|
|
Safari 1.3 (in Panther 10.3.9) is FAAAAST. Benches inside. (JPG) (Page 2)
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Eug Wanker
The selection in Safari 1.3 is way better than 1.2.
Can you show an instance where it is better? Just about everything I have tried shows it is worse.
|
Genius. You know who.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
8.67 secs here for the test. Not bad at all.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by nforcer
Can you show an instance where it is better? Just about everything I have tried shows it is worse.
When I used to select text in Safari, I'd often miss a letter or two at one end of the selected text. This no longer happens. With Safari 1.3, the text I try to select is the text I get. It's a huge improvement.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: LV-426
Status:
Offline
|
|
After moving English to the top in International, Safari 1.3 works
It is faster. A lot faster!
|
“Building Better Worlds”
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: ZZ9 Plural Z Alpha
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Eug Wanker
Note the small grey word...
|
|\|0\/\/ 15 7|-|3 71|\/|3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by CaptainHaddock
I just read the update at Dave Hyatt's website, and was impressed to learn that inline rich text editing is now part of Safari. CMS developers are going to love this!
I was glad to hear it, and particularly that they're supporting the de-facto standard designMode as well as the less-compatible but more-hyped contentEditable.
However, don't get your hopes up just yet. I've been looking at in-browser rich-text editors, and so far quite a few of them break completely under Safari 1.3. These will need to be updated to detect WebKit versions 312 or above and apply designMode to these, but not to older versions.
|
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
If anyone decides to do the BenchJS testing on their 10.3.8/Safari 1.2 machine, please check the results of Test 7 from 2038 on. According to the results in 10.3.9/Safari 1.3, every Xmas after 2037 occurs on a Friday.
I can't test 10.3.8 cuz all my machines have already been upgraded to 10.3.9.
P.S. How do in-browser RTF editors work?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: brooklyn ny
Status:
Offline
|
|
speed is nice! (altho means i have to learn to type faster... )
everytime i open "show all bookmarks" safari crashes
(this happened BEFORE i installed pithhelmet)
any ideas??
|
"At first, there was Nothing. Then Nothing inverted itself and became Something.
And that is what you all are: inverted Nothings...with potential" (Sun Ra)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Houston, TX
Status:
Offline
|
|
Indeed it much speedier, here are my results on a Tibook 667:
Safari 1.2.4: 120 sec.
Safari 1.3: 16 sec.
Firefox: 45 sec.
G4 optimized Firefox: 28 sec.
Internet Exploder: 82 sec.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
Status:
Offline
|
|
Safari is faster on that java test.
BUT
I've not found it any faster than using an optimized firefox build for "regular old" surfing. In fact, safari "feels" slower to me.
$0.02
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FFM
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by AKcrab
Safari is faster on that java test.
That test is a Java Script test.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hmmm... For some reason Safari crashes now with I try to drag a bookmark out of the bookmark bar. This feature was working fine in Safari 1.3 yesterday, and in Safari 1.2 the day before.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Detroit, MI
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by fisherKing
speed is nice! (altho means i have to learn to type faster... )
everytime i open "show all bookmarks" safari crashes
(this happened BEFORE i installed pithhelmet)
any ideas??
I have the same problem
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Detroit, MI
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Eug Wanker
Hmmm... For some reason Safari crashes now with I try to drag a bookmark out of the bookmark bar. This feature was working fine in Safari 1.3 yesterday, and in Safari 1.2 the day before.
Same here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Eug Wanker
Hmmm... For some reason Safari crashes now with I try to drag a bookmark out of the bookmark bar. This feature was working fine in Safari 1.3 yesterday, and in Safari 1.2 the day before.
No problem here. So you can't drag the default bookmarks out?
|
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Wasilla, Alaska
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by TETENAL
That test is a JavaScript test.
