Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Software - Troubleshooting and Discussion > macOS > Accessorizing an XServe

Accessorizing an XServe
Thread Tools
nonhuman
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 20, 2002, 07:14 PM
 
Two questions:
1) What would be the best way to get an XServe to serve and AirPort network (do they have a AirPort card slot)?

2) Where could one get a small rack?

<small>[ 06-20-2002, 07:20 PM: Message edited by: nonhuman ]</small>
     
misc
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 20, 2002, 11:09 PM
 
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">Originally posted by nonhuman:
<strong>Two questions:
1) What would be the best way to get an XServe to serve and AirPort network (do they have a AirPort card slot)?</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">Apple has no mention of an Airport slot, but if you look closely at the screenshots of the status software the IP's for the Xserves are 10. numbers, which means that they were running through an Airport card.


"And after we are through, ten years in making it to be the most of glorious debuts."
     
Rickster
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Vancouver, WA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 21, 2002, 02:27 AM
 
Um, no.

The 10.x.x.x IP address range is reserved for private network use. Any IP network can use 10.x.x.x addresses, whether it's over Ethernet or AirPort or any other physical layer.
Rick Roe
icons.cx | weblog
     
misc
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 21, 2002, 04:49 PM
 
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">Originally posted by Rickster:
<strong>Um, no.

The 10.x.x.x IP address range is reserved for private network use. Any IP network can use 10.x.x.x addresses, whether it's over Ethernet or AirPort or any other physical layer.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">Yeah, thats true. But why would Apple use a 10. number if it may interfere with their Airport networks? Doesn't make sense.

"And after we are through, ten years in making it to be the most of glorious debuts."
     
Scotttheking
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: College Park, MD
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 21, 2002, 10:31 PM
 
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">Originally posted by misc:
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">Originally posted by Rickster:
<strong>Um, no.

The 10.x.x.x IP address range is reserved for private network use. Any IP network can use 10.x.x.x addresses, whether it's over Ethernet or AirPort or any other physical layer.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">Yeah, thats true. But why would Apple use a 10. number if it may interfere with their Airport networks? Doesn't make sense.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">Because a lot use it, and airport can bridge just fine.
Anyone getting an XServe is going to be able to setup a few base stations as bridges.
My website
Help me pay for college. Click for more info.
     
Maneki Neko
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Alaska
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 22, 2002, 04:39 PM
 
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">Originally posted by misc:
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">Originally posted by Rickster:
<strong>Um, no.

The 10.x.x.x IP address range is reserved for private network use. Any IP network can use 10.x.x.x addresses, whether it's over Ethernet or AirPort or any other physical layer.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">Yeah, thats true. But why would Apple use a 10. number if it may interfere with their Airport networks? Doesn't make sense.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">The company I work for uses the 10.X ip addressing scheme internally, many others probably do as well.
     
jaydog
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jan 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 22, 2002, 07:38 PM
 
Why would you use slow airport for it? why not use the 100 base t or the 1000baset ports its much faster.
A Apple a day keeps the pcs at bay
     
nonhuman  (op)
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 22, 2002, 09:30 PM
 
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">Originally posted by jaydog:
<strong>Why would you use slow airport for it? why not use the 100 base t or the 1000baset ports its much faster. </strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">One of the functions of it will be as a gateway to provide internet access. Mostly 100 baseT will be used to get the internet to people, but it would be nice if I had AirPort too, so I (and theoretically others) could move around with my PowerBook and still have internet without having to deal with cords.
     
Camelot
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 1999
Location: San Jose, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 23, 2002, 04:11 AM
 
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">Originally posted by nonhuman:
<strong>One of the functions of it will be as a gateway to provide internet access. Mostly 100 baseT will be used to get the internet to people, but it would be nice if I had AirPort too, so I (and theoretically others) could move around with my PowerBook and still have internet without having to deal with cords.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">Solution: Get an external base station and link it to the XServe via ethernet.

You'll be MUCH better of under this model for several reasons:

1) the XServe is likely to be racked in a metal cabinet or rack - This rack will serve very nicely as an electromagnetic shield, thereby reducing the signal strength from any antenna inside the cabinet.

2) In many locations, the server room is not the most efficient place to put a base station given the location of the users who need wireless access. Using ethernet to link the base station(s) lets you optimally position the base stations independent of where your server is located.
Gods don't kill people - people with Gods kill people.
     
jaydog
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jan 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 23, 2002, 12:52 PM
 
Camelot at least there are some other people on the forum that can achly think strait.. =) and yes Camelot is 100% correct
A Apple a day keeps the pcs at bay
     
jwblase
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: The workshop of the TARDIS...
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 25, 2002, 04:58 PM
 
I think Camelot has the right idea. If I had a room of XServes serving my school, I would not want the wireless base stations to be contained in that room (In the subbasement, with lots of crap all around it.) Hardwire base stations in strategic places throughout the building so that anyone with an iBook/Powerbook could just set up in whatever room is available, not just the rooms with a good reception line to the server room.

JB
---------------------------
"Time will tell. It always does."
-The Doctor
     
kamprath
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: San Francisco, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jun 25, 2002, 08:31 PM
 
</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">Originally posted by misc:
<strong> </font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">quote:</font><hr /><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">Originally posted by Rickster:
<strong>Um, no.

The 10.x.x.x IP address range is reserved for private network use. Any IP network can use 10.x.x.x addresses, whether it's over Ethernet or AirPort or any other physical layer.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">Yeah, thats true. But why would Apple use a 10. number if it may interfere with their Airport networks? Doesn't make sense.</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="1" face="Geneva, Verdana, Arial, sans-serif">Recall that the Xserver can come with two ethernet cards. This is not to make it twice as fast on hte net, but so it can act as a bridge machine from one network to another. Many, many companies have a completely isolated internal IP network, and use a single machine (or maybe more, depending on size) to act as a gateway (and firewall) to the open internet for the inernal network. This means that all incoming and outgoing connections to every maching in the network must go through the gateway/firewall. Internal IP networks typically use the 10.x.x.x adress space. HAving a single gateways makes it much easier to set up a secure company network that still allows inernet access,

Now, if you really think hard, you'll realize that the airport base stations is a gateway/firewall between the "interrnal" network of the macs using airport cards through base stations and the "open network" of the ethernet/modem connection
--
Michael F. Kamprath
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:21 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,