|
|
Best way to convert video for iPad
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Aug 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
I just purchased an iPad and have some DVD's that I'd like to convert to video for the iPad. These aren't copyprotected DVD's. In the past I've used Roxio's Toast and Popcorn to convert video for my ipod/iphone and AppleTV. Neither of these programs have a selected for iPad though.
I hope a future update to these programs have this feature. Until then though is there another program to convert this video? I hope to find a user friendly program. Both of the above work but also with some DVD's it can be confusing to find the proper files to convert. Thank you for your help.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Polwaristan
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Houston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
There's no iPad preset in HandBrake yet, but the iPad is pretty capable for H.264. For iPad (and maybe iPhone 3GS, but no other Apple device) encodes you can use the High Profile preset. Drop the AC3 passthrough track in the audio tab since it's a waste of space (iPhone OS can't play it).
For multi-device encodes, use the Apple Universal preset. Not as efficient as High Profile, but works on AppleTV, iPhone, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: PDX
Status:
Offline
|
|
I use the AppleTV preset and if I want to put any of my movies on my iPhone I convert down. Would rather have a nice high(er) quality rip for TV and iPad. iPad can handle 720p playback, so anything but BluRay conversions in 1080p will be fine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I like handbreak, but it is amazingly and painfully slow.
|
- MacBook Air M2 16GB / 512GB
- MacBook Pro 16" i9 2.4Ghz 32GB / 1TB
- MacBook Pro 15" i7 2.9Ghz 16GB / 512GB
- iMac i5 3.2Ghz 1TB
- G4 Cube 500Mhz / Shelf display unit / Museum display
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Polwaristan
Status:
Offline
|
|
Have you tried the 64-bit version?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by driven
I like handbreak, but it is amazingly and painfully slow.
The 64-bit version on my Core i7 MBP sure isn't.
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Simon
The 64-bit version on my Core i7 MBP sure isn't.
Yes. 2.66 Ghz Core i7, 8GB RAM ... 10.5 hours to encode a 1.5 hour movie.
64 bit, Windows 7, 64 bit version of Handbrake.
|
- MacBook Air M2 16GB / 512GB
- MacBook Pro 16" i9 2.4Ghz 32GB / 1TB
- MacBook Pro 15" i7 2.9Ghz 16GB / 512GB
- iMac i5 3.2Ghz 1TB
- G4 Cube 500Mhz / Shelf display unit / Museum display
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: in front of my Mac
Status:
Offline
|
|
You did see the --> <-- in my post, right?
Here's what I'm comparing to.
2.66 GHz Core i7 Arrandale, 4GB RAM, 5 minutes to encode a 25 min TV show.
64 bit, OS X 10.6.3, 64 bit version of Handbrake
I'd say it all depends on what type of source you have and which type of format you're converting to. I can imagine if you have very high resolution content and you convert to a high bit rate and high resolution, possibly dual-pass, you'll wait longer. I do find 10.5 hours quite excessive though. In my case its mostly converting from 720p or even 480p material to iPhone h264 (IOW quite similar to what the OP was intending to do). And that has become a lot faster thanks to Core i7 and the 64 bit version of Handbreak. I'd say my encode fps jumped by over 50%.
|
•
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Down by the river
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by driven
Yes. 2.66 Ghz Core i7, 8GB RAM ... 10.5 hours to encode a 1.5 hour movie.
64 bit, Windows 7, 64 bit version of Handbrake.
10.5 hours to convert a 1.5 hour movie is ludicrous on that machine. My 1G MacPro might do it real-time at worst (that's using a very high bitrate) and usually can rip at a high bitrate in less then 50 minutes. Something's wrong with your setup for it to take as long as it did.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot
Windows 7?
Yes. It was released after Vista.
|
- MacBook Air M2 16GB / 512GB
- MacBook Pro 16" i9 2.4Ghz 32GB / 1TB
- MacBook Pro 15" i7 2.9Ghz 16GB / 512GB
- iMac i5 3.2Ghz 1TB
- G4 Cube 500Mhz / Shelf display unit / Museum display
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Athens, Greece
Status:
Offline
|
|
what kind of frame-rates do you guys get?
I'm usually in the 70-100fps on my MacPro 2x2.66GHz (2006 model)
I could swear that in the previous version I could get 140fps.
But I can't swear also about it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by driven
Yes. It was released after Vista.
Oh.
I hadn't seen the Dell and was wondering whether there might be driver issues running Handbrake in W7 on an iMac.
Smartass.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot
Oh.
