 |
 |
Sherlock 3...when will Apple add more channels?
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Retired.
Status:
Offline
|
|
I am shocked to see that Apple hasn't added a thing to Sherlock 3 since it's release...what's up? What's next?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: North Hollywood, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I think they want to let Watson to have some advantages over it.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Partying down with the Ewoks, after I nuked the Death Star!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Probibly cuz we all got better ways of finding the information anyway.
|
"Hello, what have we here?
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Retired.
Status:
Offline
|
|
True; however, that is when it calls for Apple to truly be innovative and think of something that can make Sherlock 3 better then our "other better ways of finding the information"...
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: May 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Apple doesn't necessarily have to develop new channels for Sherlock to be inovative. There are channels being developed by third parties to do many things.
http://www.sherlockers.com/
Scott
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: The workshop of the TARDIS...
Status:
Offline
|
|
Many of the third party Sherlock 3 plug-ins are useful... I'm almost never using Watson anymore thanks to these plugins. They're maintained by the developers, and Apple doesn't have to update them all the time. Each time they're invoked, they update themselves (if I am looking at my plug-ins right)
JB
|
|
---------------------------
"Time will tell. It always does."
-The Doctor
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Trapped in the depths of my mind
Status:
Offline
|
|
ReefHobbyist: Thanks for the link. I've been meaning to add more channels to Sherlock. 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Does anybody know where the movies channel went? I went to use it one day and it was gone. ???
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
When will Apple next add some more channels? Probably at Macworld NY (if there is such a thing this year) or for OS X 10.3 (or whatever they call it) so they can get some more publicity for it and count it as a feature. Or maybe when they update it to use Webcore for HTML rendering. Apple historically didn't add many channels to Sherlock 2, I don't think.
Does Apple want Watson to have some advantages? I doubt it. They are direct competitors. Simple as that.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Milan, Europe
Status:
Offline
|
|
The real problem is if Sherlock will remain a standalone app, or if it will become a plugin/part available in any app (� la Services, but better)...
|
The freedom of all is essential to my freedom. - Mikhail Bakunin
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Status:
Offline
|
|
another question is: will apple make sherlock run any faster. Maybe its my old computer...sawtooth 400mhz, but nothing else runs that slow.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Retired.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by mogura:
another question is: will apple make sherlock run any faster. Maybe its my old computer...sawtooth 400mhz, but nothing else runs that slow.
Not here on my TiBook 667 DVI and Cable Modem....it's actually ALOT faster since it's inception.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top