Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Software - Troubleshooting and Discussion > macOS > Snow leopard: Release

Snow leopard: Release (Page 3)
Thread Tools
olePigeon
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 7, 2009, 12:04 AM
 
Originally Posted by Hawkeye_a View Post
I do think that 10.5 is feature complete (for my needs), and that the optimizations coming in SL will be awesome. But i have to confess that ive always felt that optimizations should come in incremental updates as opposed to the major updates.

Cheers
Well, Snow Leopard may be more optimized, but Apple is also replacing the kernel with a 64-bit clean kernel. OpenCL and Grand Central should speed up things nicely. I think it's quite a bit more than just optimizations. It's like upgrading from 32-bit XP to 64-bit XP.

My work will be getting an educational ADC license so all us techs can get all the beta software. I can't wait to see what all the fuss is about.
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
     
OreoCookie
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 7, 2009, 03:59 AM
 
What Simon said. I'm not saying that OS X is insecure. But if you look at the recent security conferences where popular browsers, etc. were hacked, it turned out that it's much harder to use exploits to your advantage on Windows* because of improvements MS has included.

* That means even if there is a vulnerability, it is hard to use it to execute malicious code. One of these mechanisms is to use random memory addresses, for instance. Since some *BSDs include that feature, I find it likely that Apple may include this as well.
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
     
P
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 7, 2009, 05:25 AM
 
(ASLR)

Originally Posted by - - e r i k - - View Post
I thought Leopard already had this:
The feature is there, but it is not implemented for a lot of libs - most importantly, dyld. As long as it is not implemented for dyld, you can still use any feature dyld controls, and that includes loading any dynamic library and use features from it. Hopefully Apple will make all system libraries use ASLR in SL.

The same goes for some of the other Leopard features, like sandboxing: Add rules for everything and the kitchen sink to make the feature work, and we'll have a much more secure OS.
The new Mac Pro has up to 30 MB of cache inside the processor itself. That's more than the HD in my first Mac. Somehow I'm still running out of space.
     
olePigeon
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 7, 2009, 11:51 AM
 
Originally Posted by OreoCookie View Post
What Simon said. I'm not saying that OS X is insecure. But if you look at the recent security conferences where popular browsers, etc. were hacked, it turned out that it's much harder to use exploits to your advantage on Windows* because of improvements MS has included.

* That means even if there is a vulnerability, it is hard to use it to execute malicious code. One of these mechanisms is to use random memory addresses, for instance. Since some *BSDs include that feature, I find it likely that Apple may include this as well.
Is it Safari or the OS?
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
     
OreoCookie
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 7, 2009, 12:23 PM
 
Both: they are using a vulnerability in Safari to take over the OS. If memory address randomization and sandboxing (as well as other techniques) had been implemented consistently, then the vulnerabilities in Safari (or Firefox or any other app) would still be there, but they would not allow you to take over the system.

Apple has very good reason to wanting to implement this sooner than later: the iPhone (although, AFAIK, the iPhone is more effectively protected via sandboxes). And if the Mac gets more popular as a desktop platform, it may have critical mass to become an interesting target for hackers.
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
     
Hawkeye_a
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 7, 2009, 12:43 PM
 
Originally Posted by olePigeon View Post
Well, Snow Leopard may be more optimized, but Apple is also replacing the kernel with a 64-bit clean kernel. OpenCL and Grand Central should speed up things nicely. I think it's quite a bit more than just optimizations. It's like upgrading from 32-bit XP to 64-bit XP.

My work will be getting an educational ADC license so all us techs can get all the beta software. I can't wait to see what all the fuss is about.
Oh i agree, from my standpoint (Software developer)...the changes/refinements/optimization that have been announced in SL are justification enough to buy the system.

But for the general public, it'll look like nothing has changed (superficially).... and when put up against the media barrage that Windows7 will get, it'll seem like the changes are almost insignificant.

From the tech angle, it's awesome. from the marketing perspective it might not be, especially when going up against windows7 (which is probably mostly superficial changes).
     
