Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Software - Troubleshooting and Discussion > Applications > Safari 1.3 (in Panther 10.3.9) is FAAAAST. Benches inside. (JPG)

Safari 1.3 (in Panther 10.3.9) is FAAAAST. Benches inside. (JPG) (Page 2)
Thread Tools
nforcer
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 17, 2005, 03:08 AM
 
Originally Posted by Eug Wanker
The selection in Safari 1.3 is way better than 1.2.
Can you show an instance where it is better? Just about everything I have tried shows it is worse.
Genius. You know who.
     
cSurfr
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 17, 2005, 04:23 AM
 
8.67 secs here for the test. Not bad at all.
     
Eug Wanker  (op)
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 17, 2005, 09:04 AM
 
Originally Posted by nforcer
Can you show an instance where it is better? Just about everything I have tried shows it is worse.
When I used to select text in Safari, I'd often miss a letter or two at one end of the selected text. This no longer happens. With Safari 1.3, the text I try to select is the text I get. It's a huge improvement.
     
Weyland-Yutani
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: LV-426
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 17, 2005, 09:59 AM
 
After moving English to the top in International, Safari 1.3 works

It is faster. A lot faster!

“Building Better Worlds”
     
siMac
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 17, 2005, 10:34 AM
 
Originally Posted by Eug Wanker
Text in maps.google.com is now all screwy.


Note the small grey word...

|\|0\/\/ 15 7|-|3 71|\/|3
     
Millennium
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 17, 2005, 11:50 AM
 
Originally Posted by CaptainHaddock
I just read the update at Dave Hyatt's website, and was impressed to learn that inline rich text editing is now part of Safari. CMS developers are going to love this!
I was glad to hear it, and particularly that they're supporting the de-facto standard designMode as well as the less-compatible but more-hyped contentEditable.

However, don't get your hopes up just yet. I've been looking at in-browser rich-text editors, and so far quite a few of them break completely under Safari 1.3. These will need to be updated to detect WebKit versions 312 or above and apply designMode to these, but not to older versions.
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
     
Eug Wanker  (op)
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 17, 2005, 12:20 PM
 
If anyone decides to do the BenchJS testing on their 10.3.8/Safari 1.2 machine, please check the results of Test 7 from 2038 on. According to the results in 10.3.9/Safari 1.3, every Xmas after 2037 occurs on a Friday.

I can't test 10.3.8 cuz all my machines have already been upgraded to 10.3.9.

P.S. How do in-browser RTF editors work?
     
fisherKing
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: brooklyn ny
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 17, 2005, 01:15 PM
 
speed is nice! (altho means i have to learn to type faster... )

everytime i open "show all bookmarks" safari crashes
(this happened BEFORE i installed pithhelmet)


any ideas??
"At first, there was Nothing. Then Nothing inverted itself and became Something.
And that is what you all are: inverted Nothings...with potential" (Sun Ra)
     
Macrat
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Houston, TX
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 17, 2005, 02:43 PM
 
Indeed it much speedier, here are my results on a Tibook 667:

Safari 1.2.4: 120 sec.
Safari 1.3: 16 sec.
Firefox: 45 sec.
G4 optimized Firefox: 28 sec.
Internet Exploder: 82 sec.
     
AKcrab
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 17, 2005, 04:21 PM
 
Safari is faster on that java test.
BUT
I've not found it any faster than using an optimized firefox build for "regular old" surfing. In fact, safari "feels" slower to me.
$0.02
     
TETENAL
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FFM
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 17, 2005, 07:12 PM
 
Originally Posted by AKcrab
Safari is faster on that java test.
That test is a JavaScript test.
     
Eug Wanker  (op)
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 17, 2005, 08:25 PM
 
Hmmm... For some reason Safari crashes now with I try to drag a bookmark out of the bookmark bar. This feature was working fine in Safari 1.3 yesterday, and in Safari 1.2 the day before.
     
Russian Mac fan
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Detroit, MI
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 18, 2005, 12:42 AM
 
Originally Posted by fisherKing
speed is nice! (altho means i have to learn to type faster... )

everytime i open "show all bookmarks" safari crashes
(this happened BEFORE i installed pithhelmet)


any ideas??
I have the same problem
     
Russian Mac fan
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Detroit, MI
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 18, 2005, 12:44 AM
 
Originally Posted by Eug Wanker
Hmmm... For some reason Safari crashes now with I try to drag a bookmark out of the bookmark bar. This feature was working fine in Safari 1.3 yesterday, and in Safari 1.2 the day before.

