 |
 |
Tiger or Leopard?
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Mesa, AZ
Status:
Offline
|
|
For using on a Powerbook G4 1.5ghz with 2 gigs of ram and a 64 meg ati radeon graphics card? Any suggestions? I have access to both, but from what I remember, 10.4 was the speediest for this machine, and 10.5 starting taking advantage of the intel processing. I just had my Macbook Pro 2.4ghz stolen last week but I was able to find this machine to use until I can reinvest in the future and was just looking to run it at optimal speed. Any comments or suggestions are recommended, thanks!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Leopard will be a tad slower but I'd still recommend it for it's improved feature set and more future-proof nature.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator  Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Polwaristan
Status:
Offline
|
|
It's an oxymoron to put a future-proof OS on a no-future platform (PowerPC). 
But you're right from the software/OS perspective. There are apps out there that will run on Leopard only or their newer versions may not support 10.4. Of course their old versions may run on 10.4, but that defeats the purpose of upgrades. For example, it appears version 1.0 of the popular media player VLC will be 10.5 or later only.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Mesa, AZ
Status:
Offline
|
|
so are we saying that it is worth the upgrade to 10.5? I have seen a lot of my favorite apps being produced only for 10.5 now. I think this machine should last until the next update of the macbook pro series in jan. So until then, 10.5 is the way to go? Still looking for some other opinions on this matter. Thanks guys!
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top