|
|
How often to you manually index spotlight?
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
How often to you manually index spotlight? I mean force it to re-index. This seems to come up in the forums a lot — this need for do that in system prefs.
Should I should do monthly or every few months? And why does anyone ever need to do this? Shouldn't Apple have this perfected by now?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Land of Enchantment
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Never.
I also don't defragment, nor do I repair permissions.
I don't have time to fix stuff that's already working.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
thanks J and S.
Well it comes up on some of my threads that I Need to put a hard drive into the privacy tab and delete it to push spotlight to index. You have never seen this on a thread?
This force indexing of Spotlight?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Of course I've seen this as a troubleshooting tip. In fact, I've DONE this as a troubleshooting step.
But there are idiots out there who recommend doing so regularly, just like they recommend repairing permissions regularly, and before and after installing anything, and before and after repairing permissions.
They're not maintenance tasks. They're recovery or repair tools, and using them at any other time is almost certainly a complete waste of time and effort.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
thanks S, got it. cool.
Final question:
why does anyone ever need to do this? Shouldn't Apple have this perfected by now?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Things break.
There is no such thing as perfect code under all imaginable (and, more importantly, UNimaginable) circumstances.
I don't remember exactly, but I think I've only ever had to reset the Spotlight index once on a client's machine, and once on mine. But that was years ago.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
thanks S. I see it a lot on threads as something I should do. oh well...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
I saw no need to index Spotlight since it is crippled anyway. I use EasyFind.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by jeff k
why does anyone ever need to do this? Shouldn't Apple have this perfected by now?
Spotlight works by getting notifications from the kernel about all directory changes. This is a form of dead reckoning: It knows where it starts (because Apple provides a database at install, or because it has trawled the entire directory structure in response to a reset event) and it knows what has changed, but it never rescans unless prompted. This means that if it misses a change event, the Spotlight database is wrong and it will never know and never correct it. In these cases it might be useful to force a rebuild.
|
The new Mac Pro has up to 30 MB of cache inside the processor itself. That's more than the HD in my first Mac. Somehow I'm still running out of space.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
Every time spotlight breaks (produces no results, just searching forever), which is generally 1-2x a year.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by mduell
Every time spotlight breaks (produces no results, just searching forever), which is generally 1-2x a year.
I had this the other day, and five minutes later, it worked again (though mdworker spiked the CPU in the meantime).
It would seem that Apple has fixed some of this in 10.8?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Thanks C, yes I have Easy find too. Good info here. I'm afraid, I will then probably do a force re-index, as how will I know it's broken and not indexing? Would be nice if some alert came up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot
I had this the other day, and five minutes later, it worked again (though mdworker spiked the CPU in the meantime).
It would seem that Apple has fixed some of this in 10.8?
I'm on 10.6.8, I can't stand the Lion/ML shit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by mduell
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot
I had this the other day, and five minutes later, it worked again (though mdworker spiked the CPU in the meantime).
It would seem that Apple has fixed some of this in 10.8?
I'm on 10.6.8, I can't stand the Lion/ML shit.
They fixed what was shit in Mountain Lion. Welcome to Rocksville.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
ML does seem to work better. It seems that Apple adds one annoying feature to every version of the OS, but the one for ML (minimum size for Finder windows) is easy enough to work around. The one visible plus from Lion - fullscreen with multiple desktops and gestures - is a real enough boost.
|
The new Mac Pro has up to 30 MB of cache inside the processor itself. That's more than the HD in my first Mac. Somehow I'm still running out of space.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|