Chuckit
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 7, 2009, 01:42 PM
 
I'm not too worried about Microsoft beating Apple on marketing. Apple's marketing is brilliant and successful almost without exception while Microsoft's idea of a good commercial is not sticking their foot too far in their mouth.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Simon
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 7, 2009, 02:36 PM
 
Originally Posted by Chuckit View Post
I'm not too worried about Microsoft beating Apple on marketing. Apple's marketing is brilliant and successful almost without exception while Microsoft's idea of a good commercial is not sticking their foot too far in their mouth.
Seconded. MS is playing catch-up anyway. Even if Win 7 were to behave/look/feel/seem more like Leopard, they'll still be behind. As pretty much always.

But they're revamping the Zune this year. So all's fine in MS land.
     
olePigeon
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 7, 2009, 03:15 PM
 
Microsoft is also running those price comparison commercials.
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
     
Person Man
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northwest Ohio
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 7, 2009, 04:52 PM
 
Originally Posted by Hawkeye_a View Post
But for the general public, it'll look like nothing has changed (superficially).... and when put up against the media barrage that Windows7 will get, it'll seem like the changes are almost insignificant.
I disagree, especially if Apple overhauls the GUI as they are rumored to be doing. The difference between Windows 7 and Vista is very minor.
     
Salty
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 7, 2009, 05:25 PM
 
I'm sure Apple will have one wizz bang feature to make people notice it's a new OS. My guess is that changing the theme will allow them to keep it unwraps while still having developers play with features.
     
AppleGirl1990  (op)
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jan 2008
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 9, 2009, 04:42 PM
 
SL's big feature is going to be Blu-Ray support.
Good enough for me!
MAC PRO: Two 3.2GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon 5400 processors
ATI Radeon HD 4870 with 512MB of GDDR5 memory
1600MHz, 64-bit dual independent frontside bus
16 Gigs (4x4) of 800MHz DDR2 memory
     
Spheric Harlot
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 9, 2009, 04:46 PM
 
     
OreoCookie
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 9, 2009, 04:46 PM
 
Originally Posted by Person Man View Post
I disagree, especially if Apple overhauls the GUI as they are rumored to be doing. The difference between Windows 7 and Vista is very minor.
In terms of UI elements, perhaps, but things like UAC have been improved greatly (to the degree it might actually be usable and not just a nuisance).
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
     
SpaceMonkey
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 10, 2009, 09:56 AM
 
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot View Post
That must be one hell of a video she's shot.

"One ticket to Washington, please. I have a date with destiny."
     
turtle777
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 10, 2009, 12:50 PM
 
Darn it Apple, I want to buy a new MB or MBP, but I'm not doing it until SL is out.

-t
     
AppleGirl1990  (op)
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jan 2008
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 10, 2009, 03:51 PM
 
Turtle, not to get too far off topic, you can honestly tell me that you like the new track pad on the MB and MBP?
If i can't use my left hand to click and my right hand to drag......i'll go insane!

I miss that that click button!
MAC PRO: Two 3.2GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon 5400 processors
ATI Radeon HD 4870 with 512MB of GDDR5 memory
1600MHz, 64-bit dual independent frontside bus
16 Gigs (4x4) of 800MHz DDR2 memory
     
turtle777
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 10, 2009, 10:34 PM
 
Originally Posted by AppleGirl1990 View Post
Turtle, not to get too far off topic, you can honestly tell me that you like the new track pad on the MB and MBP?
Uhm, no I CAN'T. Like I said, I'm INTENDING to buy a new MB or MBP, I don't own one yet.

-t
     
lpkmckenna
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 11, 2009, 02:03 AM
 
SL will be released in September.

There will be surprises, like annoying interface changes and some needed tweaking to older features. I'll bet the new Finder will get full-screen CoverFlow like iTunes, and TimeMachine will be more configurable, for instance.

But Apple is gonna market SL as fast.
     