I hadn't seen the Dell and was wondering whether there might be driver issues running Handbrake in W7 on an iMac.
Smartass.
:-) (I really had no idea where you were going with that question.)
Of course I'd rather have my old MBP here, but failing that, this isn't a bad PC. (Esp since it's provided to me.)
|
- MacBook Air M2 16GB / 512GB
- MacBook Pro 16" i9 2.4Ghz 32GB / 1TB
- MacBook Pro 15" i7 2.9Ghz 16GB / 512GB
- iMac i5 3.2Ghz 1TB
- G4 Cube 500Mhz / Shelf display unit / Museum display
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: May 1999
Location: Chicago (where we vote early, and often)
Status:
Offline
|
|
You need to download the version called "Handbrake Nightly". It's continually being improved, and contains a preset for iPad. You can also use the iPad setting for movies to be played on an iPhone 4, with higher screen resolution. Download it here:
Dashboard [Hudson]
Download either the Mac32 or Mac64 versions. Works beautifully.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Tampa, Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
Air Video works nicely if you don't want to consume GBs in your iPad.
The Freeagent Dockstar one-ups the idea with being an extra feature in a NAS. $20 in Woot today only.
Perhaps Pogoplug offers the transcoding-streaming feature as well?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Isle of Manhattan
Status:
Offline
|
|
Chalk up another vote for Handbrake. Using a MacPro it takes about an hour to rip/compress a 90 min film for the iPhone at 750kbps (I sometimes use the tv adapter to view them).
|
"Faster, faster! 'Till the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death." - HST
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Indy.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Using the latest build of Handbrake (svn3402 x86_64 (2010062301), the "iPad" setting gives me about 2:45 to encode a 2:49 minute movie.
OS X 10.6.4, 3.06GHz Core 2 Duo, 4GB RAM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Tried to rip a movie this morning. Movie length was just under 2 hours. Handbrake wanted 18 hours to encode. I let it run for about 3 hours and it was 14% done. I cancelled.
I *must* be doing something wrong.
|
- MacBook Air M2 16GB / 512GB
- MacBook Pro 16" i9 2.4Ghz 32GB / 1TB
- MacBook Pro 15" i7 2.9Ghz 16GB / 512GB
- iMac i5 3.2Ghz 1TB
- G4 Cube 500Mhz / Shelf display unit / Museum display
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Just tried a 46-minute DVD. MacBook 2GHz took just over an hour to convert it to "Apple universal" quality.
10.5.8, latest version of Handbrake, latest VLC.
Do you have a recent version of VLC installed?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot
Just tried a 46-minute DVD. MacBook 2GHz took just over an hour to convert it to "Apple universal" quality.
10.5.8, latest version of Handbrake, latest VLC.
Do you have a recent version of VLC installed?
Yes. But I'm not sure if it's using it. Handbrake is a 64 bit program and VLC is a 32 bit program. I can't find a download for a 32 bit handbrake for Windows 7.
|
- MacBook Air M2 16GB / 512GB
- MacBook Pro 16" i9 2.4Ghz 32GB / 1TB
- MacBook Pro 15" i7 2.9Ghz 16GB / 512GB
- iMac i5 3.2Ghz 1TB
- G4 Cube 500Mhz / Shelf display unit / Museum display
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Nevermind. Handbrake *is* 32 bit.
So, still no idea what the issue is.
|
- MacBook Air M2 16GB / 512GB
- MacBook Pro 16" i9 2.4Ghz 32GB / 1TB
- MacBook Pro 15" i7 2.9Ghz 16GB / 512GB
- iMac i5 3.2Ghz 1TB
- G4 Cube 500Mhz / Shelf display unit / Museum display
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
I would just like to note here for posteriority (and Google) that
XiliSoft/Aiseesoft is a scam.
Xilisoft/Aiseesoft DOES NOT WORK.
They repeatedly and obnoxiously spam various forums, and while the product *sort of* works, it's €30 in the "basic" version, and the attempt to convert a DVD resulted in a separate video file for each .VOB, *wildly* shifted audio, and complete lack of audio for the final .VOB, and no way to claim a refund.
I know this because a client fell for the Xilisoft/Aiseesoft scam before giving me a call. Handbrake and VLC are free and now working fine for him.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Calgary
Status:
Offline
|
|
Just in case it's not completely clear through this thread:
Handbrake
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Palo Alto, CA USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
To use 64-bit Handbrake, you need the 64-bit version of VLC, and Leopard or Snow Leopard.
