|
|
Omniweb 5.1.1
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Omniweb was recently updated to 5.1.1, which is great to see. I love the browser, but this version is probably the most crash prone release I've ever used. I've found two bugs that crash Omniweb without fail
1) quickly hitting the command key a couple times
2) minimizing the window by any means...both command-m and double clicking on the title bar
I've submitted these via email to the Omni crew, but I know they peruse Macnn, so hopefully they can provide some input. Can anyone else duplicate my findings? And yeah, I've tried losing the plist and omniweb 5 folder
(
Last edited by superfula; Jul 21, 2005 at 01:54 AM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Trapped in the depths of my mind
Status:
Offline
|
|
I really liked OW, but in my experience in using it, from the 5.0 on til the latest version, it was unstable and crash-prone. Nothing is more annoying than a browser that is crash-prone. As much as I want to like OW again, I'm sticking with Safari this time. It's fast and reliable. I do miss the OW tabs though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seaford, Virginia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hasn't crashed on me yet. I've only had a few crashes, for some reason at Apple's quicktime movie site.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Springfield, MO
Status:
Offline
|
|
It's been fairly stable for me... but it's just so much slower than everything else (at least on my computer).
|
RedHerring: Trying to do more than convert air into carbon dioxide since 1979...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Aug 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by RedHerring
It's been fairly stable for me... but it's just so much slower than everything else (at least on my computer).
I totally agree with you. OW is a very flexible and pleasant browser to use , but the biggest shortcoming is speed . I just hope the next version of OW will be as fast as other browsers at least...then I won't be using other browsers unless definitely necessary .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well I got a reply back from Omni. Turns out if I disable WindowShade X, which I wasn't actually using anyway, the problems I saw no longer affect Omniweb. Good to know if wasn't just something in Omniweb causing the problems.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The rainy, rainy Northwest
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by superfula
Well I got a reply back from Omni. Turns out if I disable WindowShade X, which I wasn't actually using anyway, the problems I saw no longer affect Omniweb. Good to know if wasn't just something in Omniweb causing the problems.
Unsanity has a new version of WindowShade out (v4). Were you using that or a prior version? v4 supposedly corrected some problems in Tiger.
I'll also echo the speed comments. I'm hoping that the new Webkit version will speed things up. Kind of surprised that Omni hasn't already put that in there. Well, waiting for 5.2.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Springfield, MO
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by typ993
I'm hoping that the new Webkit version will speed things up. Kind of surprised that Omni hasn't already put that in there. Well, waiting for 5.2.
If I understand correctly, OmniWeb uses a modified version of WebCore. Some of OmniWeb's advanced features require additional coding/tweaking/changing/something that takes extra time to get in there.
I could be wrong, but I think that's why they can't just plunk the new version in there (even though I also think I read somewhere... maybe here... that they are thinking of switching to the standard version of WebCore in the future). Anyone else read that or did I just make all of this up? Haha
|
RedHerring: Trying to do more than convert air into carbon dioxide since 1979...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: NYC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well, for the record, superfula, I'm using the latest version of WindowShadeX and I don't get crashes.
My problem with OmniWeb under Tiger is that at random intervals--probably once or twice a minute--it beachballs for about five seconds while the hard drive chatters. Could this be a Spotlight indexing thing?
OmniWeb may be slower than other browsers; I don't know because I hate doing without OmniTabs and per-site preferences. It would take gross instability to pry me from OmniWeb.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
I had version 4 of WindowshadeX. It was just the eval that had long since expired. I just hadn't taken the time to get rid of it.
As far as page loading times, I really don't notice much of a difference amongst the browsers. Now the OW browser itself is a little heavier than Firefox or Camino, but it's worth it for me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: The rainy, rainy Northwest
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by RedHerring
If I understand correctly, OmniWeb uses a modified version of WebCore. Some of OmniWeb's advanced features require additional coding/tweaking/changing/something that takes extra time to get in there.
I could be wrong, but I think that's why they can't just plunk the new version in there (even though I also think I read somewhere... maybe here... that they are thinking of switching to the standard version of WebCore in the future). Anyone else read that or did I just make all of this up? Haha
Here's the reply I got from Troy at Omni:
We're beginning work on this now. The update process will take some time since before we were only using parts of WebKit but once complete it should be much easier to keep OmniWeb up to date with the latest changes. Sorry for the wait here.
So we'll still have a wait, but goodness will be in our future!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Nov 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
I totally regret going up to 5.1.1 I've had about 8 wipeouts now, Crashes where I have to hold power and reboot . But hey all those old pages are still there 5 minutes later when I'm back up GREAT .