Same here
     
Big Mac
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 18, 2005, 01:16 AM
 
Originally Posted by Eug Wanker
Hmmm... For some reason Safari crashes now with I try to drag a bookmark out of the bookmark bar. This feature was working fine in Safari 1.3 yesterday, and in Safari 1.2 the day before.
No problem here. So you can't drag the default bookmarks out?

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
AKcrab
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 18, 2005, 01:37 AM
 
Originally Posted by TETENAL
That test is a JavaScript test.
OMG! My whole comment is null and void!
     
Appleman
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: France
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 18, 2005, 04:21 AM
 
Don't wanna be rude, and YES, I really love the speedbump Safari has gotten, but the new Firefox 1.0.3 is still a bit faster, at least it looks like it. Haven't tried with a stopwatch, maybe I should run a benchmark, but I never really believed in it, since they can be tweaked as any other software I think?
     
RevEvs
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Sitting in front of computer
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 18, 2005, 06:05 AM
 
Ive found that Camino/Firefox/Safari are now so near in speed that I simply choose which one I want to use by my preference to that particular app, and not the redering speed any more. I did a stopwatch test (after emptying all caches) on firefox/camino/safari on how fast they could open my tab group of 8 or so websites/fora, each one was pretty much the exact same, within a second oir two - and thats probably just me being slow on the stopwatch.

anyway - the faster the better
I free'd my mind... now it won't come back.
     
mac15
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sydney, Australia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 18, 2005, 06:57 AM
 
Originally Posted by Appleman
Don't wanna be rude, and YES, I really love the speedbump Safari has gotten, but the new Firefox 1.0.3 is still a bit faster, at least it looks like it. Haven't tried with a stopwatch, maybe I should run a benchmark, but I never really believed in it, since they can be tweaked as any other software I think?

Its more a visual defect with Safari - the progress bar in the location bar makes Safari feels slow, Even though it benches incredibly.
     
Millennium
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 18, 2005, 07:15 AM
 
Originally Posted by Millennium
I was glad to hear it, and particularly that they're supporting the de-facto standard designMode as well as the less-compatible but more-hyped contentEditable.

However, don't get your hopes up just yet. I've been looking at in-browser rich-text editors, and so far quite a few of them break completely under Safari 1.3. These will need to be updated to detect WebKit versions 312 or above and apply designMode to these, but not to older versions.
As an update to my previous post: it looks like this is not just a browser-sniffing issue. Something is, in fact, seriously wrong with designMode support in Safari 1.3.
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
     
OwlBoy
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Madison, WI
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 18, 2005, 07:15 AM
 


Thats in 2.0.

-Owl
     
Eug Wanker  (op)
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 18, 2005, 12:31 PM
 
21.51 seconds on Firefox 1.0 on Windows 2000, with a P4 1.6.

However, it seems that Test 7 is working correctly on Firefox, unlike both Safari 1.2 and Safari 1.3.
     
jay3ld
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 18, 2005, 05:46 PM
 
does anyone remeber that name of the probram that will moddify the google search so you can do like google images and search this site right from it? i forgot it and i think i threw it away with my old safari
     
elementality
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: HMB, Ca
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 18, 2005, 06:24 PM
 
Safari crashes for me everytime on startup. I had SafariStand and Saft installed, which I assume has caused the problem. However, I've deleted both of those applications, deleted all preference files, and reinstalled using the Combo Updater several times and I still can't even get Safari to boot.
     
Russian Mac fan
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Detroit, MI
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 18, 2005, 06:34 PM
 
Originally Posted by jay3ld
does anyone remeber that name of the probram that will moddify the google search so you can do like google images and search this site right from it? i forgot it and i think i threw it away with my old safari

Butler's search engines http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/12170
     
Mike Pither
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 18, 2005, 06:50 PM
 
I can't get the page below to load the embded pdf in safari, it works in all other browsers (omniweb / camino / firefox etc). Is the something special that I need to do?

http://www.lastampa.it/_WEB/_SERVIZI...ammiTV/pdf.asp
iMac DVSE 400 640mb + AL PB 15" with 1 gig + iMac 2,8 with 4gb + MacBook Pro 2,53 with 4gb
     
jay3ld
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 18, 2005, 10:10 PM
 
Originally Posted by elementality
Safari crashes for me everytime on startup. I had SafariStand and Saft installed, which I assume has caused the problem. However, I've deleted both of those applications, deleted all preference files, and reinstalled using the Combo Updater several times and I still can't even get Safari to boot.

heres what i did
when it crashed the window poped up saying it crashed.
I clicked send report.
i went though the bottom part and found out SIMBL was causing it.

so i would do that and find out what external thing is crashing your safari.
     
