 |
 |
NB mac user OSX?
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Louisiana,US
Status:
Offline
|
|
I just purchased a G4 667 powermac with 768 megs of ram and 80 gig HD
it has a fresh install of 10.0.3 on it. Should I upgrade to Panther or leave it? I will be doing mainly photo editing and gaming. Thanks
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Earth
Status:
Offline
|
|
One word : YES.
10.0 is a snail. 10.1 was a much faster. 10.2 was even more faster. 10.3 is even more more more faster.
Your G4 will feel like a G5 when running 10.3 compared to 10.0.
In addition to performance, a lot of softwares now REQUIRE at least 10.2 to run.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: The Internets
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2000
Location: London, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
100%, update. No man in 2004 should suffer the pain of 10.0.3
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Sep 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Oh my lord, yes. 10 to 10.3 is completely night and day in every single way�speed, features, name anything!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top