|
|
att
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Cali
Status:
Offline
|
|
http://www.wizzardsoftware.com/
AT&T Natural Voices head for Mac platform
Wizzard Software announced today that AT&T Natural Voices will soon be available for Mac. Named "Technology of the Year" by Frost & Sullivan, AT&T's Natural Voices product line is "widely considered to be one of the most human-sounding speech synthesis systems in the world." Wizzard says it will make this technology available to Apple application developers. Natural Voices has already "been licensed by Wizzard to a growing number of developers to be used in a variety of environments." Bruce Phifer said Natural Voices is currently "enjoying incredible popularity in the Windows and Linux environments." Wizzard did not specify when Natural Voices would become available to the public.
When do you think it will come out?
I have been waiting for something better than what comes with osx for months and months.
(
Last edited by yoyoman; Jun 2, 2005 at 12:43 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: France
Status:
Offline
|
|
Once bought IBM Via Voice and was quite disappointed. Although it sounds promising, it really has a long way to come, and specially foreign accents makes it hard to use. Probably native speakers have more chance not to repair all errors the program makes.
It seems they still haven't upgraded the program since the first port to OS X. That's a couple of years ! ago!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Status:
Offline
|
|
Uh, AT&T Natural Voices isn't a voice recognition software, it's text-to-speech software.
|
"That's Mama Luigi to you, Mario!" *wheeze*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: France
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Luca Rescigno
Uh, AT&T Natural Voices isn't a voice recognition software, it's text-to-speech software.
o, sorry, misunderstood then.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yeah, voice recognition has a lot farther to go than text-to-speech. Natural Voices are amazingly good, but I've never heard of a surprisingly usable voice recognition software. Even the professional stuff (like Via Voice) is pretty disappointing.
|
"That's Mama Luigi to you, Mario!" *wheeze*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Cali
Status:
Offline
|
|
So when will some one upgrade the ones that are stock on osx. Those are all the way back from os9
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: 888500128
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by yoyoman
So when will some one upgrade the ones that are stock on osx. Those are all the way back from os9
Correction: System 6
(only the "high-quality" ones are newer, dating, IIRC, to earlier versions of OS X.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Status:
Offline
|
|
It has been improving, but VERY slowly. I think originally it only came with the "Fred" voice. They added several more over time, later adding the "High Quality" versions, and finally they added a slightly better one (Vicki) in Panther. But it still sucks and it's very difficult to understand anything they say.
|
"That's Mama Luigi to you, Mario!" *wheeze*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Cali
Status:
Offline
|
|
4 + years and nothing. lol
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Admin Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by analogika
Correction: System 6
(only the "high-quality" ones are newer, dating, IIRC, to earlier versions of OS X.
Actually, the earliest voices date back to 1983, running on prerelease versions of System 1.
There were some high-quality voices introduced with the AV Quadras, too. They were later improved further.
tooki
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: :ИOITAↃO⅃
Status:
Offline
|
|
I've been using the Cepstral David voice for awhile now. It's much better than Apple's voices; I look forward to the AT&T voices!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by tooki
Actually, the earliest voices date back to 1983, running on prerelease versions of System 1.
There were some high-quality voices introduced with the AV Quadras, too. They were later improved further.
tooki
And to continue the story (since I find it interesting), the original MacInTalk was written for Apple by an outside developer, and Apple never got the source code back. Thus, the software was rewritten and rebranded MacInTalk Pro. The funny thing is, if you go back and listen to/watch the Mac's introduction, at which the Mac speaks about coming out of its box for the first time, you'll hear a Fred that is, IMO, superior to the one we ended up with. It sounded a bit more natural. Judge for yourself. . .
|
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Washington, DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yeah, there was some mention in the mac news in the last month or so about a company releasing new voices, Cepstral something, as stated above by Mithras.
Here is a link to Cepstral.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Admin Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Big Mac
And to continue the story (since I find it interesting), the original MacInTalk was written for Apple by an outside developer, and Apple never got the source code back. Thus, the software was rewritten and rebranded MacInTalk Pro. The funny thing is, if you go back and listen to/watch the Mac's introduction, at which the Mac speaks about coming out of its box for the first time, you'll hear a Fred that is, IMO, superior to the one we ended up with. It sounded a bit more natural. Judge for yourself. . .
Well, the demo was all sorts of hand-tweaked. I'm sure it wasn't just doing simple text-to-speech, but that the speech was hand-tuned.
tooki
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|