Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > News > Tech News > Judge approves $450M e-book settlement between Apple, states [u]

Judge approves $450M e-book settlement between Apple, states [u]
Thread Tools
NewsPoster
MacNN Staff
Join Date: Jul 2012
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 21, 2014, 05:07 PM
 
[Updated with additional background information, details on "escape clause"] Federal court Judge Denise Cote has approved Apple's $450 million e-book suit settlement offer with US states. The agreement, proposed in June, will settle allegations made in 33 states and territories, with $400 million potentially reaching customers affected by the "price fixing conspiracy." The agreements only settles the states' complaints, with the publishers' settlements remaining discrete. However, Apple may have an ace up its sleeve on the deal -- in the form of a "vindication" clause.

The company was found by the judge in a bench trial to have colluded with Hachette, Macmillan, HarperCollins, Penguin, and Simon & Schuster in order to undermine Amazon, which until the launch of Apple's iBookstore was able to sell e-books for a money-losing standard of $10, which many critics at the time noted was intended to make it impossible for smaller competitors to enter the market, and which publishers bitterly objected to.

Cote noted that the publishers' switch to an agency model, discussed by the publishers amongst themselves long before the iBookstore concept but made fruitful through Apple's willingness to adopt the model, forced a number of best-selling e-books to climb in price to $13 or $15. The finding was despite contradictory testimony from Google, Barnes & Noble, and even some Amazon executives that Apple had not introduced, facilitated or required that pricing structure.

Ironically, publisher Hachette's recently-struck agreement with Amazon -- which ended a string of bullying and punitive actions by the reseller, exactly as predicted by critics and previously demonstrated by Amazon - holds the megaseller to the very same "agency model" pricing agreement Apple ran afoul of the DOJ over. Conceivably, that settlement could aid Apple in its appeal.

The settlement now approved by the judge has an escape clause for Apple, however. Should Judge Cote's ruling in the Federal-level suit be overturned, Apple will owe nothing to the states. If the case is sent back to Cote on appeal for re-appraisal, the settlement would be reduced to just $50 million to consumers, and $20 million to lawyers. The judge initially objected to the clause, hinting that she thought it likely her ruling would be at least remanded for adjustment.

"The plaintiffs have shown that the publisher defendants conspired with each other to eliminate retail price competition in order to raise e-book prices, and that Apple played a central role in facilitating and executing that conspiracy," the judge commented in her controversial ruling, finding Apple guilty of the price fixing. The verdict has been widely decried by legal analysts, antitrust experts, and the press. "Without Apple's orchestration of this conspiracy, it would not have succeeded as it did in the spring of 2010," Cote claimed.

One of the aspects' of Apple's initial iBookstore agreements gave the company "most favored nation" status, ensuring that no title could be sold for less than it was at the iBookstore. Although such clauses are very common in retail agreements -- including Amazon's agreements with the publishers -- Judge Cote and the DOJ decided that Apple's use of the MFN clause was somehow anti-competitive. The prosecution and judge's rationale was that it put a stop to Amazon's predatory pricing, which was later revealed to cost the company around $3 per e-book sold on average -- or approximately the wholesale cost Apple and the publishers later promoted as a "sustainable" retail price.
( Last edited by NewsPoster; Nov 22, 2014 at 12:27 AM. )
     
prl99
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: pacific northwest
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 21, 2014, 06:09 PM
 
When will this corrupt judge go after Amazon for everything wrong they've been doing? Never? Sounds about right.
     
elroth
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 23, 2014, 06:31 PM
 
The judge has no say in what suits are filed. It's up to the Department of Justice to go after Amazon.
     
   
Thread Tools
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:42 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,