Emails from Troy tell me to try my system (10.3.9) with haxies off. I use windowshadeX, Xsounds and Shapeshifter. I don't want to live without omniweb but it hurts me less to live without it than to switch of those haxies just in the hope that my system won't go down. How many other browsers are there ?
I am now 90% reliant on NetNewsWire having taken the time to set it up properly. I never appreciated how useful it was before.
I thought NNW and Omniweb both used webcore so didn't understand why OW was so crap, but Redherring pointed out Omni has fiddled with it. I wish they could get it right, I miss my OW. couldn't they ask unsanity for some help if they can't tinker in a good way
Anyhow I typed this in Safari, first time I've used it in at least 6 months. Life's a Bitch
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: macsterdam
Status:
Offline
|
|
Is there any news on Omniweb updates at all?? I totally love the browser but speed-wise it annoys the hell out of me. Any news at all Omni-guys?? A time-frame wouldn't hurt either.......
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Wow, speak of the devil. I was just about to post in this thread about any Omniweb updates coming.
I've been hopping around among Safari, Shiira, Camino, & Firefox simply because they're all faster, but none of them seem as good as Omniweb, IMO.
So WHEN IS the speed going to come to Omniweb, Omniguys?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: macsterdam
Status:
Offline
|
|
Me too - I do use other browsers but none are as good as OW5 except for speed
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kuna, ID USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
OW development seems to have just stalled into nothingness.
Maybe Safari killed it, who knows?
It has been near 3 months without an update and even that was just a tiny Tiger bug fix.
My guess is that OGs time is just more valuable on their other apps anymore.
T
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: London, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Safari hasn't killed OW (and the open sourcing of Webkit etc has more than likely breathed new life into it), but it is possible that OmniGroup are currently focussing on getting OmniGraffle 4.0 finished and released.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: macsterdam
Status:
Offline
|
|
I don't think Safari killed OW 5 either, but some feedback or time-schedule would be appreciated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: under about 12 feet of ash from Mt. Vesuvius
Status:
Offline
|
|
I don't notice a terribly big speed difference between OW and Safari.
|
i look in your general direction
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
OmniWeb 5.1.2 is right around the corner (we should have a beta out this week), but the bulk of OmniWeb's development time is currently going towards moving to WebKit for OmniWeb 5.5.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: London, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Thanks Ken
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: macsterdam
Status:
Offline
|
|
Thanks for the reply, Ken. Would it be possible to give a rough estimate as to when an Webkit-ready OW% would be available?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Seaford, Virginia
Status:
Offline
|
|
I know I asked this once before, but where is Omniweb located in Seattle? I was stationed up in Whidbey Island and thought Seattle was a beautiful city.
Plus, I love Omniweb. Still one of the nicest browsers I've ever used.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Ken at Omni
OmniWeb 5.1.2 is right around the corner (we should have a beta out this week), but the bulk of OmniWeb's development time is currently going towards moving to WebKit for OmniWeb 5.5.
Would it be rude of me to ask whether the bookmark crashing bug is being fixed in 5.2.2? It is driving me CRAZY!
(sent in at least 30 or so crash reports and a few emails).
BZ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by His Dudeness
I know I asked this once before, but where is Omniweb located in Seattle? I was stationed up in Whidbey Island and thought Seattle was a beautiful city.
Just north of University Village in the U District, overlooking the Burke-Gilman trail.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Sep 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by gregomni
Just north of University Village in the U District, overlooking the Burke-Gilman trail.
Oh great, here come the villagers with torches now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Sadly, the new beta does not solve my bookmark crashing bug.
BZ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: London, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
What is your bookmark crashing bug?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by JKT
What is your bookmark crashing bug?
One out of every 4 or so of my "Updated Bookmarks" when I click on it to check it or open it up into a tab, OmniWeb crashes.
Must have sent in at least 20 crash reports if not more.
BZ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: London, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
OK. Haven't experienced that myself, but then again I don't use the feature
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2004
Location: norway
Status:
Offline
|
|
is it still slow as hell?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: macsterdam
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well, it's no firefox
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Long Beach, California
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by nooon
is it still slow as hell?
Well. I have 5.1.2 now and to my opinion, it is slower than Camino.
But omniweb is WAY better with videos and Flash advertising.
Christian
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: .no
Status:
Offline
|
|
Why don't they use a newer (and faster) version of webcore in OW? It shouldn't have any problems getting the same speed as Safari..