OMG! My whole comment is null and void!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: France
Status:
Offline
|
|
Don't wanna be rude, and YES, I really love the speedbump Safari has gotten, but the new Firefox 1.0.3 is still a bit faster, at least it looks like it. Haven't tried with a stopwatch, maybe I should run a benchmark, but I never really believed in it, since they can be tweaked as any other software I think?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Sitting in front of computer
Status:
Offline
|
|
Ive found that Camino/Firefox/Safari are now so near in speed that I simply choose which one I want to use by my preference to that particular app, and not the redering speed any more. I did a stopwatch test (after emptying all caches) on firefox/camino/safari on how fast they could open my tab group of 8 or so websites/fora, each one was pretty much the exact same, within a second oir two - and thats probably just me being slow on the stopwatch.
anyway - the faster the better
|
I free'd my mind... now it won't come back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Sydney, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Appleman
Don't wanna be rude, and YES, I really love the speedbump Safari has gotten, but the new Firefox 1.0.3 is still a bit faster, at least it looks like it. Haven't tried with a stopwatch, maybe I should run a benchmark, but I never really believed in it, since they can be tweaked as any other software I think?
Its more a visual defect with Safari - the progress bar in the location bar makes Safari feels slow, Even though it benches incredibly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Millennium
I was glad to hear it, and particularly that they're supporting the de-facto standard designMode as well as the less-compatible but more-hyped contentEditable.
However, don't get your hopes up just yet. I've been looking at in-browser rich-text editors, and so far quite a few of them break completely under Safari 1.3. These will need to be updated to detect WebKit versions 312 or above and apply designMode to these, but not to older versions.
As an update to my previous post: it looks like this is not just a browser-sniffing issue. Something is, in fact, seriously wrong with designMode support in Safari 1.3.
|
You are in Soviet Russia. It is dark. Grue is likely to be eaten by YOU!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Madison, WI
Status:
Offline
|
|
Thats in 2.0.
-Owl
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
21.51 seconds on Firefox 1.0 on Windows 2000, with a P4 1.6.
However, it seems that Test 7 is working correctly on Firefox, unlike both Safari 1.2 and Safari 1.3.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
does anyone remeber that name of the probram that will moddify the google search so you can do like google images and search this site right from it? i forgot it and i think i threw it away with my old safari
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: HMB, Ca
Status:
Offline
|
|
Safari crashes for me everytime on startup. I had SafariStand and Saft installed, which I assume has caused the problem. However, I've deleted both of those applications, deleted all preference files, and reinstalled using the Combo Updater several times and I still can't even get Safari to boot.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Detroit, MI
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by jay3ld
does anyone remeber that name of the probram that will moddify the google search so you can do like google images and search this site right from it? i forgot it and i think i threw it away with my old safari
Butler's search engines http://www.macupdate.com/info.php/id/12170
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Italy
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
iMac DVSE 400 640mb + AL PB 15" with 1 gig + iMac 2,8 with 4gb + MacBook Pro 2,53 with 4gb
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by elementality
Safari crashes for me everytime on startup. I had SafariStand and Saft installed, which I assume has caused the problem. However, I've deleted both of those applications, deleted all preference files, and reinstalled using the Combo Updater several times and I still can't even get Safari to boot.
heres what i did
when it crashed the window poped up saying it crashed.
I clicked send report.
i went though the bottom part and found out SIMBL was causing it.
so i would do that and find out what external thing is crashing your safari.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Pacific Northwest
Status:
Offline
|
|
Safari now shows your download speed and time remaining (in the Downloads window). No need to option-click to get that info anymore!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Eug Wanker
21.51 seconds on Firefox 1.0 on Windows 2000, with a P4 1.6.
However, it seems that Test 7 is working correctly on Firefox, unlike both Safari 1.2 and Safari 1.3.
I just tried IE 5.2 on OS X as well. It completes Test 7 correctly too (although the overall bench is slow, at 64.9 seconds on a TiBook 1 GHz).
This Xmas day calculation bug seems to be unique to Safari, including 1.2, 1.3, and apparently 2.0 as well.