SpaceMonkey
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Washington, DC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 11, 2009, 11:12 AM
 
Originally Posted by lpkmckenna View Post
But Apple is gonna market SL as fast.
That's good. We haven't had a Snappy™ thread in a while.

"One ticket to Washington, please. I have a date with destiny."
     
AppleGirl1990  (op)
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jan 2008
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 11, 2009, 02:18 PM
 
I find coverflow to be a total waste. You find me someone who actually uses it on a daily basis and i'll find you a sunflower sucker.
MAC PRO: Two 3.2GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon 5400 processors
ATI Radeon HD 4870 with 512MB of GDDR5 memory
1600MHz, 64-bit dual independent frontside bus
16 Gigs (4x4) of 800MHz DDR2 memory
     
B Gallagher
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: New Zealand
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 11, 2009, 03:32 PM
 
I use it occasionally for pictures, but usual I find myself going back to the Icon View with the Icons at 128x128. If I want to make anything bigger, then that's exactly what Quick Look is for.
MBP 15" C2D 2.2GHz 4.0GB 500GB@5400
iPhone 4 32GB Black
     
cwkmacuser
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Northern California--SF Bay Area
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 11, 2009, 04:03 PM
 
Originally Posted by AppleGirl1990 View Post
Turtle, not to get too far off topic, you can honestly tell me that you like the new track pad on the MB and MBP?
If i can't use my left hand to click and my right hand to drag......i'll go insane!

I miss that that click button!
I'd miss the button too! One of my teachers in school uses a PowerBook G4 and she actually uses one hand for moving the trackpad and the other for the mouse button. I've never seen anyone else do it. I won't be upgrading my Apple laptop for several years. If I decide to get a second mac, I'd probably go with a desktop computer!
Chris K.
White MacBook and iPod Nano 3rd Generation
Experienced Mac User
Don't hold me accountable for jokes-I have a lousy sense of humor!
     
Big Mac
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 11, 2009, 10:46 PM
 
Can you just use a mouse with your MacBook if it bothers you that much?

I agree that the new button-less trackpad seems somewhat annoying, however.

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
cgc
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Down by the river
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 12, 2009, 12:54 AM
 
Originally Posted by B Gallagher View Post
I use it occasionally for pictures, ... If I want to make anything bigger, then that's exactly what Quick Look is for.
Good point...CoverFlow is good for going through your porn collection to pick the keepers...
     
bballe336
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: MA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 12, 2009, 01:29 AM
 
Originally Posted by Big Mac View Post
Can you just use a mouse with your MacBook if it bothers you that much?

I agree that the new button-less trackpad seems somewhat annoying, however.
It still has a physical click, so you can still click and drag. I agree with you though, it seems like a pretty silly thing to complain about (especially since the new trackpad is functionally just as capable as the old one).
     
jogi
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 12, 2009, 04:39 AM
 
Originally Posted by bballe336 View Post
It still has a physical click, so you can still click and drag. I agree with you though, it seems like a pretty silly thing to complain about (especially since the new trackpad is functionally just as capable as the old one).
I second this. The trackpad clicks and behaves just like the one button trackpad. It is even better in some ways as it's much bigger and you can click anywhere on the surface instead of just at the bottom part.
Macbook Pro Unibody 2.4Ghz
     
cwkmacuser
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Northern California--SF Bay Area
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 12, 2009, 01:57 PM
 
Yeah, but I prefer to sit with the computer on my lap and use the track pad (unless I am on the train or at a hotel, in which case I put it on a table) So, as a primary track pad user, I would not want to have a MacBook without a mouse button! Shall we go back to SL now?--NOT AN INSULT--Just wondering!
Chris K.
White MacBook and iPod Nano 3rd Generation
Experienced Mac User
Don't hold me accountable for jokes-I have a lousy sense of humor!
     
Spheric Harlot
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 12, 2009, 03:14 PM
 
Originally Posted by cwkmacuser View Post
Yeah, but I prefer to sit with the computer on my lap and use the track pad (unless I am on the train or at a hotel, in which case I put it on a table) So, as a primary track pad user, I would not want to have a MacBook without a mouse button!
There is absolutely NO difference in usage for what's been described here. Do EXACTLY what you would with your current trackpad, and you will never notice the change.
     
