|
|
MacBook: Pay more for ATI?
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jun 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
I know this is the bigget issue with the MacBook, that the GPU sucks on ice. So my question is, would you pay extra for an ATI X1600 64MB GPU as a BTO (or standard on the black model, and how much would you be willing to pay (say $50 bucks more)?
I think there should be a BTO option on the two white models, and/or standard on the black model. Even if there wasn't an BTO option and the high end black one had it standard, then Apple couldn't make them fast enough.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
I would pay more, but wouldn't expect an X1600. That would cost a lot more, and I don't think it's justified for a low end Mac laptop.
X300 is sufficient, even if it were using shared memory. In one way, the X300 could be more beneficial too, because with 32 MB dedicated RAM, it can use a total of 128 MB RAM, while still keeping costs down. That would be nice for those doing 2D applications on large external screens, and who don't need to be cranking out top 3D speeds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Bay Area
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm with Wanker.
No need for games on my laptop. PC workhorse should be used for that. If I had unlimited $$ and wanted a mobile game rig - Alienware would get the call.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: NYC
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'da paid an extra $200 for a decent mobile graphics chipset! Grrr...
|
*justin
Isn't logic swell? It gives answers without really answering anything!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jul 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
An X1600 in a 13.3" would be amazing as the smallest laptop with a X1600 is the ASUS W3j, 14" WideScreen, however, I suspect that would cause major heat problems, as the W3j's X1600 has some issues with heat and it's underclocked a bit, it also barely fits, so that physical barrier would be a bit difficult to get around.
A dedicated graphics option would be very nice, I'm not sure if I could see Apple justifying this from a financial aspect though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
I would've paid between $50-100 just for a X300.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
I don't really know the differences between the models, but I'd definitely pay more for a dedicated graphics chip.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
If you pay more for a better GPU, you're almost at the low-end MBP. Apple won't do this as it means another BTO motherboard.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by danengel
If you pay more for a better GPU, you're almost at the low-end MBP. Apple won't do this as it means another BTO motherboard.
Yeah but I don't need the size of the MBP, and I'm sure a lot of other people think the same thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by
Yeah but I don't need the size of the MBP, and I'm sure a lot of other people think the same thing.
That's why I'm waiting for the MacBook Thin...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: las vegas
Status:
Offline
|
|
almost makes one wonder if a 13" macbook pro is in thwe works.
i really can't imagine what the techies at apple were thinking when they decided to use the intel gpu on the mini and the macbook. this really seems to go against all the good things they've come out with in the past. can you play a hdtv movie trailer from apple's trailer site on a macbook?
i wonder how the graphics chips in the last ibooks (12 and 14") compare to the macbok. cabn you even play call of duty on a macbook? what about warcraft?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jul 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
I would highly doubt that, Apple seems to be advertising that 'the family is complete' all over its site in different ways, that is, of Apple's mobile units.
Yes, video playback, regardless of the quality isn't exactly GPU intensive, it's more 3D CAD anf gamers who will suffer from this. The intel integrated cards were made for the regular user, they'd do anything most people will throw at them, which is just simple stuff..
It's better, though it is integrated, the iBook's card is reletively old technology.
Yes and yes.
Here's a list of which games the Macbook can run;
http://support.intel.com/support/gra.../CS-021400.htm
If it's older and not on the list, it will most likely run.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
I think this is why that didn't happen: The current BlackBook goes for $1499. Now, if you add the BTO option for something like an X300 with 32 or even 64MB you're looking at an entirely different motherboard that's needed. Sudenely Apple needs to design, produce and stock two motherboard types. So we're talking about a markup of probably $200 (remeber, a black case costs $150 ). That brings us to $1699. Well, who in their right mind would buy a 13" MB for $1699 when they could be getting a 15" MBP for $1999 that offers a higher res screen, better GPU, better BTO options and a slicker case? Probably not many. And Apple knows that. And because they want a compact and simple line-up, there's no GPU BTO option.
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by roosta
almost makes one wonder if a 13" macbook pro is in thwe works.
i really can't imagine what the techies at apple were thinking when they decided to use the intel gpu on the mini and the macbook. this really seems to go against all the good things they've come out with in the past. can you play a hdtv movie trailer from apple's trailer site on a macbook?
i wonder how the graphics chips in the last ibooks (12 and 14") compare to the macbok. cabn you even play call of duty on a macbook? what about warcraft?
Well, funnily enough, the Core Duos can play HD video perfectly. Where my 2.1GHz G5 with a 256MB ATI card will choke on a 1080p video, the Macbook with its GMA950 will play it without dropping a frame.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by dazzla
Well, funnily enough, the Core Duos can play HD video perfectly. Where my 2.1GHz G5 with a 256MB ATI card will choke on a 1080p video, the Macbook with its GMA950 will play it without dropping a frame.
IIRC, all G5 iMacs came with a 128MB card, and the last revision (1.9 ghz and 2.1 ghz) came with X600's
|
iMac Core Duo 1.83 Ghz | 1.25GB RAM | 160HD, MacBook Core Duo 1.83 Ghz | 13.3" | 60HD | 1.0GB RAM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Spot on, just checked system profiler and it's a 128MB X600.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Simon
I think this is why that didn't happen: The current BlackBook goes for $1499. Now, if you add the BTO option for something like an X300 with 32 or even 64MB you're looking at an entirely different motherboard that's needed. Sudenely Apple needs to design, produce and stock two motherboard types. So we're talking about a markup of probably $200 (remeber, a black case costs $150 ). That brings us to $1699. Well, who in their right mind would buy a 13" MB for $1699 when they could be getting a 15" MBP for $1999 that offers a higher res screen, better GPU, better BTO options and a slicker case? Probably not many. And Apple knows that. And because they want a compact and simple line-up, there's no GPU BTO option.
Who says they need to keep the $150 premium just to have a black case? Maybe the $200 for a different mobo/video card is premium enough.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by
Who says they need to keep the $150 premium just to have a black case? Maybe the $200 for a different mobo/video card is premium enough.
I'm in a close business. Believe me, a different BTO motherboard is way too expensive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by dazzla
I would've paid between $50-100 just for a X300.
Same.
Originally Posted by harrisjamieh
IIRC, all G5 iMacs came with a 128MB card
The first G5 iMacs came with the 64 MB GeForce 5200 Ultra. I did not buy that iMac, partially because of this specific reason. I waited until the next iteration, which got the 128 MB Radeon 9600. I'm glad I did too, because Aperture is not supported on the 1st version of the G5 iMac, but is supported on mine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|