|
|
Mac mini update to arrive 9/5
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
According to this AI rumor an update of the Mac mini is scheduled for Sep 5.
I'm expecting the single core version to disappear. I don't think any changes will be made to the case. But what do you guys expect? Yonah, Merom, or Allendale? New case or new form factor?
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
I very much doubt the mini will be upgraded, unless the MacBook lines are too updated. There is no way the Mini will get a Merom if the MBPs and MBs still carry Yonah.
OTOH, being the lowest end Mac, I wouldn't be surprised if the Mini got stuck with another rev as a Yonah machine, whilst the others are updated to Merom.
I also doubt a new case or form factor for the mini. I think the design is perfect, and personally I don't think the actual look can be improved on. One things for sure, it always has to be the same size (apart from maybe height), as the optical drive is basically what determined the Mini's size.
One things for sure, Apple should certainly get new machines out of the door ASAP, to beat the competition to mainstream Core2Duo machines. The iPods are also getting VERY long in the tooth IMO
|
iMac Core Duo 1.83 Ghz | 1.25GB RAM | 160HD, MacBook Core Duo 1.83 Ghz | 13.3" | 60HD | 1.0GB RAM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cambridge, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Oooh, that's my Dads birthday. Hopefully the Mini may get some upgrade to the graphics too. I REALLY need to replace this PowerMac.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Aug 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Does this mean for $600 you will get an even better machine, or are they just making better, more expensive models? I just bought an intel solo, I would return it and get the $600 back while I can if they were going to drop soon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
Allendale isn't ready, Merom is too pricey; I say 1.66/1.83Ghz Yonah.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
Here's the leaked Merom pricing I've seen:
1.66 $209
1.83 $240
2.0 $294
2.16 $423
and so on
Yonah is currently:
1.66 $241
1.83 $241
2.0 $294
2.16 $423
With Intel advertising a ~20% performance bump at the same clockrate with Merom, I don't think it's unreasonable to conclude that Yonah will drop in price.
I predict a $499 Core Duo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
We have all seen those prices before. Problem is, Intel has not said what Yonah prices will be once Merom is released. And there are rumors suggesting Yonah will be more expensive than Merom once Merom hits the market.
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Here
Status:
Offline
|
|
I think that a speed bumped Mini is not out of the question. I mean Yonah-Core, but faster. Other lines may see simultatneous and similar bumps.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yeah, I agree. I'm not sure about Yonah vs. Merom, but actually I don't think it really makes a difference either. Apple should just take the cheaper one. I'd like to see a $499 1.66 GHz Duo and a $599 1.83 GHz Duo. Then fill up that huge gap to the MP with a nice headless expandable Mac.
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Honestly, what I most hope for in the mini is a standard 3.5" HDD. This would free the mini from current 2.5" drive capacity limitations and the extra cost to upgrade.
I also hope and expect that the Core Solo will go away and all mini configs become Core Duo. As for Core 2 Duo, that would be a really nice bonus, but as Simon said, I don't think this all that important (I would favor lower price over a newer chip), and I would also very much like to see the low-end mini priced at $500 again or less.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'd like to see an eSATA interface in the Mini.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
I think if they are updated soon the low end model will have a core duo processor and the higher end model will have the same but clocked to similar a speed of the current iMacs.
I'd love to see it fitted with a 7200 rpm hard drive too.
Im buy one of these strictly for the silent operation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Ontario, Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm buying one because I'm too cheap to spend the big $$$ for an iMac
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Home in front of my computer
Status:
Offline
|
|
Wow. That would be just in time for me to buy one. As long as it's worthy enough. I was considering the iMac, but if they made the low-end Core Duo I'd be happier. But I'm still worried about the graphics department. How bad is the integrated graphics? I don't really play games, but would like it to not be crappy at least.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
Im not sure but alot of people stay well away from the mac mini's for that reason alone, as for using the desktop, I'd say it would only make a big difference if you were using high resolutions (like on a 23" screen).
I shift clicked on the amber button on a window to see the genie effect in slow motion on a mac mini the other day and it was perfect (dunno if that helps)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
TS: No more Core Solo for the Mac mini
Apple's Intel-based Mac mini is scheduled for a speed bump revision in the near future, Think Secret has learned. The update will eliminate the only Core Solo-based product from Apple's line-up, moving the 1.66GHz Core Duo model to the low-end and positioning a new 1.83GHz Core Duo Mac mini at the top.
Other specifications of the updated Mac mini are expected to stay mostly the same as the current configuration, sources say. A specific release date is not known, but the new systems are said to be ready for production, suggesting a release within weeks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
I saw that article too.
No more Core Solo as expected.
Of course they don't discuss more interesting issues like price points, GPU, possible case change, etc. It's been a while since rumor sites really had anything interesting to say. For all I know, they could be just posting educated guesses.
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
I wonder if it will get GMA X3000. IIRC, that was supposed to launch in Sept.
It's still crap, but it's less crappy than GMA 950.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
1.83Ghz? thats a pretty small speed bump, oh well its better than nothing i suppose
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by digiology2
1.83Ghz? thats a pretty small speed bump, oh well its better than nothing i suppose
OTOH... It's a humungous speed bump at the low end: Core Solo --> Core Duo.
