Google files countersuit against BT over patent infringement
Google has countersued UK telecommunications giant <a href="http://macnn.com/rd/279286==http://www.bt.com/" rel='nofollow'>British Telecom</a> over the use of our network-related patents. The countersuit is in retaliation over BT's <a href="http://macnn.com/rd/279271==http://www.electronista.com/articles/11/12/18/bt.says.android.and.more.violate.its.patents/" rel='nofollow'>original lawsuit</a>, which claimed Google infringed BT-owned patents in the development of Android, Google Maps, other related services, and also basic search functions. <br />
Four patents owned by Google are claimed to be infringed by BT and its subsidiaries, with the infringed patents covering quality-of-service products and conferencing services over its IP network. Google has listed BT Conferencing, BT Americas, BT INS, and Ipanema Technologies as the infringing parties, with a court in the Central District of California receiving a filing yesterday, and one in the UK receiving one today.
Google spokesperson Niki Fenwick said that the company has "always seen litigation as a last resort, and we work hard to avoid lawsuits," in an e-mail sent <a href="http://macnn.com/rd/279272==http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/02/13/us-google-bt-lawsuit-idUSBRE91C1J920130213" rel='nofollow' target="_self" title="">to</a> <em>Reuters</em>, continuing "but BT has brought several meritless patent claims against Google and our customers, and they've also been arming patent trolls." A BT spokesperson declined to comment on pending litigation.
The original BT lawsuit, which commenced in December 2011, was issued to a Delaware court, and covered a total of six patents for telecommunications and navigation. The claimed violations were deemed "willful" by BT, and so allowed for triple damages to be potentially awarded, though this was dropped <a href="http://macnn.com/rd/279273==http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/03/12/bt.tries.to.fast.track.android.lawsuit/" rel='nofollow' target="_self" title="">in March</a> in an attempt to accelerate the lawsuit.
<div align="center"><p style=" margin: 12px auto 6px auto; font-family: Helvetica,Arial,Sans-serif; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 14px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal; -x-system-font: none; display: block;"> <a title="View Bt Complaint on Scribd" href="http://www.scribd.com/doc/125386454/Bt-Complaint" style="text-decoration: underline;" >Bt Complaint</a> by <a title="View TechCrunch's profile on Scribd" href="http://www.scribd.com/TechCrunch" style="text-decoration: underline;" >TechCrunch</a> </p><iframe class="scribd_iframe_embed" src="http://www.scribd.com/embeds/125386454/content?start_page=1&view_mode=scroll&access_key=k ey-jrex1yqiz2qhs13axx7" data-auto-height="false" data-aspect-ratio="0.772727272727273" scrolling="no" id="doc_55641" width="500" height="666" frameborder="0"></iframe></div>
|All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:00 AM.||
Copyright © 2005-2007 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.