|
|
iMac 2.1 vs Powerbook 1.67
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Just wondering if there are any comparisons or benchmarks against the two. I know they are quite different computers but I use photoshop and final cut a lot. And I just sold my Powerbook for an iMac and am curious to see roughly what I can expect.
Thanks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
Unfortunately Barefeats hasn't reviewed them yet, but they should have a review out soon.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Feb 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by reemas
Just wondering if there are any comparisons or benchmarks against the two. I know they are quite different computers but I use photoshop and final cut a lot. And I just sold my Powerbook for an iMac and am curious to see roughly what I can expect.
Thanks.
Since the new iMac G5 2.1 GHz has faster CPU, RAM, HD, FBS.....I'm almost certain the iMac's benchmarks will be quite higher than the PB G4 1.67ghz.
If you don't need a portable, go for the iMac.
|
My first Mac:
15.2-inch Titanium G4 @ 1Ghz
1GB Ram
40 GB
64MB Video Ram
iPod Nano 4GB Black
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yeah I did go for the iMac. I'm just looking forward to it and thought it would be interesting to see some benchmarks or head to head comparisons. I know it will be much faster. The current PB line is no professional computer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|