|
|
Pfft ... who says talking points don't work (Page 2)
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Moon
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by voodoo:
He he I remember when you pulled that stupid trick on me. Ah good times.
I think it is obvious to EVERYONE you have been SMACKED DOWN!
Grasping at straws.
What planet do you live in? Bizarro world?
Shoe me where I have been smacked down please.
THX.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Moon
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by constrictor:
You knee-jerking wanna-be liberal.
Are you ever going to answer my question?
Didn't think so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Zimphire:
edited out
The post I quoted was your smackdown boy. Everybody sees it
|
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Moon
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by voodoo:
The post I quoted was your smackdown boy. Everybody sees it
You quoted a lot of posts of mine in this thread voodoo.
Be a good boy and tell me what one in particular, and just how I was smacked down.
THX.
BTW you have a habit of exaggerating. Has anyone ever told you that?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Zimphire:
***edited for the protection of the people who use the ignore list***
It is only in your mind.
|
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Moon
Status:
Offline
|
|
Enough jibber jabber, show me where I was smacked down.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Zimphire:
edited out for your convenience
I already did silly
If you can't follow simple directions why should I bother?
|
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Moon
Status:
Offline
|
|
"The post I quoted was your smackdown" is NOT directions Einstein. As you quoted many posts of mine.
The only post you quoted in THIS thread had nothing I said in it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Zimphire:
****edit****
Good guess, but my name is not Einstein.
Honestly I don't believe you are so stupid you can't find that post. So go - shoo. Find post. Good Zimphire.
Lemme guess.. you're a dog-person rather than a cat-person.
|
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Moon
Status:
Offline
|
|
voodoo the ONLY posts you have made in here are these.
Your 1st post in this thread.
Originally posted by voodoo:
He he I remember when you pulled that stupid trick on me. Ah good times.
I think it is obvious to EVERYONE you have been SMACKED DOWN!
Grasping at straws.
Then I asked you were the smackdown was.
You replied
Originally posted by voodoo:
The post I quoted was your smackdown boy. Everybody sees it
And you never quoted my post.
So voodoo without dodging, or acting the ass like you have been doing. Step up to the plate tough guy and show me where in said post I was smacked down.
In other words, put up or shut up. All you are doing is spreading around your unwanted verbal masturbation you are so famous for.
Lots of hot air, but no substance to back it up.
So surprise me voodoo. Back up your claims at least once in your life.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Capital of the World
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by voodoo:
He he I remember when you pulled that stupid trick on me. Ah good times.
I think it is obvious to EVERYONE you have been SMACKED DOWN!
Grasping at straws.
We are obviously reading two different threads, as Zimph has not been smackdowned in this thread, and what he posted happens to be true.
An intelligent chimpanzee can be trained to type the few characters that make up the word smackdown. This doesn't neccesarily make it true, seeing as you have not refuted anything he has typed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by PacHead:
We are obviously reading two different threads, as Zimph has not been smackdowned in this thread, and what he posted happens to be true.
An intelligent chimpanzee can be trained to type the few characters that make up the word smackdown. This doesn't neccesarily make it true, seeing as you have not refuted anything he has typed.
Apparently an intelligent chimp can be trained to act as the president of the US too
|
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Moon
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Moon
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by PacHead:
We are obviously reading two different threads, as Zimph has not been smackdowned in this thread, and what he posted happens to be true.
He was just being a fanboy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Salamanca, España
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
I could take Sean Connery in a fight... I could definitely take him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Moon
Status:
Offline
|
|
Here I go what? You sent me a link to one of "constrictor's" absurd posts.
What is your point? What he said doesn't even COME CLOSE to describe me.
BTW what does THAT quote have to do with what you claimed you quoted from me that was a smackdown?
Sounds like to me you were just talking out your lower orifice as usual.
But that is typical fanboying.
(
Last edited by Zimphire; Sep 13, 2004 at 10:14 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2000
Location: Retired
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Zimphire:
Here I go what? You sent me a link to one of "constrictor's" absurd posts.
What is your point? What he said doesn't even COME CLOSE to describe me.
OOOO can I try?
|
Power Macintosh Dual G4
SGI Indigo2 6.5.21f
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Aug 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Zimphire:
Here I go what? You sent me a link to one of "constrictor's" absurd posts.
What is your point? What he said doesn't even COME CLOSE to describe me.
BTW what does THAT quote have to do with what you claimed you quoted from me that was a smackdown?
Sounds like to me you were just talking out your lower orifice as usual.
But that is typical fanboying.
How's that knee doing, Zimph? Did it get caught in the projector?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Moon
Status:
Offline
|
|
I see constrictor still hasn't looked up the meaning of "knee jerk"
Making such statements like you did above is a knee-jerk in itself.
