Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Where do you think A-Rod's gonna end up?

View Poll Results: Where's A-Rod gonna end up?
Poll Options:
LA Angels 2 votes (10.53%)
LA Dodgers 4 votes (21.05%)
NY Mets (please, God, no!) 2 votes (10.53%)
NY Yankees 2 votes (10.53%)
Boston Red Sox 4 votes (21.05%)
Baltimore Orioles 0 votes (0%)
Texas Rangers 0 votes (0%)
Florida Marlins 0 votes (0%)
Chicago Cubs 2 votes (10.53%)
Kansas City Royals 0 votes (0%)
Toronto Blue Jays 0 votes (0%)
Some Other Team 3 votes (15.79%)
Voters: 19. You may not vote on this poll
Where do you think A-Rod's gonna end up?
Thread Tools
Dork.
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 7, 2007, 09:35 PM
 
Someone's gonna pony up the big bucks for him. Let's see if we can predict it now!
     
Rumor
Moderator
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: on the verge of insanity
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 7, 2007, 10:11 PM
 
I think I busted one of the in an old 350 once.
I like my water with hops, malt, hops, yeast, and hops.
     
loveanh
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Nov 2006
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 8, 2007, 12:38 AM
 
Please not my beloved Red Sox, I take Mike Lowell over him any day.
     
Shaddim
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: 46 & 2
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 8, 2007, 01:08 AM
 
BoSox
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
- Thomas Paine
     
MacosNerd
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2007
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 8, 2007, 08:14 AM
 
I'm voting for the Mets, not that I think he should go, but rather they've been spending a boat load of money these past few years on trying to build a champion caliber team. They thought that had it last year until the historic collapse.

I don't think he's red sox material, especially since like a girly man he tried swatting the ball out in the 04 playoffs. I also think that Mike Lowell is a superior player because of his offense, defense and club house presence. He brings a lot to the table and I really hope the sox sign him.

Yankees are still a viable player though mini-me steinbrenner shooting his mouth off, makes it less and less likely.

Other then that all bets are off.
     
Dork.  (op)
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 8, 2007, 08:48 AM
 
The Mets have the money to sign A-Rod, but little else about the deal makes sense:

The Mets already have a pretty good Third Baseman, and their shortstop ain't so bad, either. The only place A-Rod could really play is first, and they'd have to move Delgado (and his big contract) to do that.

Also, although the Mets have been spending money, their payroll isn't nearly as high as the Red Sox or Yankees, and they do have a budget. Think of how much pitching $30M/yr can buy!

Finally, I think the Mets have identified one of their problems last year as a lack of chemistry. When A-Rod last flirted with the Mets, Steve Phillips (The Mets GM at the time) famously described him as a "24-and-1" player -- someone who won't play as a team with the other guys on the squad. I don't think that's changed at all.

I think either LA team or Chicago is the best fit for A-Rod, and now that Torre's with the Dodgers that may sway his thinking....
     
MacosNerd
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2007
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 8, 2007, 09:28 AM
 
Originally Posted by Dork. View Post
Also, although the Mets have been spending money, their payroll isn't nearly as high as the Red Sox or Yankees, and they do have a budget. Think of how much pitching $30M/yr can buy!

Finally, I think the Mets have identified one of their problems last year as a lack of chemistry.
You're right on both counts. While the mets have shown a desire to step up to the plate and spend what it takes, they're certainly not spending the amounts that both the yankees and sox have spent.

As for chemistry, that's a huge deal, just look at the yankees when they won the world series back in the 90s and when they haven't these last few years.

The difference was back then, they didn't have any all stars at least in the normal sense but they had great chemistry. Then as they retired/traded/went to free agency, the front office shopped around for super stars even if those folks were an awful presence in the club house. Sheffield comes quickly to mind. An incredibly talented ballplayer to be sure but an awful teammate.
     
KeriVit
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: In the South
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 8, 2007, 07:14 PM
 
I don't want him
     
Scarpa
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Aug 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 8, 2007, 07:53 PM
 
Originally Posted by MacosNerd View Post
I also think that Mike Lowell is a superior player because of his offense, defense and club house presence.
LOL

I understand Red Sox fans don't like the guy, but that's going a bit too far.

FWIW I think he ends up on the West coast, somewhere in LA, specifically. And I also don't think he'll get more money than the Yankees were offering him.

As far as the chemistry agrument goes, that's a bunch of BS. You don't need to look any further past the pitching to see why the Yankees haven't had success recently. You think GMs really consider team chemistry when signing players? That they'll spend millions of dollars based on some psychobabble?

FWIW I'm an A's fan - I re read my post and I realized I was defending the Yankees. I never thought I'd see that!
( Last edited by Scarpa; Nov 8, 2007 at 07:57 PM. Reason: afraid I'd look like a Yankees fan. ;))
     
Ghoser777
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Chicago, Illinois
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 8, 2007, 08:32 PM
 
Cubs.
     
TheMosco
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: MA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 8, 2007, 11:35 PM
 
I don't see him going to Sox if we sign Lowell. I am not sure where we would put him unless we got rid of Lugo which would be expensive and pricey. Better chance if we don't sign Lowell, but not much better.
AXP
ΔΣΦ
     
Dork.  (op)
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 9, 2007, 08:39 AM
 
I can't see A-Rod going to Boston after the stunt Boras pulled during Game 4 of the World Series. It's almost as if he did that on purpose to antagonize them.

And the problem with Chicago is that the Cubs need a new owner before they can buy A-Rod. (If Mark Cuban buys the Cubs, then A-Rod's chances of going there go up, IMHO.)
     
Dork.  (op)
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Nov 10, 2007, 02:42 PM
 
oops, can't believe i left SF off the list. They've proven they'll spend for Boras's guys....
     
Dork.  (op)
Professional Poster
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Rochester, NY
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 13, 2007, 08:50 PM
 
And the winners are 64stang06 and KeriVit, who apparently didn't think that a piddly 20 million dollars (which is more or less what the Yankees lost when A-Rod opted out) would keep the Yankees and A-Rod apart for long. Yeah, they started talking a few weeks ago, but he finally signed today.

It was very entertaining to watch the Soap Opera unfold!

And does anyone else think it's not a coincidence that after announcing the opt-out in the most public way possible, this contract was finally announced on Mitchell Day, when it would be relegated to second billing amidst all the graphic stories of Roger Clemens taking steroid shots in the ass?
     
64stang06
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2007
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 14, 2007, 12:20 AM
 
Hehe, well if the Yankees can pay a contract to Clemens this past season that was absurd, I'm not surprised they would be willing to pay for Rodriguez again.
     
rickey939
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Cooperstown '09
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 14, 2007, 01:20 AM
 
Royals.
     
imitchellg5
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Colorado
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Dec 15, 2007, 12:27 AM
 
He should have stayed with the Mariners, the jerk.
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:51 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,