Gankdawg
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Pacific Northwest
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 18, 2005, 10:55 PM
 
Safari now shows your download speed and time remaining (in the Downloads window). No need to option-click to get that info anymore!
     
Eug Wanker  (op)
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 18, 2005, 11:05 PM
 
Originally Posted by Eug Wanker
21.51 seconds on Firefox 1.0 on Windows 2000, with a P4 1.6.

However, it seems that Test 7 is working correctly on Firefox, unlike both Safari 1.2 and Safari 1.3.
I just tried IE 5.2 on OS X as well. It completes Test 7 correctly too (although the overall bench is slow, at 64.9 seconds on a TiBook 1 GHz).

This Xmas day calculation bug seems to be unique to Safari, including 1.2, 1.3, and apparently 2.0 as well.

P.S. Here's a great way to crash Safari... I found this in the comments in Dave Hyatt's blog.

Go to Wild360.com and click on "(More...)". Safari crashes every time.
( Last edited by Eug Wanker; Apr 18, 2005 at 11:42 PM. )
     
Sarc
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chile
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 19, 2005, 01:44 AM
 
someone bench it against opera 8 please.
:: frankenstein / lcd-less TiBook / 1GHz / radeon 9000 64MB / 1GB RAM / w/ext. 250GB fw drive / noname usb bluetooth dongle / d-link usb 2.0 pcmcia card / X.5.8
:: unibody macbook pro / 2.4 Ghz C2D / 6GB RAM / dell 2407wfp - X.6.3
     
Big Mac
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 19, 2005, 02:24 AM
 
Is the Copy Image (to clipboard) contextual menu command broken for anyone else? For me it is only copying the URL. Oh well, can't have everything. . .

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
Eug Wanker  (op)
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 19, 2005, 10:29 AM
 
Google emailed me back about my bug report for maps.google.com. They say it's now fixed for Safari 1.3. (I can't check since I don't have a Mac with me.)
     
Thinine
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 19, 2005, 11:07 AM
 
They sent me an email too, since I reported the same issue. It is fixed now, and works better than before (when it worked).
     
JLL
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 19, 2005, 12:02 PM
 
Originally Posted by Sarc
someone bench it against opera 8 please.
Look for the name lunddal:





I also tested Safari and it's on a DP2.5GHz PM.
JLL

- My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right.
     
IronPen
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Midwest, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 19, 2005, 12:05 PM
 
SafariStand (http://macupdate.com/info.php/id/16687) - disable favicons, disable animated GIFs, add image resizing, enable address bar searching of Google, MacUpdate, Amazon, and more...very useful and free. Then download the ad-blocking CSS from the Web (http://www.floppymoose.com/) or use Camino's and dump Pith Helmet. I'm not trying to put PH down, it's just that you get these other replacements for free and they don't slow Safari to a crawl.
MacBook C2D 2.0GHz/Combo/2GB RAM
     
Sarc
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chile
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 19, 2005, 02:21 PM
 
Originally Posted by JLL
Look for the name lunddal:

I also tested Safari and it's on a DP2.5GHz PM.

thx for the benches.
:: frankenstein / lcd-less TiBook / 1GHz / radeon 9000 64MB / 1GB RAM / w/ext. 250GB fw drive / noname usb bluetooth dongle / d-link usb 2.0 pcmcia card / X.5.8
:: unibody macbook pro / 2.4 Ghz C2D / 6GB RAM / dell 2407wfp - X.6.3
     
Meteo
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 20, 2005, 05:58 AM
 
Originally Posted by Mike Pither
I can't get the page below to load the embded pdf in safari, it works in all other browsers (omniweb / camino / firefox etc). Is the something special that I need to do?

http://www.lastampa.it/_WEB/_SERVIZI...ammiTV/pdf.asp

try pdfplugin form Manfred Schubert
great product even on my imac 400
http://www.schubert-it.com
"It's not a bug, it's a feature..."
I do love these guys....
     