I think I hear your mom calling you to get off her computer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Aug 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Zimphire:
I see constrictor still hasn't looked up the meaning of "knee jerk"
Making such statements like you did above is a knee-jerk in itself.
I think I hear your mom calling you to get off her computer.
Fanboy. Please step to the back of the line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Moon
Status:
Offline
|
|
Talking to yourself fanboy?
I see you are just another poster hiding behind a "new" nick.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Aug 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Zimphire:
Talking to yourself fanboy?
I see you are just another poster hiding behind a "new" nick.
Such an inflated ego there. You remind me of one of those Ivy League mealy-mouthed liberals.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Moon
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by constrictor:
Such an inflated ego there. You remind me of one of those Ivy League mealy-mouthed liberals.
You know how big of an idiot you look like when you point the liberal accusing finger at me right?
Go play in the traffic or something.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: retired
Status:
Offline
|
|
What a mess this thread is...
Ok, who's to blame?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Moon
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Dis
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Atomic Rooster:
What a mess this thread is...
Ok, who's to blame?
Who knows? Though it is kind of fun, in a "can't stop watching a train wreck" kind of way to watch this "new" firebrand lay in to little Zimmy.
BG
|
I do not feel obliged to believe that the same God who has endowed us with sense, reason, and intellect has intended us to forgo their use. -Galileo Galilei, physicist and astronomer (1564-1642)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Moon
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by BlackGriffen:
Who knows? Though it is kind of fun, in a "can't stop watching a train wreck" kind of way to watch this "new" firebrand lay in to little Zimmy.
BG
lay into me? You have to be kidding.
If using a word incorrectly over and over again ad-nauseum like a broken record is "laying it into me" the I would HATE to see what you think doing a piss poor troll job was.
But you are right this guy is "new"
Just a insecure cowardly fanboy.
They are dime a dozen.
Too bad he doesn't have the guts to use his regular account.
His yellow star is fitting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Aug 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Zimphire:
lay into me? You have to be kidding.
If using a word incorrectly over and over again ad-nauseum like a broken record is "laying it into me" the I would HATE to see what you think doing a piss poor troll job was.
But you are right this guy is "new"
Just a insecure cowardly fanboy.
They are dime a dozen.
Too bad he doesn't have the guts to use his regular account.
His yellow star is fitting.
I thought liberals claimed the corner on conspiracy theories?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: retired
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Zimphire:
lay into me? You have to be kidding.
If using a word incorrectly over and over again ad-nauseum like a broken record is "laying it into me" the I would HATE to see what you think doing a piss poor troll job was.
But you are right this guy is "new"
Just a insecure cowardly fanboy.
They are dime a dozen.
Too bad he doesn't have the guts to use his regular account.
His yellow star is fitting.
Pretty low even for you Zimp!
You have many stars and have some absurd amount of posts.
I couldn't come close to reading all of them let alone post that many and hold a job at the same time.
But of the many I have read they don't amount to a hill o' beans let alone contain any thought or intelligence.
Insecure, cowardly...come on?!!? That is a very low personal attack against someone who disagrees with you and wishes to debate.
Looks to me your the one rolling on the floor stamping his feet and screaming
for your blankey.
Definitely not a fanboy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Interstellar Overdrive
Status:
Offline
|
|
So who is this guy?
Lerkfish is back?!
Anyone�where has this thread gone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Aug 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
I was just reminiscing about high school math classes, and I came up with an interesting thought.
Let's say someone participates frequently in an activity that could be completed fairly quick under the right circumstances. Just for kicks, let's say this someone participated in said activity 23575 times over the course of about 2 years.
If we very conservatively guess that, on average, the activity takes about 20 seconds from start to finish, we can follow through with unit conversions:
23575 instances X 0.33 minutes = 7780 minutes
7778 minutes X 1hour/60 minutes = 130 hours
130 hours X 1day/24hours = about 5.4 days (wakeful days with no sleep included whatsoever)
Pretty cool, huh? By doing simple math and converting units, we find that a person who very, very frequently completes a quick activity can spend as much as a week out of every two years doing so. For many people, that could be a family vacation, or several other longer-lived activities, like exercise or getting fitted for a hearing aid.
When we relate this fun information to the topic, we find that even Iraqis could participate in such activities, and spend a surprising amount of time doing something that seems so insignificant at the time. That's freedom! Yee-haw!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Interstellar Overdrive
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by constrictor:
I was just reminiscing about high school math classes, and I came up with an interesting thought.
Let's say someone participates frequently in an activity that could be completed fairly quick under the right circumstances. Just for kicks, let's say this someone participated in said activity 23575 times over the course of about 2 years.
