|
|
I have no confidence in computers anymore (Page 3)
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by subego
That's like saying I know the engine works, therefore it is impossible for the car to be broken.
To take this analogy further, it should be noted you aren't even looking at the engine yourself, merely trusting someone else who says it works.
WTF is is supposed to mean ?
Your argument was that 1PW doesn't share their code.
That argument is invalid.
To stay with your analogy: it's not the engines's fault that you're not a ****ing engineer.
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
There's some solid turtle logic right there: I don't understand, therefore you are wrong.
If I was going to try and hack 1Pass, I wouldn't try and hack OpenSSL, I'd try and exploit the specific way AgileBits implements it.
OpenSSL is the engine. 1Pass is the car. Just because the engine is secure doesn't mean I can't rip that tranny right out of you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by subego
If I was going to try and hack 1Pass, I wouldn't try and hack OpenSSL, I'd try and exploit the specific way AgileBits implements it.
OpenSSL is the engine. 1Pass is the car. Just because the engine is secure doesn't mean I can't rip that tranny right out of you.
Again, you're not sticking to the original point you started out with - Dropbox.
There is reason to believe that there's any way to compromise 1Password by replacing the the 1Password database on Dropbox. Definitely not in the scenario of replacing the database with an executable malware.
Everything else about 1Password's potential vulnerability might be true, but is not what we've been discussing.
At this point, I'm close to just chalking you off as security paranoid.
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status:
Offline
|
|
I think it's time to re-post the xkcd cartoon again: I think it's far easier to guess a password or to social engineer this person to give you his/her password than it is to crack 1Password.
|
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by turtle777
Again, you're not sticking to the original point you started out with - Dropbox.
There is reason to believe that there's any way to compromise 1Password by replacing the the 1Password database on Dropbox. Definitely not in the scenario of replacing the database with an executable malware.
Everything else about 1Password's potential vulnerability might be true, but is not what we've been discussing.
At this point, I'm close to just chalking you off as security paranoid.
-t
Paranoid? That's how security happens.
However, if I was that worried about potential 1Pass vulnerablilities with Dropbox do you think I would use it and suggest it to other people?
Either way, you are free to think a database which is available on the Internet is just as safe as one that isn't. I'm not going to put in much more effort into disabusing yourself of that notion. I can only explain the obvious up to a point.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by OreoCookie
I think it's time to re-post the xkcd cartoon again: I think it's far easier to guess a password or to social engineer this person to give you his/her password than it is to crack 1Password.
No question. I still maintain regardless of how secure something is, it's less secure if it's in the cloud.
Whether that matters is case dependent. In my personal case with 1Pass and DropBox, it doesn't matter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by subego
No question. I still maintain regardless of how secure something is, it's less secure if it's in the cloud.
Technically, this is true, but if the weakest point is not software but the human element, I don't see anyone going for the software route (at least not by attacking 1Password directly, a keylogger perhaps or other spy software).
I still think that you're worrying about the exact wrong thing. I'm sure there are still ways to gain control certain accounts of yours similar to the amazon/Apple social engineering attack, and that those are the paths hackers take instead of hacking software that is based on a robust encryption scheme. Sort of like insisting that this complicated lock on your front door is still pickable, but ignoring the fact that the bedroom window is open.
If someone really wants to get after you, they'll get you. But if some people pick you by chance, having good defenses (good passwords, etc.) will make you a less inviting target. That's what I go for anyway.
|
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
I have less than zero concern someone is going to hack 1Pass to get to me personally.
My concern is greater than zero people will try to hack 1Pass. Its mere existence makes it a target.
The likelihood 1Pass will get hacked and then I got caught up in it as a user is non-zero, but not high enough to register concern.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Standing on the shoulders of giants
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by subego
I have less than zero concern someone is going to hack 1Pass to get to me personally.
My concern is greater than zero people will try to hack 1Pass. Its mere existence makes it a target.
The likelihood 1Pass will get hacked and then I got caught up in it as a user is non-zero, but not high enough to register concern.
You just don't give a sh1t do you ?
I'm not being (or trying to be) an asshole btw.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by mattyb
I'm not being (or trying to be) an asshole btw.
Please allow me to apologize again for that. I was being the asshole, not you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Standing on the shoulders of giants
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by subego
Give a shit about what?
I have less than zero = not giving a shit.
I was trying to be funny, but failed. Again. Sorry.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
That's because the French have no sense of humour.
(Let's see where that takes us)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status:
Offline
|
|
matty, subego, and I walk into a bar. A fist fight breaks out instantaneously.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Great White North
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by The Final Dakar
matty, subego, and I walk into a bar. A fist fight breaks out instantaneously.
Then you all wake up the next morning in the same bed together unaware of what happened
|
Blandine Bureau 1940 - 2011
Missed 2012 by 3 days, RIP Grandma :-(
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Athens
Then you all wake up the next morning in the same bed together unaware of what happened
Please, keep you MacNN fan fiction erotica to yourself and your hand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Phileas
That's because the French have no sense of humour.
(Let's see where that takes us)
Says the German.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Just smashed my Titanium PowerBook.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Because that sounds like more fun than dealing with a G4?
I gave my G4 MBP away to someone who needed to run some OS9 stuff.
Even though he needed it, I still felt like I was causing injury by giving it to him.
By the same token, never donate an old computer to a school. I'd rather have a student spend time reading a book rather than waste that time on garbage hardware.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
The titanium Powerbooks are totally awesome machines, and as long as they're still functional, they age wonderfully, looking like real veterans.
