MacNN Forums (http://forums.macnn.com/)
-   Tech News (http://forums.macnn.com/tech-news/)
-   -   iPad mini reviews: New gold standard for smaller tablets (http://forums.macnn.com/113/tech-news/494215/ipad-mini-reviews-new-gold-standard/)

 
NewsPoster Oct 31, 2012 02:49 AM
iPad mini reviews: New gold standard for smaller tablets
Early <a href="http://macnn.com/rd/271898==http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/10/23/apple.says.its.internals.are.better.than.ipad.2/" rel='nofollow'>iPad mini</a> reviews are in with most overwhelmingly positive. The majority of reviewers agree with Apple's sentiment that the iPad mini is not a dilution of the larger iPad experience, and some even go as far as to say that it is the best tablet that Apple has yet made. Criticisms were relatively minor with the lack of a Retina-class high dpi display being the biggest drawback, while price was also mentioned as a negative though most feel that its build quality justifies the difference over the competition.<br><br>Walt Mossberg of the <em>Wall Street Journal</em> says that "...I've been testing the iPad mini for several days and found <a href="http://macnn.com/rd/271899== http://allthingsd.com/20121030/sizing-up-the-new-ipad-mini/" rel='nofollow'>it does exactly what it promises</a>: It brings the iPad experience to a smaller device." David Pogue of <em>The New York Times</em> commented along similar lines saying "Overall, the mini <a href="http://macnn.com/rd/271900== http://www.nytimes.com/2012/11/01/technology/personaltech/presenting-the-nook-hd-ipad-mini-and-windows-phone-8-review.html?ref=technology " rel='nofollow'>gives you all the iPad goodness</a> in a more manageable size, and it's awesome. You could argue that the iPad mini is what the iPad always wanted to be."

John Gruber, however, was quite taken back by the lower resolution of the iPad mini. "If the Mini had a Retina display, I'd switch from the iPad 3 in a heartbeat," Gruber said. "As it stands, I'm going to switch anyway. <a href="http://macnn.com/rd/271901== http://daringfireball.net/2012/10/ipad_mini" rel='nofollow'>Going non-Retina is a particularly bitter pill</a> for me, but I like the iPad mini's size and weight so much that I'm going to swallow it." Scott Stein of <em>CNET</em> adds, "If the iPad mini had a Retina display, a newer A6 processor, and a slightly lower price, it would be the must-have Apple gadget of the year. Even without that, it's still incredibly appealing."

Rich Jaroslovsky of <em>Bloomberg</em> captures the matter of the iPad mini's price well. "How much is Apple's superiority in software and content worth to you? How about $130?" Jaroslovsky proposes. "I can tell you the iPad mini is the best small tablet you can buy. The question you'll have to answer for yourself is whether it's that much better." MG Siegler of <em>TechCrunch</em> believes that the <a href="http://macnn.com/rd/271902== http://techcrunch.com/2012/10/30/ipad-mini-review/" rel='nofollow'>relatively high price of the iPad mini</a> will not stop it from succeeding. " ...But how will a $329 tablet fare in a world of $199 tablets? It's hard to know for sure, but my guess would be in the range of "quite well" to "spectacular."

Josh Topolsky of <em>The Verge</em> holds the view that "<a href="http://macnn.com/rd/271903== http://www.theverge.com/2012/10/30/3576178/apple-ipad-mini-review" rel='nofollow'> There's no tablet in this size range</a> that's as beautifully constructed, works as flawlessly, or has such an incredible software selection." Tim Stevens of <em>Engadget</em> was similary effusive in his praise for the iPad mini. "This isn't just a shrunken-down iPad," says Stevens. This is, in many ways, <a href="http://macnn.com/rd/271904== http://www.engadget.com/2012/10/30/apple-ipad-mini-review/" rel='nofollow'> Apple's best tablet yet</a>, an incredibly thin, remarkably light, obviously well-constructed device that offers phenomenal battery life."

Stay tuned for the <em>MacNN</em> take on the iPad mini over the coming days, as we take our customary deep delve into its pros and cons.

<div align="center"><img src="http://www.photos.macnn.com/news/1210/ipad-mini-lg.jpg" /></div>
 
Zanziboy Oct 31, 2012 03:08 AM
I imagine Apple made the right choice. Putting a Retina on the iPad Mini would have brought processor, battery, and weight issues to a device which needed to have a lower cost and a smaller profile. In addition, by keeping compatibility with existing software, there is no need for consumers to wait for modified apps to become available to take advantage of a new screen aspect ratio. In addition, the iPad Mini automatically inherits a greater screen DPI than the iPad 2 simply because the display is smaller. This means text will appear more crisp on the iPad Mini than on the iPad 2.
 
wrenchy Oct 31, 2012 11:46 AM
Quote, Originally Posted by Zanziboy (Post 4199251)
I imagine Apple made the right choice.
But, but, but Steve said you couldn't make a good tablet experience with anything smaller than 10 inches. "We really know this stuff"... The people will need sandpaper otherwise. But Steve said so.

Are you saying Steve was wrong? If Steve were here, there would be no iPad Mini-me. I miss Steve.
 
Spheric Harlot Oct 31, 2012 12:40 PM
Somebody whose Avatar is an Android pissing on an Apple misses Steve.

Cry me a river, crocodile boy.

FWIW, I'm not convinced of the size, either.
 
DiabloConQueso Oct 31, 2012 02:37 PM
Quote, Originally Posted by wrenchy (Post 4199352)
But, but, but Steve said you couldn't make a good tablet experience with anything smaller than 10 inches. "We really know this stuff"... The people will need sandpaper otherwise. But Steve said so.
Are you saying Steve was wrong? If Steve were here, there would be no iPad Mini-me. I miss Steve.
I believe Steve Jobs said you'd need sandpaper for 7" tablets, not "anything smaller than 10 inches."
 
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:20 PM.

Copyright © 2005-2007 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2