Interestingly, Intel's emulated next gen graphics support is best on a dual-core CPU. For example, IIRC they don't really support Vista's Aero with Core Solo GMA 950, but do with Core Duo.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
oh yeah I know, the low end is a huge speed bump, but I was looking out for the high end model cos I'll need a superdrive
Lets all pray tonight for a boost to the graphics!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Home in front of my computer
Status:
Offline
|
|
Ooh, I hope so! I've refrained from buying a mini because of that low end.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Eug
I wonder if it will get GMA X3000. IIRC, that was supposed to launch in Sept.
I'm wondering about that as well. Altough I wouldn't be too surprised to see Apple use it the MB first and bring it to the mini later on.
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cambridge, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
I don't understand why they can't/won't just put a Radeon or something back in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
yeah its kinda mean I know, I'd say its mostly just to distinguish the low end minis from the iMacs, plus there may be a lack of space plus heat and cost issues.
I know that the apparently quiet opeation is why Im opting for a mac mini and a graphics card could ruin that!
Shame about the 5400 rpm hard drive too!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cambridge, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well the old PPC Minis used to have a Radeon 9200/9250 in them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
ah, well maybe they're just assholes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: West Michigan
Status:
Offline
|
|
I have to say that I too am only waiting on an update of the video chipset before purchasing the dual-core model for my daughter. I don't need top-of-the-line performance, but I do require adequate performance. Currently the chipset doesn't even keep up with QE all that well. For example on the dual core mini, minimizing windows to the dock can get much choppier than on a much "slower" PPC unit with a "real" video chipset. The chipset in the mini and MacBook is just totally unacceptable.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Here
Status:
Offline
|
|
Intel integrated graphics is alot cheaper than 9200/9250s. On PPC, Intel integrated was not an option, so they put a decent graphics chipset on the board with an anemic amount of VRAM on it. Also, the Radeons were not completely Core Video compatible. GMA950s are. I think that these are part of the reason why Apple put integrated on these.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by panjandrum
I have to say that I too am only waiting on an update of the video chipset before purchasing the dual-core model for my daughter. I don't need top-of-the-line performance, but I do require adequate performance. Currently the chipset doesn't even keep up with QE all that well. For example on the dual core mini, minimizing windows to the dock can get much choppier than on a much "slower" PPC unit with a "real" video chipset. The chipset in the mini and MacBook is just totally unacceptable.
That may be a GPU memory issue more than a speed issue. The Mac mini (and MacBook) are limited to 64 MB. That's pretty stupid actually, considering the chipset can handle up to something like 224 MB RAM. I think a Mac mini with a user selectable 64 MB or 128 MB setting would be ideal.
P.S. Some guy who ordered a 1.5 Core Solo Mac mini got a 1.66 Core Duo with SuperDrive and 100 GB drive. Macbidouille is reporting this as a silent Mac mini update, but I'm guessing it was just a mistake on Apple's part.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cambridge, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Vancouver
Status:
Offline
|
|
Ironic, isn't it when you consider replacing your aging Powermac with a new Mini...
Boy, times have changed!
Originally Posted by seanc
Oooh, that's my Dads birthday. Hopefully the Mini may get some upgrade to the graphics too. I REALLY need to replace this PowerMac.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cambridge, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well I had an iBook G4 before which I sold for the cash to put towards a new Mac. I was using a Windows machine but got sick of it and shoved an old HDD in this thing and installed Tiger. I'm waiting for updates to the lines, I don't want to buy something only to have something new come out a few weeks later.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Far above Cayuga's waters.
Status:
Offline
|
|
no way it'll be september 5th. students are too freshly back to school. if anytime it'll be in october/november when the traditional iBook bump has been.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Cambridge, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Better not be, I need a new Mac for college! Stupid rumours
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
They should make the Mini look match the Airport base stations
|
Certified AppleCare Technician
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
Not a good idea. You couldn't put anything on top of mini anymore.
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
Techincally you're not supposed to anyways. The top isn't reinforced and bends in like crazy, risking damage to the superdrive. Unless they've fixed that
|
Certified AppleCare Technician
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
The MacBU has hundreds of Mac minis on their sides, lined up like books on a shelf (but I believe with a little bit of space between them). No strain on the Mac mini's case, but it's definitely a big space saver.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by stefanicotine
Techincally you're not supposed to anyways. The top isn't reinforced and bends in like crazy, risking damage to the superdrive. Unless they've fixed that
I think they have. We have a stack of ten minis for testing and I just pulled out the bottom one to check. No problems at all. SD works like a charm too. The top surface (white) might not be reinforced. But the Al frame is rock solid.
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Canada
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Simon
I think they have. We have a stack of ten minis for testing and I just pulled out the bottom one to check. No problems at all. SD works like a charm too. The top surface (white) might not be reinforced. But the Al frame is rock solid.
Agreed. The frame is sturdy as a rock. When I had my mini I put my LCD on it. The feet of the screen rested perfectly on the corners of the frame so I never worried. However, push down on the white plastic and it bends like crazy.
|
Certified AppleCare Technician
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yeah, I've noticed that too. I wouldn't put too much pressure on the white part. But the frame is fine.
Re: the new minis, I'm wondering what Apple's paying for Yonah so they decided to use it instead of Merom. Intel must have given them a nice price cut.
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|