Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Bill Gates on the Macintosh

Bill Gates on the Macintosh
Thread Tools
budster101
Baninated
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Illinois might be cold and flat, but at least it's ugly.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 7, 2005, 04:39 PM
 
RIPPED from the headlines of MacNN...

"MARCH 07, 2005 (COMPUTERWORLD) - Nearly a decade ago, just a few months after Microsoft shipped Windows 95, I asked Bill Gates if it was a conscious decision in the development of that product to give Windows more of a Mac look and feel. Of course I knew he'd say it wasn't, but I couldn't resist asking.

"There was no goal even to compete with Macintosh," Gates proclaimed. "We don't even think of Macintosh as a competitor."

That was a crock, so I pressed the issue a little. I asked him how he accounted for the widespread perception that Windows 95 looked a lot like Mac 88, and whether the similarity was just a coincidence. I didn't expect a sobbing confession of mimicry, but I thought it would be cool to see how he'd respond. Surprisingly enough, Gates shifted gears and became more forthcoming.

"Some of the things in Windows 95 the Mac had earlier," he acknowledged, citing long file names, plug-and-play capabilities and built-in peer-to-peer networking. You know that had to be tough for him, so when he proclaimed that "there's a ton of things even in Windows 3.1 that the Mac doesn't have, that someday they'll probably add to their system, too," I didn't have the heart to call him on it when he didn't cite any examples."...

More here: (Not much though)

Computerworld article link
     
mitchell_pgh
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2000
Location: Washington, DC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 7, 2005, 05:05 PM
 
I think they have more important things then go after the 3-4% that Apple has. Like make an OS that isn't a joke.
     
olePigeon
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 7, 2005, 05:28 PM
 
Originally posted by mitchell_pgh:
I think they have more important things then go after the 3-4% that Apple has. Like make an OS that isn't a joke.
When you command 90% of the market, does it matter? A lot of people have fallen into a "Microsoft only" solution with no way out. They take the crap and ask for more.
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
     
ort888
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Your Anus
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 7, 2005, 05:49 PM
 
Is this from some sort of timewarp? This is 10 years old.

Seriously though. M$ needs Apple around so they can claim they don't have a monopoly. It's in there best interest to make sure Apple stays right where they are.

I think Apple scares them a lot less then Linux at this point.

My sig is 1 pixel too big.
     
TubaMuffins
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Minneapolis
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 7, 2005, 05:54 PM
 
in (i believe the most recent) Fortune magazine, there is an interesting article on Apple. It also says that Micro$oft's original $150 million investment in Apple stock is now worth over $1 billion. So i think Gates has a lot of interest in seeing Apple thrive believing that at this time they are not a threat to Micro$soft.
     
Millennium
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 7, 2005, 05:55 PM
 
Originally posted by olePigeon:
When you command 90% of the market, does it matter? A lot of people have fallen into a "Microsoft only" solution with no way out. They take the crap and ask for more.
It's not that they have no way out, because except in a few small fields (those with no Mac programs covering the field at all) this isn't actually true. However, they believe they have no way out, and this has always been the real genius of Microsoft's marketing: pushing programs, not protocols, as "standards". These people don't understand the concept of interoperability, because Microsoft has convinced them that it is nothing but a myth.
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
     
chabig
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jun 1999
Location: Las Vegas, NV, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 7, 2005, 05:59 PM
 
The shares the Microsoft bought for $150 million in 1998 or so were sold a few years ago.

Chris
     
TubaMuffins
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Minneapolis
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 7, 2005, 06:05 PM
 
Originally posted by chabig:
The shares the Microsoft bought for $150 million in 1998 or so were sold a few years ago.

Chris
maybe i am interpreting it wrong

Fortune Magazine, Feb 21, 2005:
The two struck a deal in which Microsoft bought $150 million of Apple stock and promised to keep supplying Microsoft Office and Internet Explorer for the Mac, programs that made Apple's computers at least somewhat compatible with the PC world. (Microsoft's stake in Apple is now worth well over $1 billion.)
     
Goldfinger
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 7, 2005, 06:57 PM
 
Originally posted by TubaMuffins:
maybe i am interpreting it wrong
I think the article is wrong, as said the stock was sold AFAIK.

iMac 20" C2D 2.16 | Acer Aspire One | Flickr
     
Big Mac
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 7, 2005, 06:58 PM
 
It was reported on various places that M$ sold its non-voting shares a few years back.

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
ManOfSteal
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Outfield - #24
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 7, 2005, 09:19 PM
 
Bill Gates.

     
kemuri
Junior Member
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 51st State of America (D�n Eideann).
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 7, 2005, 09:37 PM
 
He's kinda right, though.

I love Billy.
Will you be voting in liars and murderers come May 5th? The US screwed up by voting in their very own little genocidal maniac. Will you? If Labour's own members are in disarray about the Iraq war, what does that tell you?
     
Apple Pro Underwear
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: NYC*Crooklyn
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 7, 2005, 09:42 PM
 
i like the idea of bill gates being forced to use Windows for the rest of his life
     
Truepop
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 7, 2005, 09:54 PM
 
Originally posted by ort888:
I think Apple scares them a lot less then Linux at this point.
that's what I think too.
     
Apple Pro Underwear
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: NYC*Crooklyn
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 7, 2005, 10:25 PM
 
Originally posted by Truepop:
that's what I think too.
actually, whats not to like about apple?

it's expensive, it's not a threat, it comes out with good ideas you can copy off of and when you do, 90% of people don't know apple enough that you stole it

i personally think there is room to co-exist. i know apple will never die. let losers and bitches use windows while you know where it's at


edit: i am a loser too because i am using windows for almost 6 months now...
     
SSharon
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Teaneck, NJ
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 7, 2005, 11:50 PM
 
Originally posted by Apple Pro Underwear:
i like the idea of bill gates being forced to use Windows for the rest of his life
I never thought about it like that. I think I will sleep better knowing this though. His money can buy him a lot, but to have to use windows, uchhh.
AT&T iPhone 5S and 6; 13" MBP; MDD G4.
     
MilkmanDan
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: My Powerbook, in Japan!
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 8, 2005, 02:44 AM
 
But can all his money buy him love?
     
Secret__Police
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: May 2003
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 8, 2005, 07:17 AM
 
Originally posted by MilkmanDan:
But can all his money buy him love?
I'm sure his wife Melinda loves Bill very much.
     
Big Mac
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 8, 2005, 07:33 AM
 
Originally posted by Secret__Police:
I'm sure his wife Melinda loves Bill very much.
Yeah, she adores his bills. . .

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
ReggieX
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, ON
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 8, 2005, 11:57 AM
 
What did Win 3.1 have that was so special? I still had to go back to DOS and reboot with a custom autoexec.bat file to play games.
The Lord said 'Peter, I can see your house from here.'
     
budster101  (op)
Baninated
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Illinois might be cold and flat, but at least it's ugly.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 8, 2005, 12:00 PM
 
Originally posted by ReggieX:
What did Win 3.1 have that was so special? I still had to go back to DOS and reboot with a custom autoexec.bat file to play games.
I remember that. Also, messing with the config files to make bootup more efficient, blah, blah, blah... I hate fcuking Windows. DOS was so much better, and still is.
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:49 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,