... they gotta patch it up
|
No trees were killed in the sending of this message. However, a large number of electrons were terribly inconvenienced.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Los Angeles of the East
Status:
Offline
|
|
240,000 miles to the moon? Damn I only have enough frequent flyer miles for one way.
|
NOW YOU SEE ME! 2.4 MBP and 2.0 MBP (running ubuntu)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
hayesk
|
|
Originally posted by turtle777:
Are you always that humor impaired ?
Did you notice that ---> ?
-t
Perhaps you should have put the instead?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|