If we very conservatively guess that, on average, the activity takes about 20 seconds from start to finish, we can follow through with unit conversions:
23575 instances X 0.33 minutes = 7780 minutes
7778 minutes X 1hour/60 minutes = 130 hours
130 hours X 1day/24hours = about 5.4 days (wakeful days with no sleep included whatsoever)
Pretty cool, huh? By doing simple math and converting units, we find that a person who very, very frequently completes a quick activity can spend as much as a week out of every two years doing so. For many people, that could be a family vacation, or several other longer-lived activities, like exercise or getting fitted for a hearing aid.
When we relate this fun information to the topic, we find that even Iraqis could participate in such activities, and spend a surprising amount of time doing something that seems so insignificant at the time. That's freedom! Yee-haw!
Atomic Rooster is that you?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2000
Location: south
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by constrictor:
I was just reminiscing about high school math classes, and I came up with an interesting thought.
Let's say someone participates frequently in an activity that could be completed fairly quick under the right circumstances. Just for kicks, let's say this someone participated in said activity 23575 times over the course of about 2 years.
If we very conservatively guess that, on average, the activity takes about 20 seconds from start to finish, we can follow through with unit conversions:
23575 instances X 0.33 minutes = 7780 minutes
7778 minutes X 1hour/60 minutes = 130 hours
130 hours X 1day/24hours = about 5.4 days (wakeful days with no sleep included whatsoever)
Pretty cool, huh? By doing simple math and converting units, we find that a person who very, very frequently completes a quick activity can spend as much as a week out of every two years doing so. For many people, that could be a family vacation, or several other longer-lived activities, like exercise or getting fitted for a hearing aid.
When we relate this fun information to the topic, we find that even Iraqis could participate in such activities, and spend a surprising amount of time doing something that seems so insignificant at the time. That's freedom! Yee-haw!
LOL
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: retired
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by constrictor:
I was just reminiscing about high school math classes, and I came up with an interesting thought.
Let's say someone participates frequently in an activity that could be completed fairly quick under the right circumstances. Just for kicks, let's say this someone participated in said activity 23575 times over the course of about 2 years.
If we very conservatively guess that, on average, the activity takes about 20 seconds from start to finish, we can follow through with unit conversions:
23575 instances X 0.33 minutes = 7780 minutes
7778 minutes X 1hour/60 minutes = 130 hours
130 hours X 1day/24hours = about 5.4 days (wakeful days with no sleep included whatsoever)
Pretty cool, huh? By doing simple math and converting units, we find that a person who very, very frequently completes a quick activity can spend as much as a week out of every two years doing so. For many people, that could be a family vacation, or several other longer-lived activities, like exercise or getting fitted for a hearing aid.
When we relate this fun information to the topic, we find that even Iraqis could participate in such activities, and spend a surprising amount of time doing something that seems so insignificant at the time. That's freedom! Yee-haw!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Moon
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by constrictor:
I was just obsessing about Zimphire...
Yee-haw!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Aug 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Zimphire:
How's that knee doing, Picture Page Boy?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: The Moon
Status:
Offline
|
|
>>>> <<<<
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Aberdeen, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by TETENAL:
To me this actually sounds like being in support of the "not ties" theory.
Sure, some "senior agents" talked with Al Qaida, but isn't that the job of agents? I would bet American or Israeli agents talked with Al Qaida as well at some point in time. At least they should if they do their job well.
Speaking of Israeli agents, here's an account of an ex-Mossad agent. (How do we know he's not lying? I don't know how to verify or disprove his story.)
He implies that some of the US foreign 'engagements' have been due to Mossad tricks.
Like Reagan's Libya bombing.
Interesting reading, if nothing else.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/deception.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Up In The Air
Status:
Offline
|
|
If you're going to cite Ostrovsky, you would do well to read his whole book, and not just what that website wants you to read.
Additionally, you would do well to remember that Ostrovsky was only in Mossad for a period less than two years: How much do you think he really knows, and how much was to get a good advance from the book publisher?
|
If this post is in the Lounge forum, it is likely to be my own opinion, and not representative of the position of MacNN.com.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Aberdeen, WA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by vmarks:
If you're going to cite Ostrovsky, you would do well to read his whole book, and not just what that website wants you to read.
Additionally, you would do well to remember that Ostrovsky was only in Mossad for a period less than two years: How much do you think he really knows, and how much was to get a good advance from the book publisher?
I ran across the page looking for something else. Just thought it would provide another perspective on the BIG PICTURE.
I didn't know anything about him til I read the page. But now (with a tip of the cap to you, vmarks) I know a tad more. You seem to know SOMETHING about almost everything, don't you?
Thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|