|
|
1GHZ Vs. 1.33GHz 17" Powerbook
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Huntington Beach, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hi I'm in the market to replace my titanium powerbook and I was wondering if any could give me some input on if there is really any signifigant PERFORMANCE difference with the 1GHz vs. the 1.33GHz. I have seen the 1GHz priced at $2400 lowest and its looks good but if the 1.33 really offers that big of a difference other than 20gb more hd space. SO money really isn't an issue but performance is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
I have heard and read elsewhere that the 133 is about 20% faster. I opted for the 133 becasue I hope to keep it for 3 years....and the cost difference is for me justified.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Pittsburgh
Status:
Offline
|
|
I've had no experience with the Rev. B PowerBooks, so I'm in no position to contrast the two. What I can say is that my Rev. A (1 Ghz) has yet to hiccup with the workload I've thrown at it. It just shrugs and then rips through the work. A typically heavy load would include batch processing a ton of high quality (7-8 MB a piece) files in Photoshop in the background will doing minor text/web editing in Dreamweaver. The performance in Dreamweaver declines slightly, but it's not quite significant. I have batch processed huge files (somewhere between 100-300 MB a piece) in Photoshop during which I just had to sit back and let the machine do it's thing.
Like Podolsky, I also buy machines with the intent of keeping them around for 3 to 5 years. I still have my old Lombard which I used up until summer of last year. I couldn't do the same things (batch processes in Photoshop) as I can with my 17", but because I maintained it it lasted me until I finally caved in and bought a new machine. I guess that's a little background about my computer use to give you an idea of how I use my machines. Hope all that info helps.
|
^Thanks to sealobo
Viva le ScrollWheel!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Upwind from Quebec...
Status:
Offline
|
|
Test 17" rev A 17" rev B
PS 82 68 (lower)
CPU 301 214 (lower)
Quake 95 106 (higher)
Cine 1.8 10.6 (higher)
AE 1597 1196 (lower)
|
people ruin everything....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: California
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by JasonY01:
Hi I'm in the market to replace my titanium powerbook and I was wondering if any could give me some input on if there is really any signifigant PERFORMANCE difference with the 1GHz vs. the 1.33GHz. I have seen the 1GHz priced at $2400 lowest and its looks good but if the 1.33 really offers that big of a difference other than 20gb more hd space. SO money really isn't an issue but performance is.
This has been discussed aplenty before. Look here, for example:
http://forums.macnn.com/showthread.php?threadid=185925
There *IS* a justifiable performance difference between the 1.33 and the 1.0.
-A
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|