Using 32-bit, it took me about 2 hours to make an m4v file of a 2 hour movie in 480x302 (iPhone)
with 64-bit, it took about 30 mins to make the same file at same resolution.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I think I found my issue.
I managed to convert the DVD into a VIDEO_TS folder. When I ran Handbrake on that folder the entire process took 45 minutes for a 2 hour movie. I'm thinking my holdup is the optical drive.
|
- MacBook Air M2 16GB / 512GB
- MacBook Pro 16" i9 2.4Ghz 32GB / 1TB
- MacBook Pro 15" i7 2.9Ghz 16GB / 512GB
- iMac i5 3.2Ghz 1TB
- G4 Cube 500Mhz / Shelf display unit / Museum display
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Atlanta, GA, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I've been using a program called Air Video, and I love it. It does real time, on the fly streaming conversion for your iPad or iPhone. It will convert Quicktime, WMV, and Flash too. They have a free version, but I bought the one that was like $2. I've really been impressed by it.
|
Mac Pro 2x 2.66 GHz Dual core, Apple TV 160GB, two Windows XP PCs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Tampa, Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
I've used air Video with great results, but I am now preferring to use a pogoplug, once I made it work. You need to pre-transcode movies to the iPhone preset with web optimization, but it saves gobs of money in electricity.
Does anybody know the actual fps of an iphone or ipad screen? Many of my videos are at 23.97fps, but I doubt that is truly displayed on an iOS device.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by The Godfather
Many of my videos are at 23.97fps, but I doubt that is truly displayed on an iOS device.
Why?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Tampa, Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by subego
Why?
Because I've seen LCD refresh rates of 30, 60, 75 Hz, not 23.97.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by The Godfather
Because I've seen LCD refresh rates of 30, 60, 75 Hz, not 23.97.
As I understand it, those would be maximum refresh rates. Assuming your source frame rate is less than this, the display will change its pixels at the rate it's fed the change.
I could be wrong though.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
The LCD "refresh rate" AFAIK is complete hogwash most of the time, as LCD's pixels need constant voltage, and there's always a lag between changing voltage states.
The electronics can poll the bus and pass that state on to the pixel transistors as often as they like (="refresh rate"), but polling at 75 Hz doesn't do jack shit if the pixel needs 300 ms to fade from black to white.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Tampa, Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
If that's the case, I could re-encode at 3 FPS and I wouldn't notice the difference?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by The Godfather
If that's the case, I could re-encode at 3 FPS and I wouldn't notice the difference?
If that were the case, you couldn't get away with 3 FPS. Fading between black and white is the biggest extreme. Everything else is somewhere in between and thus faster. I pulled that 300 ms out of somebody's ass, for illustrative purposes. Actual values may vary.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot
I pulled that 300 ms out of somebody's ass, for illustrative purposes.
Oh, that was you. Please don’t do that again without prior warning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Tampa, Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
It seems that nobody agrees with me on the importance of finding the least FPS to use in an iPhone/iPad. I am pretty sure my 3G provider would really appreciate it I stop streaming sub-optimal video from my video server to my iPhone.
I know there would be an optimal FPS setting dictated by LCD limitations, but an even lower FPS dictated by sensory limitations. These FPS values would be different for action, drama, animation, etc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
Status:
Offline
|
|
The iPhone supports up to 30fps for video.
Why would you think it displays less then what it is capable of?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Tampa, Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
I don't think it does, I just didn't even know the ballpark of the iPhone LCD display capabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by The Godfather
It seems that nobody agrees with me on the importance of finding the least FPS to use in an iPhone/iPad. I am pretty sure my 3G provider would really appreciate it I stop streaming sub-optimal video from my video server to my iPhone.
I know there would be an optimal FPS setting dictated by LCD limitations, but an even lower FPS dictated by sensory limitations. These FPS values would be different for action, drama, animation, etc.
You don't really have much wiggle room here. Your new framerate needs to divide evenly into your old framerate or it's going to look jerky.*
Your first possibility then, is to halve your framerate. You'd notice this in most situations, the only exception being traditional animation which is usually filmed at half the framerate** so there's less work for the animators.
Your next possibility is to quarter the framerate. You'd notice this in all situations.
* 24 to 30fps and back again (or 24 and 29.97) involves a special trick which is only available to go back and forth between those speeds. Obviously, neither divides easily into the other.
** To be precise, it's filmed at the full framerate, but each frame is shot twice. Works out essentially the same as shooting at half the framerate.
(
Last edited by subego; Jul 26, 2010 at 11:28 AM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|