Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Is this the most ugly car you've ever seen? [Pix]

Is this the most ugly car you've ever seen? [Pix]
Thread Tools
Spook E
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Tasmania
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 27, 2006, 07:26 PM
 
Was talking to some English friends not so long ago, and they kept telling me about this car they had seen whilst in Australia.

They couldn't remember the name or brand of it, and their attempts to describe it were next to useless. They were adamant that this vehicle was everywhere and the most hideous thing they have ever seen (this coming from a country full of fiats and citreons!).

Well, we were walking down the road and they pointed one out, looking madly about I couldn't see what they were on about, until I spied a normal (but rather wanky) ute (Utility Vehicle). These new ones are for rich builder tossers who like driving around their work sites and for country bumpkins to use as town cars basically.

So how do you international mob rate these things? Do you have similar vehicles in your countries and would you shell out for one? Personally I wouldn't want one, not at $50,000 but their not the ugliest thing I've ever seen.

Heres the Ford Version:







And the Holden (GM) Version:

     
Dark Helmet
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: President Skroob's Office
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 27, 2006, 07:43 PM
 
Yup it sure is.

"She's gone from suck to blow!"
     
jasonsRX7
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 27, 2006, 07:44 PM
 
Pretty fugly. There's stuff just as bad on the roads here...

Here's an El Camino and the new El Camino wannabe (Chevy Sh!trod or something)

El Camino


Chevy Sh!trod
     
davidflas
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Boynton Beach, Florida, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 27, 2006, 07:48 PM
 
This one's worse: Pontiac Aztek

2.7Ghz 15" Mid 2012 MBP 16GB RAM 7.2k 750GB HD anti-glare display|64GB iPad4 ATT LTE|
     
mdc
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY²
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 27, 2006, 07:51 PM
 


I think the Fiat Multipla is a lot worse. Yours is ugly, but I think I vote the Multipla as the ugliest car I can think of. Not even its 'glamor' shot can make it look good.
     
- - e r i k - -
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 27, 2006, 07:58 PM
 
Real Australians drive utes

[ fb ] [ flickr ] [] [scl] [ last ] [ plaxo ]
     
hickey
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2005
Location: West LA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 27, 2006, 08:12 PM
 
     
jasonsRX7
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 27, 2006, 08:27 PM
 
Originally Posted by - - e r i k - -
Real Australians drive utes
Hey, my sister is going to grad school in Gold Coast.
     
SirCastor
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Salt Lake City, UT USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 27, 2006, 08:39 PM
 
I was going to 2nd on the Aztek, but that Fiat Multipla has taken it's place. Fortunately, I've never seen one of those.
2008 iMac 3.06 Ghz, 2GB Memory, GeForce 8800, 500GB HD, SuperDrive
8gb iPhone on Tmobile
     
Stogieman
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 27, 2006, 08:44 PM
 
I agree with SirCastor

1. Multipla
2. Aztec

Slick shoes?! Are you crazy?!
     
mindwaves
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Irvine, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 27, 2006, 08:54 PM
 
     
hickey
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2005
Location: West LA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 27, 2006, 09:01 PM
 
I was wondering how long it would take someone to post a pic of the Baja or the Brat.
     
villalobos
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 27, 2006, 09:06 PM
 
Originally Posted by davidflas
This one's worse: Pontiac Aztek


yeah by far.
     
villalobos
Mac Elite
Join Date: Apr 2000
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 27, 2006, 09:13 PM
 
Originally Posted by Stogieman
I agree with SirCastor

1. Multipla
2. Aztec
Nah I have seen both on the road, and the Aztex is wayyyyyy uglier.
     
powerbook867
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The midwest...
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 27, 2006, 09:19 PM
 
Aztek is the (unlucky) winner IMHO....
Joe
     
wdlove
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Boston, MA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 27, 2006, 09:20 PM
 
I've seen worse, the blue color helps a lot.

