Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Tech News > Lyft caves to NYC regulators, strict TLC-regulated licensure required

Lyft caves to NYC regulators, strict TLC-regulated licensure required
Thread Tools
NewsPoster
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 25, 2014, 01:26 PM
 
Lyft has conceded many of its talking points to the New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission (TLC), but in doing so has forged an agreement to commence operation. Pickups will commence today at 7PM in all five boroughs, but all drivers need to be licensed by the TLC prior to accepting customers. As part of the deal, Lyft will also need to shut down in Buffalo and Rochester to enhance insurance that it offers to riders and drivers.

It is unclear as to which series of licensing requirement that the TLC will require for Lyft drivers. Four classes of licensing exist, with escalating requirements for each. Electronista contacted the TLC, and was given conflicting information, with one official saying that "section one" of the requirements were all that was needed, with a second, more senior official saying that they would deny all candidates that did not provide documentation for a "section three" for-hire vehicle licensure.

Lyft is a San Francisco-based company whose mobile-phone application facilitates peer-to-peer ride-sharing by enabling passengers who need a ride to request one from drivers who have a car. Unlike traditional taxis, Lyft drivers do not charge fares, but instead receive "donations" from their passengers, facilitated through the app. Lyft currently operates in 60 US cities, with plans to expand both domestically and internationally.

The service announced plans to launch on July 11, and was met with resistance from the city of New York. A city official reportedly said that Lyft "want to come in and operate outside the law. There are no shades of gray on this. They intend to operate outside the law."

New York attorney general Eric T. Schneiderman said of the deal that "we are firmly committed to the notion that regulators can work constructively with companies so that new ideas can come to the market -- and that smart regulation should create an environment where innovators can compete. Lyft's launch in New York City -- in full compliance with laws and regulations -- is proof positive of this principle."

Previously, the city warned that "unsuspecting drivers who sign-up with Lyft are at risk of losing their vehicles to TLC enforcement action, as well as being subject to fines of up to $2,000 upon conviction for unlicensed activity."

( Last edited by NewsPoster; Aug 1, 2014 at 04:46 AM. )
     
ElectroTech
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Nov 2008
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 25, 2014, 03:00 PM
 
Its too bad that the drivers in NYC don't all sign up for Lyft and insist that every single car in the city is impounded OR that the taxi drivers and limousine drivers sign up for Lyft too and compete with the locals. The effect would be that there would be plenty of rides for all, lower costs and NO MORE TAXIS OR TLC in New York.
     
FireWire
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Montréal, Québec (Canada)
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 25, 2014, 03:49 PM
 
what? they can seize your car for giving a ride to someone? what free country is this?
     
mr100percent
Forum Regular
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Brightwaters, NY
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 25, 2014, 06:32 PM
 
Good. I'm happy to see that Lyft is following the rules. We have these regulations for a reason, to protect passengers (like background checks on drivers and proof of insurance). Just because you're a new online company doesn't mean you should be exempt from insurance and safety laws.
     
Charles Martin
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Maitland, FL
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 26, 2014, 12:34 AM
 
FireWire: your willfull omission of the phrase "for money" betrays that you know perfectly well these guys were gaming the system. I'm not completely on the side of the TLC but Mr100percent makes a compelling argument -- the rules are there for a reason. Just because I invent a cool way to print money that looks totally real doesn't mean I'm allowed to do so.
Charles Martin
MacNN Editor
     
apple4ever
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Lancaster, PA 17601
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Jul 28, 2014, 10:02 PM
 
And that reason, mr100percent, is to protect companies interest. Its not for your safety, but their profit. Government and business working hand in hand to screw you out of your money.

Lyft's people have a VESTED interest in being safe, and none of the regulations add any additional safety- just more cost for you for a perceived benefit.
Pennsylvania Patriot
Mac Lover
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:06 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,