Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Political/War Lounge > Why is oil not a bigger election issue?

Why is oil not a bigger election issue? (Page 3)
Thread Tools
tie
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 25, 2004, 04:13 PM
 
Originally posted by CreepingDeath:
Evidently Bush/Cheney is behind this one too!!!11!!!

Take some basic economics courses people. I'm not genius, but this is all common sense.
Oil is taken out of the ground. Right? Right.
When there is less demand for oil, prices go down with the demand. Perfect opportunity for buying, correct?
When there is a HUGE demand for oil, prices go up with the demand.

Currently, China is using alot of oil. I believe China has also stopped selling coal outside of the country leaving coal prices to go only one way: up. Coal prices are up very high right now.

Oil prices have finally gone up. It was going to happen anyway.
Also, some say prices might have to do with the oil platforms and hurricanes. There is most likely an effect there as well.
Also, it'd be helpful to examine the economy and related news of our largest oil suppliers to see what's happening there, too.
Supply/demand doesn't apply so simply with oil. Prices in the oil market can be largely controlled by the OPEC cartel. There is a growing demand from China. But the US is using much more oil than China. Half the US's fuel consumption goes toward transportation, half that to SUVs, so SUV owners (and our government's encouragement of them) certainly deserve some blame. Many "experts" think that there is a terror premium on oil prices of ~25%. They worry that Saudi Arabia's infrastructure, for example, could be very vulnerable to terrorist attack. This terror premium is largely Bush's fault for filling Iraq with terrorists. Of course there was a serious terrorist threat before our invading Iraq, but we have really energized the terrorist movement.
     
aberdeenwriter
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Aberdeen, WA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 25, 2004, 05:39 PM
 
Originally posted by tie:
Supply/demand doesn't apply so simply with oil. Prices in the oil market can be largely controlled by the OPEC cartel. There is a growing demand from China. But the US is using much more oil than China. Half the US's fuel consumption goes toward transportation, half that to SUVs, so SUV owners (and our government's encouragement of them) certainly deserve some blame. Many "experts" think that there is a terror premium on oil prices of ~25%. They worry that Saudi Arabia's infrastructure, for example, could be very vulnerable to terrorist attack. This terror premium is largely Bush's fault for filling Iraq with terrorists. Of course there was a serious terrorist threat before our invading Iraq, but we have really energized the terrorist movement.
There are many who believe the govt (Bush or whoever is in the Oval Office) can and does control the price of oil.

If that were true, wouldn't President Bush already have turned the prices down so he could more easily win in November?

Here's another website for info on Peak Oil.

http://www.peakoil.net/
Consider these posts as my way of introducing you to yourself.

Proud "SMACKDOWN!!" and "Golden Troll" Award Winner.
     
angaq0k
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Over there...
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 25, 2004, 06:18 PM
 
Originally posted by aberdeenwriter:
There are many who believe the govt (Bush or whoever is in the Oval Office) can and does control the price of oil.

If that were true, wouldn't President Bush already have turned the prices down so he could more easily win in November?

Here's another website for info on Peak Oil.

http://www.peakoil.net/
Oh no!

Having dissatisfaction at a time of crisis makes you not want to change the guy in charge, but keep him for fear someone new might take too long to really get a grasp of what is happening.

There are advantages in keeping Bush in power. It's just that they don't suffice to not change him...

"******* politics is for the ******* moment. ******** equations are for ******** Eternity." ******** Albert Einstein
     
 
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:45 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,