Cold Warrior
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Polwaristan
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 12, 2009, 03:19 PM
 
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot View Post
There is absolutely NO difference in usage for what's been described here. Do EXACTLY what you would with your current trackpad, and you will never notice the change.
This is good advice. I tell everyone I know who gets a new macbook to use a finger-thumb combo: finger(s) on the trackpad, thumb at the bottom of it for clicking. Or the two-handed technique where the second hand's finger is used for clicking the bottom. It's really no different from having a button, yet you get more space.
     
cwkmacuser
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Northern California--SF Bay Area
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 12, 2009, 05:03 PM
 
So you can do it with one hand?
Chris K.
White MacBook and iPod Nano 3rd Generation
Experienced Mac User
Don't hold me accountable for jokes-I have a lousy sense of humor!
     
CharlesS
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 12, 2009, 05:14 PM
 
I don't own one of the unibody machines, but I've played with them a few times and honestly, if I had my eyes closed, it'd be difficult for me to tell the difference. They work and feel exactly the same as the old one, and you can definitely use them with one hand, or two if you prefer.

I have to admit that I'm not sure what this discussion is doing in a Snow Leopard thread, though.

Ticking sound coming from a .pkg package? Don't let the .bom go off! Inspect it first with Pacifist. Macworld - five mice!
     
Cold Warrior
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Polwaristan
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 12, 2009, 06:39 PM
 
Fair enough. Let's all get this train back on track.
     
AppleGirl1990  (op)
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jan 2008
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 12, 2009, 10:59 PM
 
Sorry. My fault!

Back to Snowy L.
Here is something for you to think about.

SL is suppose to be a total re-write of the OS and apps to support 64bit and multiple-cores. As with any re-write, it will have bugs as it's new and untested. So since SL is being marketed as a more stable OS, doesn't that contradict itself and what it shall become? Inherently, it will have more problems than the current OS which has had 6 updates to dates.

That's like Microsoft saying that Windows 7 will be more stable. Nobody really knows until it's in the hands of the masses and of course, it will have lots of bugs as a totally new OS (although, Windows 7 is essentially Vista with updates).
MAC PRO: Two 3.2GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon 5400 processors
ATI Radeon HD 4870 with 512MB of GDDR5 memory
1600MHz, 64-bit dual independent frontside bus
16 Gigs (4x4) of 800MHz DDR2 memory
     
Big Mac
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 13, 2009, 12:45 AM
 
Blargh.

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
Simon
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 13, 2009, 04:06 AM
 
SL is not a total rewrite. Never was announced to be that. Never will be that.
     
AppleGirl1990  (op)
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jan 2008
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 13, 2009, 08:03 AM
 
But nobody will deny that it is a major overhaul of the OS and therefore, it shall be buggy (as is all newly written software).

My point was......since we can't can't rely on SL to be super stable.....we really do need a new "feature" to blow our minds and take our thoughts away from the fact that our super stable OS is crashing/not functioning as it should.

New features distract the end user.
MAC PRO: Two 3.2GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon 5400 processors
ATI Radeon HD 4870 with 512MB of GDDR5 memory
1600MHz, 64-bit dual independent frontside bus
16 Gigs (4x4) of 800MHz DDR2 memory
     
Spheric Harlot
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 13, 2009, 08:11 AM
 
Which part of "much faster" are you failing to take into account?
     
Simon
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 13, 2009, 08:35 AM
 
New GUI skin should be distraction enough.

Of course that won't work with people that frequent a board like this one, but it will do the trick for 95% of regular computer users.
     
