MacNN Forums (http://forums.macnn.com/)
-   Tech News (http://forums.macnn.com/tech-news/)
-   -   USPTO validates important aspects of Apple 'rubber-banding' patent (http://forums.macnn.com/113/tech-news/501434/uspto-validates-important-aspects-apple-rubber/)

 
NewsPoster Jun 13, 2013 05:43 PM
USPTO validates important aspects of Apple 'rubber-banding' patent
Apple has told US District Judge Lucy Koh that the US Patent and Trademark Office is issuing a reexamination certificate, confirming four primary claims in the company's so-called "rubber-banding" patent, according to <em>FOSS Patents</em>. The patent describes the way iOS reacts whenever a user hits the bottom of a scrollable element. The USPTO once tentatively rejected claims in the patent, but Apple urged a court overseeing one of the company's lawsuits against Samsung to wait. Claim 19 in the patent helped Apple <a href="http://macnn.com/rd/287698==http://www.electronista.com/articles/12/08/24/willful.infringement.finding.could.triple.damages/" rel='nofollow'>successfully sue Samsung for patent infringement last year</a>.<br />
<br />
It's <a href="http://macnn.com/rd/287697==http://www.fosspatents.com/2013/06/huge-win-for-apple-at-patent-office-key.html" rel='nofollow'>believed</a> that the certificate could give Apple an advantage when dealing with other patents it's asserting against Samsung. In the US, Apple is still dealing the aftermath of the 2012 lawsuit, an ongoing second, and a complaint at the International Trade Commission.
 
bobolicious Jun 13, 2013 06:24 PM
...perhaps macnn might be improved by having a separate legal news site, for all those interested in the behind the scenes 'news'...?

MacLegalista? MacLegalNN? MacCopyCatNN?
 
Charles Martin Jun 13, 2013 06:38 PM
It's true we have guaranteed another four years (at least) of material ... :)
 
coffeetime Jun 13, 2013 09:19 PM
How about MaCourtista?
 
Mike Wuerthele Jun 13, 2013 11:08 PM
That's an interesting question, though. Court cases. How much attention to regular site readers pay to the articles devoted to them? The whole case? Just the verdict?

There's actually a lot of material in between the start and finish we don't cover.
 
Sukoshi Jun 14, 2013 08:52 AM
If I make an extra hard drag on the muscles in my eyeballs I can skip right over a story I'm not interested in. This is *Mac*NN and until they change the first three letters I don't see why a story that's related to the company that makes Macs isn't worthy of the unlimited space available to this website. A lot of technical websites cover items that are connected to the companies they talk about by only a thin thread, yet it still interesting. What's funny is that you think somehow that this website is wasting your time, so you coming in and wasting a bunch of time to talk about how you don't want to read a story, when you could've just skipped it. Thank you for printing this article.
 
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:01 AM.

Copyright © 2005-2007 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.8
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.


Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.3.2