 |
 |
Turning off drop shadows in Kaleidoscope 2.3???
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: May 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Is this something that can be done???? So that classic enviroment looks good when using it? I am still using quark 4.1 at work.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Did you try ShadowKiller (free) or WindowShade (shareware) from Unsanity?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Floreeda
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by eyevaan:
Did you try ShadowKiller (free) or WindowShade (shareware) from Unsanity?
........
:: sigh ::
should i let him have it boys? he seems so innocent...
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by fireside:
........
:: sigh ::
should i let him have it boys? he seems so innocent...
LET 'EM HAVE IT!!!!! ... just kidding. let him off with a warning this time. 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Somewhere in your mind.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by eyevaan:
Did you try ShadowKiller (free) or WindowShade (shareware) from Unsanity?
In case you don't understand why you are looking like a frozen pork chop to a hunger pack of wolves.. Those are OSX apps and not OS9... Notice the first post, Quark 4.1... ummm.... that would be, definitely be, OS9... 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Floreeda
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Dave-o�:
Notice the first post, Quark 4.1... ummm.... that would be, definitely be, OS9...
Notice the thread title. "Kaleidoscope"
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Houston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
how about just talking your boss into upgrading to an OS X compatible version of Quark, so you don't have to use classic mode?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: New Zealand
Status:
Offline
|
|
If I remember correctly...
only the drop down menus have drop shadows.
these can be edited in individual schemes relatively easily.
don't think it can be done as a generic setting for all schemes though.
|
D . R . A . G . O . N
.  .
T . O . N . G . U . E
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Status:
Offline
|
|
I still really think its funny when people have no idea where WindowShade actually came from... Mac OS 9...
: sigh :
|
|
8 Core 2.8 ghz Mac Pro/GF8800/2 23" Cinema Displays, 3.06 ghz Macbook Pro
Once you wanted revolution, now you're the institution, how's it feel to be the man?
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by goMac:
I still really think its funny when people have no idea where WindowShade actually came from... Mac OS 9...
: sigh :
We gonna play the konfabulator/dashboard game again?
First example of windowshading I remember using firsthand was a copland preview. Around the same time a mister "Aaron" released similar functionality for System 7.
Other windowing UI systems around that time also had implementations of similar functionality.
Woah. I just got way overly nitpicky - well I'm not gonna delete it but just to clarify
Windowshade ain't a X thing exclusively =)
|
|
I have no credentials whatsoever to post here.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by Dave-o�:
In case you don't understand why you are looking like a frozen pork chop to a hunger pack of wolves.. Those are OSX apps and not OS9... Notice the first post, Quark 4.1... ummm.... that would be, definitely be, OS9...
'kay'kay'kay'kay
got it
BUT doesn't the OSX shadow options apps also kill the K-scheme shadows?
I have not tried running Kscope in classic with OSX running - I always have used themes...
so to finally answer ajaimes question . . . is it answered?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Somewhere in your mind.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by eyevaan:
'kay'kay'kay'kay
got it
BUT doesn't the OSX shadow options apps also kill the K-scheme shadows?
I have not tried running Kscope in classic with OSX running - I always have used themes...
so to finally answer ajaimes question . . . is it answered?
I would yes that it is, the haxie's are not going to have an effect on the classic system nor the K-Sheme.. I'll prolly be wrong about this, since i'm answering from a memory over 2 years ago.. but hey i'm wearing fire resistant clothing...
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by BurningBright:
We gonna play the konfabulator/dashboard game again?
First example of windowshading I remember using firsthand was a copland preview. Around the same time a mister "Aaron" released similar functionality for System 7.
Other windowing UI systems around that time also had implementations of similar functionality.
Woah. I just got way overly nitpicky - well I'm not gonna delete it but just to clarify
Windowshade ain't a X thing exclusively =)
Windowshade came as part of the Windowshade control panel as part of System 7.5 iirc.  It was implemented by double clicking on the menu bar. I remember my PowerMac 6500 running 7.6.1 had it installed, so did the Powerbook 5300's I've worked with.
Mac OS 8 actually implemented a title bar button.
My comment implied that Windowshade was coded by Apple, and has certainly been around long before X.
|
|
8 Core 2.8 ghz Mac Pro/GF8800/2 23" Cinema Displays, 3.06 ghz Macbook Pro
Once you wanted revolution, now you're the institution, how's it feel to be the man?
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: May 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
even if i turn off shadows for some reason kaledeidoscope still draws the menus extended,
and i know that using classic with kaleidoscope just draws the menus to the edge
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Felton, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by BurningBright:
We gonna play the konfabulator/dashboard game again?
First example of windowshading I remember using firsthand was a copland preview. Around the same time a mister "Aaron" released similar functionality for System 7.
Other windowing UI systems around that time also had implementations of similar functionality.
Woah. I just got way overly nitpicky - well I'm not gonna delete it but just to clarify
Windowshade ain't a X thing exclusively =)
Windowshade was a freeware program (yes another one, not called Windowshade X) that installed as a control panel onto System 6 or System 7.0-7.1. Windowshade is still availiable at ftp://ftp.cs.tu-berlin.de/pub/mac/sys/init/. Download file Windowshade 1.1... You may need vMac/Mini vMac and an old System ( http://download.info.apple.com/Apple.../System_6.0.x/) has System 6.)
It was then brought out by Apple and included with system 7.5/7.6 (Download System 7.5.3 at http://download.info.apple.com/Apple...ersion_7.5.3/.)
Mac OS 8 added the button on the right side and integrated it into the System better.
|
|
Trainiable is to cat as ability to live without food is to human.
Steveis... said: "What would scammers do with this info..." talking about a debit card number!
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by ajaime:
Is this something that can be done???? So that classic enviroment looks good when using it? I am still using quark 4.1 at work.
The shadows are scheme-specific. You can edit the scheme to get rid fo them. A screenshot would be very help to see just what it is you're wanting to "fix"
|
|
20" iMac C2D/2.4GHz 3GB RAM 10.6.8 (10H549)
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top