Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Political/War Lounge > Should the US call in Iran and Syria to help stabilise Iraq?

Should the US call in Iran and Syria to help stabilise Iraq?
Thread Tools
Taliesin
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 18, 2006, 07:04 AM
 
That's one of the alternatives Baker's commission that is investigating the failures in the handling of Iraq by the US, are pondering to propose, and Iraq's president Talabani favors that one, too. Here is the full text:


Talabani backs 'Iran-Syria plan'

Violence in Iraq could end "within months" if Iran and Syria joined efforts to stabilise the country, says Iraqi President Jalal Talabani.

He told the BBC the move would "be the beginning of the end of terrorism".

The idea for the US to open talks with Iran and Syria over Iraq is said to be under consideration by a panel of experts examining US policy on Iraq.

The panel, led by a former US secretary of state, is also said to think that "staying the course" is untenable.



However, Mr Talabani said was not worried by reports that James Baker's panel may recommend an early - or phased - withdrawal of coalition troops from Iraq.

"I'm sure that no-one will decide to pull out quickly in Iraq," he told the BBC's Jim Muir.

'Alternative approach'

Mr Baker's commission, which is due to report in the next few months, is reportedly considering recommending significant changes.


The task force, which was asked by the US Congress to examine the effectiveness of American policy in Iraq, has reportedly been looking at the two options - a possible phased withdrawal of troops and involvement of Iran and Syria.

Mr Baker, who was secretary of state under President George Bush, the current president's father, has so far stressed that the panel has not come to a definitive conclusion.

But he has indicated the direction of the panel's thinking in recent television interviews.

"Our commission believes that there are alternatives between the stated alternatives, the ones that are out there in the political debate of 'stay the course' and 'cut and run,'" he told ABC News recently.

In a separate development British Prime Minister Tony Blair said that British forces will not "walk away" from Iraq or Afghanistan until their job there is done.

Referring to Mr Baker's report, Mr Blair said he would be "absolutely astonished" if it set out plans to "get out of Iraq come what may".
Source: BBC NEWS | Americas | Talabani backs 'Iran-Syria plan'

Here is an interview with Talabani: BBC NEWS | Middle East | Talabani interview: Full text

What do you think? Is it possible to stabilise Iraq in the way Talabani wishes (see interview for that)? And what you think about the Baker-commision and its possible advise to invite Iran and Syria to help in stabilising Iraq?

Taliesin
     
Sky Captain
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Second star to the right, and straight on till morning
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Oct 18, 2006, 07:33 AM
 
What's wrong with just asking Syria and Iran to stop sending insurgents?
All men are created equal, but what they do after that point puts them on a sliding scale.
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:27 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,