Chuckit
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 13, 2009, 12:44 PM
 
Originally Posted by AppleGirl1990 View Post
But nobody will deny that it is a major overhaul of the OS and therefore, it shall be buggy (as is all newly written software).
It seems quite likely that Apple will debug Snow Leopard at some point before it's due to be released.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
turtle777
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 13, 2009, 01:31 PM
 
Originally Posted by Chuckit View Post
It seems quite likely that Apple will debug Snow Leopard at some point before it's due to be released.
Although this hasn't been been completely the case in the past, it seems that the delay of SL could hint at Apple making sure that everything works as advertised.

-t
     
Spheric Harlot
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 13, 2009, 01:54 PM
 
Originally Posted by Simon View Post
New GUI skin should be distraction enough.

Of course that won't work with people that frequent a board like this one, but it will do the trick for 95% of regular computer users.
The kind of people who frequent a board like this will probably find *plenty* of good reasons for upgrading to Snow Leopard (see this thread).
     
Simon
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 13, 2009, 03:15 PM
 
Sure. Which is why they won't be needing the 'distraction' in the first place.
     
CharlesS
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 13, 2009, 03:33 PM
 
Originally Posted by AppleGirl1990 View Post
But nobody will deny that it is a major overhaul of the OS and therefore, it shall be buggy (as is all newly written software).
The "overhaul" is in the area of bug fixes and performance improvements. If Apple does this release right, it should be the most stable of all .0 releases to date. If it's not stable, it will have been a failure as a release and will probably not sell.

Ticking sound coming from a .pkg package? Don't let the .bom go off! Inspect it first with Pacifist. Macworld - five mice!
     
AppleGirl1990  (op)
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jan 2008
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 13, 2009, 04:12 PM
 
How much more stable can they make it. I haven't had a system crash in over a year.
MAC PRO: Two 3.2GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon 5400 processors
ATI Radeon HD 4870 with 512MB of GDDR5 memory
1600MHz, 64-bit dual independent frontside bus
16 Gigs (4x4) of 800MHz DDR2 memory
     
Chuckit
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 13, 2009, 04:52 PM
 
Originally Posted by AppleGirl1990 View Post
How much more stable can they make it. I haven't had a system crash in over a year.
We're better off than Tiger, but it's still possible to completely break your networking and require a complete restart before you can mount a server again.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Spheric Harlot
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 13, 2009, 05:26 PM
 
^ Happened to me just yesterday, in fact. Been very rare, but that was weird.
     
TheoCryst
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 13, 2009, 06:40 PM
 
Am I the only one that wonders what happened to vector independence and QuartzGL (née Quartz 2D Extreme)? Both were promised for Leopard, and both simply fell by the wayside, never to be heard from again. Here's hoping that they're both still in active development -- QuartzGL is still ridiculously buggy in Leopard, and resolution independence is nowhere to be found.

<speculation>
I wonder if the deprecation of QuickDraw and the virtual abandonment of HIToolbox is related to either of these? I've been told that Snow Leopard will be Carbon-free upon final release (recent builds have even sported a primarily-Cocoa Finder), though we still don't really know what that means exactly (deprecating HIToolbox? no new Carbon development? all built-in apps ported to Cocoa?). Maybe that's one of the big new features: resolution independence, but only for Cocoa applications. Anything still using QuickDraw (and even HIToolbox?) would simply be left in the lurch, including Office 2008 and Adobe CS4.
</speculation>

Any ramblings are entirely my own, and do not represent those of my employers, coworkers, friends, or species
     
AppleGirl1990  (op)
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jan 2008
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 13, 2009, 07:20 PM
 
again. i'm in the mood for warm cookies...
MAC PRO: Two 3.2GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon 5400 processors
ATI Radeon HD 4870 with 512MB of GDDR5 memory
1600MHz, 64-bit dual independent frontside bus
16 Gigs (4x4) of 800MHz DDR2 memory
     
TheoCryst
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 13, 2009, 07:24 PM
 
Originally Posted by AppleGirl1990 View Post
again. i'm in the mood for warm cookies...
I've been known to have that effect on people...

...dammit, now I want cookies.

Any ramblings are entirely my own, and do not represent those of my employers, coworkers, friends, or species
     
 
Thread Tools
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:25 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,