(
Last edited by brutal; Oct 27, 2005 at 01:58 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
They are integrating the opensource WebKit into OmniWeb 5.5. It should be much faster, possibly even faster than the shipping Safari at the time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: May 2002
Location: England
Status:
Offline
|
|
Anyone else having stability issues in 5.1.2. I'm running tiger with all the latest updates and for me 5.1.1 was rock solid but now it seems to just crash once or twice a day for no very good reason. I think I may revert to 5.1.1 again.
regards,
Tam
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Thinine
They are integrating the opensource WebKit into OmniWeb 5.5. It should be much faster, possibly even faster than the shipping Safari at the time.
I feel like I have heard that more than a few times.
OmniWeb 5.1.2 crashes on RSS feeds and other little things. It is not living up to speed and at the end of the day, Safari is getting used more and more.
Come on OmniDudes... fix these crashers, bring the speed and lets get a top of the line browser out there again.
BZ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: ~/
Status:
Offline
|
|
I love the features of OmniWeb so much that I paid for a license some time ago. I just wish it wasn't so crash-prone. Speed wise, I can live with it since my machine itself is so fast, but the crash-per-hour thing has got to go.
OW could be my main and only browser if the stability issues could be ironed out.
|

|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: May 2002
Location: England
Status:
Offline
|
|
I agree. Personally, I'm not so bothered about speed, omniweb seems more than fast enough for me. And the features are second to none. But stability is a serious issue (at least omniweb remembers what sites you had open when you crash, which makes it bearable but still very annoying).
regard, Tam
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Long Beach, California
Status:
Offline
|
|
I also paid the $30 because I like omniweb a whole lot too but sometimes I feel like, I probably would have gave the money to homeless person.
I have a problem with speed. It's slow as dial up. That's so annoying.
Christian
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Long Beach, California
Status:
Offline
|
|
I also paid the $30 because I like omniweb a whole lot too but sometimes I feel like, I probably would have gave the money to homeless person.
I have a problem with speed. It's slow as dial up. That's so annoying.
Christian
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by athos_uk
(at least omniweb remembers what sites you had open when you crash, which makes it bearable but still very annoying).
regard, Tam
It does? Are you talking about a Workspace? They don't autosave on a crash to my knowledge. I know they don't for me. If OW crashes and I haven't taken a recent snap of the Workspace, all those extra pages are gone.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Portland, OR, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by superfula
It does? Are you talking about a Workspace? They don't autosave on a crash to my knowledge. I know they don't for me. If OW crashes and I haven't taken a recent snap of the Workspace, all those extra pages are gone.
Whether it autosaves or not is set on a per workspace basis in the Workspaces panel. Bring it up (cmd-ctrl-0) and check the "Auto-save while browsing" button.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Ah nice, thanks. I've never really messed with the workspace feature much.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by superfula
Well I got a reply back from Omni. Turns out if I disable WindowShade X, which I wasn't actually using anyway, the problems I saw no longer affect Omniweb. Good to know if wasn't just something in Omniweb causing the problems.
This is why I don't like haxies that much.
" This app sucks! It crashes all the time, unstable POS... oh wait... actually it was this haxie that was doing it"
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: London, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
I wrote a "What to do if OmniWeb is crashing" for the OmniWeb wiki. If OmniWeb is crashing a lot, try some of my suggestions here. Hopefully, they'll help.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Illinois
Status:
Offline
|
|
Keeping old versions of haxies around that you do not use = bad. Keep things like that up to date or expect crashes as the system changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Illinois
Status:
Offline
|
|
Keeping old versions of haxies around that you do not use = bad. Keep things like that up to date or expect crashes as the system changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: London, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Keeping any versions of haxies around = crashes in certain apps. OmniWeb is one of them, NeoOffice and other Java-based apps are others. Having APE and the haxies up-to-date doesn't mean squat for these apps. If people insist on using them, at the very least they should be aware that disabling them should be the first port of call for troubleshooting when things start going wrong with any apps or the system but, unfortunately, that just isn't the case for many.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jun 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by hoopz
My problem with OmniWeb under Tiger is that at random intervals--probably once or twice a minute--it beachballs for about five seconds while the hard drive chatters. Could this be a Spotlight indexing thing?
Your problem may be caused by a browser history file in ~/Library/Application Support/Omniweb 5 that grows relentlessly. Try clearing your history, quitting Omniweb, then manually deleting all files in the above-mentioned folder that start with "History".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|