WJMoore
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 20, 2005, 06:21 AM
 
Originally Posted by nforcer
It still has a debug menu, which means it still has debug code, which means it is not as snappy as it could be
Whilst I'm aware you're joking your comment raises an interesting point. I think it could be a good idea for there to be a (visible) preference to enable an "Advanced" menu or "Web Developer" menu since some of the functions are particularly useful for more than just debugging purposes.
     
Mike Pither
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 20, 2005, 04:17 PM
 
Originally Posted by Meteo
try pdfplugin form Manfred Schubert
great product even on my imac 400
http://www.schubert-it.com
I am already using it and it works fine in Omniweb and Firefox but nothing loads in Safari. I don't know weather Safari tries to use the Acrobat plugin or the Schubert one, it's difficult to know as it isn' t loading anything. It simply says "This operation is not allowed"
iMac DVSE 400 640mb + AL PB 15" with 1 gig + iMac 2,8 with 4gb + MacBook Pro 2,53 with 4gb
     
Mike Pither
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Italy
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 20, 2005, 04:28 PM
 
Found the solution now, I removed the acrobat plugin, in Safari it created a conflict leaving me without a working plugin. Don't know why it caused a problem only in Safari but...........
iMac DVSE 400 640mb + AL PB 15" with 1 gig + iMac 2,8 with 4gb + MacBook Pro 2,53 with 4gb
     
monkeybrain
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 20, 2005, 04:39 PM
 
Originally Posted by jay3ld
does anyone remeber that name of the probram that will moddify the google search so you can do like google images and search this site right from it? i forgot it and i think i threw it away with my old safari
I think you mean acid search: http://www.pozytron.com/acidsearch

On another note, does anyone find Safari using loads of ram? It seems to use over 100 MB after a few minutes use. Did it always do this? I'm trying it our after using Camino for ages, I thought that was a ram-hog, by using about 70 MB.
     
Appleman
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: France
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2005, 04:07 AM
 
Originally Posted by Mike Pither
Found the solution now, I removed the acrobat plugin, in Safari it created a conflict leaving me without a working plugin. Don't know why it caused a problem only in Safari but...........
Safari did this before the update when you had Acrobat installed,
as it had a conflict with Preview I guess. There was no way to tell Safari to use Acrobat instead of Preview, or the other way around. Deleting Acrobat was the best thing to do. Preview is faster anyway. But I can understand that some people want or need Acrobat for whatever reason, I don't. To me it sucks.
     
Noonster
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: England, UK
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2005, 04:17 AM
 
I must admit over the last few months i have been using firefox as it has been much faster than safari... however after seeing these results i am impressed.

Now its the fastest browser on planet earth

Move over firefox - bring my safari back when i get tiger
MacBook • 13.3" MacBook Aluminum Unibody, 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo, 2GB, 250GB
iMac G5 • 20" iMac G5, 1.8GHz, 1GB, 160GB, SD, AP, BT/KB/MS
iPod Mini • Silver, 4GB
iPhone 3G • Black, 16GB
     
Eug Wanker  (op)
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2005, 06:13 AM
 
Posted elsewhere, about the every-Xmas-is-Friday-after-2038 bug in the BenchJS test (#7):

"Isn't 2038 the last year that can be calculated from the Epoch (Jan. 1, 1970) using a 4-byte value?"

Any comments?
     
bseely
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: San Francisco, CA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2005, 05:59 PM
 
yay! safari finally has kb/sec measurements back in the download window.
     
Eug Wanker  (op)
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2005, 09:22 PM
 
Java update now in Software Update, for 10.3.9.

Only 532 KB. Installed fine. No reboot required.
     
TETENAL
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FFM
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2005, 10:55 PM
 
Huh? There's nothing in that update but a blank file.
     
MartiNZ
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2005, 11:08 PM
 
Originally Posted by bseely
yay! safari finally has kb/sec measurements back in the download window.
You could get them before by option-clicking where it showed the time remaining .
     
Eug Wanker  (op)
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 21, 2005, 11:27 PM
 
Originally Posted by TETENAL
Huh? There's nothing in that update but a blank file.
About the Java Update for Mac OS X v10.3.9

After updating to Mac OS X 10.3.9, some systems may have issues with Java applications and Java-enabled websites when using Safari. Safari may unexpectedly quit, and standalone Java applications may unexpectedly quit or not launch. This update resolves that issue.
     
Eug Wanker  (op)
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Apr 22, 2005, 01:08 AM
 
Demo of Safari 1.3's editing function here.

Also, if you highlight a word on any web page and CTRL-click, you can Google search that word.
     
 
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 03:25 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,