"Never give in, never give in, never, never, never, never - in nothing, great or small, large or petty - never give in except to convictions of honor and good sense." Winston Churchill
     
hickey
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2005
Location: West LA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 27, 2006, 09:26 PM
 
what the hell could be worse than whats already posted?
     
vmarks
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Up In The Air
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 27, 2006, 09:48 PM
 
The Ford looks as if they're using leftover last-gen Mustang hoods / bumpers / fenders.

So much for the flagship ponycar...
If this post is in the Lounge forum, it is likely to be my own opinion, and not representative of the position of MacNN.com.
     
mdc
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: NY²
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 27, 2006, 09:50 PM
 
Originally Posted by hickey
http://www.nerdherd.com/motorcycle/dcp/gm-crx1l.jpg
Look at the size of that that thing's exhaust.

I was talking to a friend of mine while I was driving home, from work, today. Why is it always people who drive a 10+ year old car, or something, with a huge exhaust, stickers all over the car, and wheels that have been spaced 4 inches outside of the car, the people going 50mph in the fast lane?
     
Y3a
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Northern VA - Just outside DC
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 27, 2006, 10:21 PM
 
Pacer. Yeeecchhh!
     
davesimondotcom
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Landlockinated
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 27, 2006, 10:44 PM
 
Asstek, by far the worst design to ever make it to the market.
[ sig removed - image host changed it to a big ad picture ]
     
Lateralus
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Arizona
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 27, 2006, 10:51 PM
 
I like chicken
I like liver
Meow Mix, Meow Mix
Please de-liv-er
     
hickey
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2005
Location: West LA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 27, 2006, 11:03 PM
 
i heard those scions actually sold fairly well, despite theire terrible looks.
     
MM-o4
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sydney
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 27, 2006, 11:28 PM
 
grad school????

do you mean high school or uni? By the name grad, I'm guessing you mean uni.

I'm in Sydney and they are everywhere. Definitely a wanky workmans car. Big V8s with big rims and sports suspension are sh!t on a muddy construction site.

Utes are a great Aussie tradition. Oi!

MM
     
ReggieX
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Toronto, ON
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 27, 2006, 11:28 PM
 
The Aztek is ugly, the El Camino wanna-bes are just retarded.
The Lord said 'Peter, I can see your house from here.'
     
euchomai
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 27, 2006, 11:35 PM
 
The xb isn't too bad. Kinda pimp in a cheap boxy way.
...
     
ambush
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: -
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 27, 2006, 11:58 PM
 
Originally Posted by Lateralus
this car rocks. tho I'm worried about the lack of aerodynamism.
     
cjrivera
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 28, 2006, 12:25 AM
 
Originally Posted by Spook E
The sedan versions of these (minus the pickup truck bed in the back) look pretty good....

http://www.fpv.com.au/index.asp?link_id=2

And even though the models with the truck beds don't look so great, looking at their engine specs and performance options, they sound like pretty awesome performance vehicles.

From the website (regarding the F6 Tornado version of this car)...

"The new F6 270 Turbo. A 4-litre turbo-charged, intercooled, 24-valve double overhead cam six. The highest torque output of any production six ever built in Australia and one of the most powerful in the world. Through partnership with Prodrive and their mastery of turbo technology across F1 and World Rally, the development of our high performance turbo-charged FPV will change performance cars forever. We created a new engine with dramatically improved cooling and induction. The 50% larger air-to-air intercooler and dual air intake system significantly reduces intake pressure into the turbo's compressor - allowing it to work more efficiently...and effectively.

The result. A fully engineered performance-driven power generator. Armed with double overhead camshafts and 4-valve aluminum cylinder heads, the F6 270 Turbo produces its maximum power of 270kW at 5250 rpm. However, the real story is torque. All 550Nm on tap from just 2000 rpm and remaining constant all the way through to 4250 rpm.

At time of launch, the highest torque output of any production engine ever built in Australia. Even more staggering is the engine's ability to produce 80% of its maximum torque at 1500 rpm and over 98% at 1750 rpm. Total Performance meets the turbo."