It's a bit like smashing a 70s-vintage Land Rover.
There are modern machines that do everything it could do better, but dammit, that's a piece of history. Give it to somebody who can see the value, at least.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
It's like smashing a 70's Land Rover with an engine from the 40's.
Sure it looks nice, but is way more trouble than it's worth in terms of getting from A to B.
A netbook would smoke the TiBook, just like a Corolla would smoke the Landy with the bum engine.
P.S. I don't think he really smashed it.
P.P.S. don't the TiBooks warp and chip? The 2K3 vintage MBP I gave away looked like new.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
One actual year is 7 dog years and about 15 processor years.
That TiBook is is rapidly approaching 200. Time to take her behind the barn.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by subego
One actual year is 7 dog years and about 15 processor years.
That TiBook is is rapidly approaching 200. Time to take her behind the barn.
That applies to my old Macintosh SE, as well. I should probably throw it away.
tiBooks tend to look like this eventually:
Personally, I think that looks awesome.
The number of tiBooks with intact screen hinges is rapidly shrinking. These machines are at least ten years old now. If you can't appreciate a digital classic, don't just throw it away, or even worse, destroy it for the hell of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot
That applies to my old Macintosh SE, as well. I should probably throw it away.
Christ... YES!
Harriet, get the rifle.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
If you place it just right, you could probably get a single bullet through the entire packaging, original floppy set, documentation, the machine, AND through the ImageWriter II with documentation and original packaging that my client gave me together with the computer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
ImageWriter?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Somewhere along the line I decided old computer hardware, and more importantly, old computer boxes aren't worth the space. I have yet to regret throwing out every computer box. Right now I'm debating on whether to pitch the boxes my recording gear is in. Manley even bitches you out for considering it on the box.
I'm gonna live life on the edge. If it's solid-state, the box is going. The extra space is worth far more than needing to pay someone to pack it properly if something needs servicing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by subego
ImageWriter?
ImageWriter II.
Sadly, no sheet feeder included (I had one on mine, back in the day).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
"Perf"? You mean the folded, perforated paper, preferably green/white lines?
Of course.
You can feed it individual pages of A4, as well, but page by page.
The IW II with a sheet feeder was awesome, back in '89.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Perf?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Standing on the shoulders of giants
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot
It's a bit like smashing a 70s-vintage Land Rover.
Nice analogy for us Apple history noobs.
And respect.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yes, I did kill the PowerBook.
I felt like it was holding me back. It actually died back in '09, or '10 (diagnosed as fried graphics chip). It would function intermittently and then the graphic would scramble. Recently it has been working well enough that I installed 10.5 on it and kept it prepped as a backup machine just in case my primary system suddenly has problems (gotta be able to get my bank statements after all.)
But in order to be able to use it effectively with my current data I was limited to using apps that were compatible with PPC/10.5. This was getting rather frustrating. So, now it is gone and I have no backup if my Mini freaks out...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Intermittent graphics points to a loose connector or an overheating problem.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Feb 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by subego
Intermittent graphics points to a loose connector or an overheating problem.
Overheating is a possibility, although I always kept it on a fan cooling pad. Just the act of installing 10.5 was pretty taxing and it didn't conk out during that (by that time I was not longer using the cooling pad.)
I would say all of the connections are pretty 'loose' at this point due to the smashing.
I do wish that I had not done that. If for no other reason than if anything goes wrong with my desktop set-up I will be totally offline.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
I've seen a TiBook with that issue before. It took 8 months to fail when I had it in for repair but it got a new mobo eventually. I imagine it would have gotten worse as time went on.
|
I have plenty of more important things to do, if only I could bring myself to do them....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by subego
It's like smashing a 70's Land Rover with an engine from the 40's.
Sure it looks nice, but is way more trouble than it's worth in terms of getting from A to B.
That most certainly applies to my '68 B-3. Built in the late 60s around technology from 1935.
At 190 kg and needing yearly maintenance, it is way more trouble than it's worth, *especially* in terms of getting from A to B.
Except, for some reason, *nobody* who has experienced it, has the slightest doubt that it's worth the trouble, provided they can afford to have me bring it along.
Of course, that doesn't really tie back to the tiBook, because the Hammond still smashes to smithereens any successor, while the tiBook lives from the historic context.
Thus may end this digression into legendary technology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Standing on the shoulders of giants
Status:
Offline
|
|
Thats when the lights were on the centre grill right? Not exactly economical either is it? What are you getting per 100km?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Actually, I'm talking about a Hammond organ. I'm not much of a car guy; I merely mentioned it to illustrate a point.
Sorry to disappoint.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Standing on the shoulders of giants
Status:
Offline
|
|
LOL. 190kg is a bit light for a Land Rover ;-)
Edit : I was hoping to learn something.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm still wondering why the Landy is such an apropos analogy.
I'm not a car guy either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
Because Land Rovers rock. My last Landie was a 1964 Series II SWB ragtop. I still regret not taking it with me when we moved.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Just from that time frame?
Don't get me wrong, I've wanted a Range Rover since before it was a "thing".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Range Rovers have nothing to do with Land Rovers.
One is a ****ing awesome tank, and the other is everything that defined an SUV decades befor the category existed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Maryland
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Toronto, Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Thank you!
I wanted the RR more than the LR, but I wanted the kind you could hose out.
What made them cool to me was seeing them in documentaries about the wilds of Africa as a kid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|