Can anyone translate this into numbers us non-metric folk can understand?
I didn't see any 0-60mph-type numbers on the site. Anyone know how fast these things go?
"It's weird the way 'finger puppets' sounds ok as a noun..."
     
hickey
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2005
Location: West LA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 28, 2006, 12:36 AM
 
the sedans kinda look like the newer GTO's
     
d4nth3m4n
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Far above Cayuga's waters.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 28, 2006, 12:43 AM
 
Originally Posted by hickey
the sedans kinda look like the newer GTO's
zeta platform. developed by holden. the holden monaro is our GTO. could just be what saves the chevy SS line. the cobalt and trailblazer sure aren't going to get it done.

http://www.motortrend.com/future/spi...les/index.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GM_Zeta_platform
     
Dark Helmet
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: President Skroob's Office
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 28, 2006, 12:45 AM
 
Originally Posted by Lateralus
I have to agree, that is the ugliest thing on the road today.

"She's gone from suck to blow!"
     
hickey
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2005
Location: West LA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 28, 2006, 12:45 AM
 
oh cool stuff.
     
cjrivera
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 28, 2006, 12:48 AM
 
Originally Posted by hickey
the sedans kinda look like the newer GTO's
I maybe wrong, but I thought the GTOs are from GM Australia? Maybe it's an Australian styling theme...

(nevermind: just saw d4nth3m4n's post up there...)
"It's weird the way 'finger puppets' sounds ok as a noun..."
     
Macfreak7
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Macfreak7
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 28, 2006, 12:56 AM
 
Let's not forget this monstrosity.
     
MM-o4
Senior User
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Sydney
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 28, 2006, 01:40 AM
 
yeah GTO's are Monora's in Australia. Beasts! and made in Australia. They're sold in UK also.

see more

http://www.holden.com.au/www-holden/...?modelid=12001

MM
     
d4nth3m4n
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Far above Cayuga's waters.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 28, 2006, 01:43 AM
 
they're also branded as vauxhalls.
     
Stogieman
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Santa Rosa, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 28, 2006, 04:26 AM
 
Originally Posted by Dark Helmet
I have to agree, that is the ugliest thing on the road today.
I agree that the Scion XB is one ugly vehicle. But uglier than an Aztec? I don't think so.

Slick shoes?! Are you crazy?!
     
aberdeenwriter
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Aberdeen, WA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 28, 2006, 07:05 AM
 


A 1983 Plymouth Scamp also marketed as the Dodge Rampage.



A 1983 or 1984 Chevy El Camino (from the Costner/Houston film, "The Bodyguard")

And I LIKE the looks and utility of both!

EDIT: Here's a great looking 69 El Camino!

( Last edited by aberdeenwriter; Feb 28, 2006 at 07:21 AM. )
Consider these posts as my way of introducing you to yourself.

Proud "SMACKDOWN!!" and "Golden Troll" Award Winner.
     
macaddict0001
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Edmonton, AB
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 28, 2006, 07:05 AM
 
Originally Posted by cjrivera
The sedan versions of these (minus the pickup truck bed in the back) look pretty good....

http://www.fpv.com.au/index.asp?link_id=2

And even though the models with the truck beds don't look so great, looking at their engine specs and performance options, they sound like pretty awesome performance vehicles.

From the website (regarding the F6 Tornado version of this car)...

"The new F6 270 Turbo. A 4-litre turbo-charged, intercooled, 24-valve double overhead cam six. The highest torque output of any production six ever built in Australia and one of the most powerful in the world. Through partnership with Prodrive and their mastery of turbo technology across F1 and World Rally, the development of our high performance turbo-charged FPV will change performance cars forever. We created a new engine with dramatically improved cooling and induction. The 50% larger air-to-air intercooler and dual air intake system significantly reduces intake pressure into the turbo's compressor - allowing it to work more efficiently...and effectively.

The result. A fully engineered performance-driven power generator. Armed with double overhead camshafts and 4-valve aluminum cylinder heads, the F6 270 Turbo produces its maximum power of 270kW at 5250 rpm. However, the real story is torque. All 550Nm on tap from just 2000 rpm and remaining constant all the way through to 4250 rpm.

At time of launch, the highest torque output of any production engine ever built in Australia. Even more staggering is the engine's ability to produce 80% of its maximum torque at 1500 rpm and over 98% at 1750 rpm. Total Performance meets the turbo."

Can anyone translate this into numbers us non-metric folk can understand?
I didn't see any 0-60mph-type numbers on the site. Anyone know how fast these things go?
Basically you can spin the tires sans clutch.
     
aberdeenwriter
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Aberdeen, WA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 28, 2006, 07:08 AM
 
Originally Posted by macaddict0001
Basically you can spin the tires sans clutch.
Apparently, no turbo-lag. Is that right?
Consider these posts as my way of introducing you to yourself.

Proud "SMACKDOWN!!" and "Golden Troll" Award Winner.
     
ajprice
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 28, 2006, 07:10 AM
 

SsangYong Rodius

It'll be much easier if you just comply.
     
Goldfinger
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Belgium
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 28, 2006, 07:45 AM
 
Ugh, I saw one of those Rodius' the first time a week or two ago. Let me tell you this: it looks good on in the picture. It's nothing compared to it's uglyness on the road.

I honestly can't grasp what those people are thinking when they actually authorize the production of such a design.

iMac 20" C2D 2.16 | Acer Aspire One | Flickr
     
Maflynn
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Boston
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 28, 2006, 08:15 AM
 
Originally Posted by Lateralus

I have to say toyota was trying to sell these cars to the younger generation but so far all the people I see driving these babies are old guys in hats. Not quite the image toyota was going for

Oh and it fugly
     
Randman
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MacNN database error. Please refresh your browser.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 28, 2006, 08:32 AM
 

This is a computer-generated message and needs no signature.
     
ajprice
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 28, 2006, 08:35 AM
 
Originally Posted by Maflynn
I have to say toyota was trying to sell these cars to the younger generation but so far all the people I see driving these babies are old guys in hats. Not quite the image toyota was going for

Oh and it fugly
Yo yo yo ma grandma homies! Dem Xb's iz nuffin wivout mad paint and sounds man!!

It'll be much easier if you just comply.
     
hickey
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2005
Location: West LA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 28, 2006, 10:26 AM
 
i still cannot fathom why someone would all that **** to a car.
     
Dakar
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Pretentiously Retired.
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 28, 2006, 10:37 AM
 
The Metro...Convertible!



Or the Mercury Crapi
     
Jasoco
Mac Elite
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Home in front of my computer
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 28, 2006, 11:02 AM
 
Originally Posted by Lateralus
I still think this is the winner. UGLY as HELL.
     
macaddict0001
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Edmonton, AB
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 28, 2006, 04:16 PM
 
Originally Posted by aberdeenwriter
Apparently, no turbo-lag. Is that right?
Just about, torque is what makes the tires spin, and typically maximum torque is achieved at very high rpm's especially if you have a turbo(because turbos use exhaust pressure to increase the air pressure going in to the engine) but this engine has 98% of maximum torque at 1750 rpm, for comparison most engines idle at around 800 rpm so at twice as many rpms as idle you can get the most torque your ever going to get.
Of course you could do this with most engines by adding a programmable ecu and adjusting the engine timing to give you torque at low rpms.
     
ghporter
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 28, 2006, 09:21 PM
 
It sure ain't pretty, but any low dollar "customized" Honda (typically without paint on all the "cool" body parts, and often sporting "racing instruments" the driver may not be able to see past) is the YUGLIEST of the ugly. At least that Ford looks finished.

Scion's little boxes are indeed pretty ugly, but they are only working on a refinement of what Fiat did in the 1970s. And if you think that's ugly, look for a Lada sedan. They are (were) made in Russia for export and looked like a bad knockoff of those boxy Fiats. Worse yet, find it in a Central American country decked out as a taxi! Yes, that's what I said. Some of my worst memories of Panama (1987-1989) involve trips from one side of the Canal to the other and back in such "taxis." I shudder even now...

I still think that odd pseudo-pickup that Chevy makes, the SSR, is just an example of a vehicle the real pickups point at and make fun of. The only thing worse in their lineup is the HHR, which looks like a PT Cruiser but better-though it's about four years too late.

Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
     
 
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:58 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,