P.S. Here's a great way to crash Safari... I found this in the comments in Dave Hyatt's blog.
Go to Wild360.com and click on "(More...)". Safari crashes every time.
(
Last edited by Eug Wanker; Apr 18, 2005 at 11:42 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chile
Status:
Offline
|
|
someone bench it against opera 8 please.
|
:: frankenstein / lcd-less TiBook / 1GHz / radeon 9000 64MB / 1GB RAM / w/ext. 250GB fw drive / noname usb bluetooth dongle / d-link usb 2.0 pcmcia card / X.5.8
:: unibody macbook pro / 2.4 Ghz C2D / 6GB RAM / dell 2407wfp - X.6.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
Is the Copy Image (to clipboard) contextual menu command broken for anyone else? For me it is only copying the URL. Oh well, can't have everything. . .
|
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
Google emailed me back about my bug report for maps.google.com. They say it's now fixed for Safari 1.3. (I can't check since I don't have a Mac with me.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
They sent me an email too, since I reported the same issue. It is fixed now, and works better than before (when it worked).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 1999
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Sarc
someone bench it against opera 8 please.
Look for the name lunddal:
I also tested Safari and it's on a DP2.5GHz PM.
|
JLL
- My opinions may have changed, but not the fact that I am right.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Midwest, USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
SafariStand ( http://macupdate.com/info.php/id/16687) - disable favicons, disable animated GIFs, add image resizing, enable address bar searching of Google, MacUpdate, Amazon, and more...very useful and free. Then download the ad-blocking CSS from the Web ( http://www.floppymoose.com/) or use Camino's and dump Pith Helmet. I'm not trying to put PH down, it's just that you get these other replacements for free and they don't slow Safari to a crawl.
|
MacBook C2D 2.0GHz/Combo/2GB RAM
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Chile
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by JLL
Look for the name lunddal:
I also tested Safari and it's on a DP2.5GHz PM.
thx for the benches.
|
:: frankenstein / lcd-less TiBook / 1GHz / radeon 9000 64MB / 1GB RAM / w/ext. 250GB fw drive / noname usb bluetooth dongle / d-link usb 2.0 pcmcia card / X.5.8
:: unibody macbook pro / 2.4 Ghz C2D / 6GB RAM / dell 2407wfp - X.6.3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
"It's not a bug, it's a feature..."
I do love these guys....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by nforcer
It still has a debug menu, which means it still has debug code, which means it is not as snappy as it could be
Whilst I'm aware you're joking your comment raises an interesting point. I think it could be a good idea for there to be a (visible) preference to enable an "Advanced" menu or "Web Developer" menu since some of the functions are particularly useful for more than just debugging purposes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Italy
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Meteo
I am already using it and it works fine in Omniweb and Firefox but nothing loads in Safari. I don't know weather Safari tries to use the Acrobat plugin or the Schubert one, it's difficult to know as it isn' t loading anything. It simply says "This operation is not allowed"
|
iMac DVSE 400 640mb + AL PB 15" with 1 gig + iMac 2,8 with 4gb + MacBook Pro 2,53 with 4gb
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Italy
Status:
Offline
|
|
Found the solution now, I removed the acrobat plugin, in Safari it created a conflict leaving me without a working plugin. Don't know why it caused a problem only in Safari but...........
|
iMac DVSE 400 640mb + AL PB 15" with 1 gig + iMac 2,8 with 4gb + MacBook Pro 2,53 with 4gb
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Dark Side of the Moon
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by jay3ld
does anyone remeber that name of the probram that will moddify the google search so you can do like google images and search this site right from it? i forgot it and i think i threw it away with my old safari
I think you mean acid search: http://www.pozytron.com/acidsearch
On another note, does anyone find Safari using loads of ram? It seems to use over 100 MB after a few minutes use. Did it always do this? I'm trying it our after using Camino for ages, I thought that was a ram-hog, by using about 70 MB.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: France
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Mike Pither
Found the solution now, I removed the acrobat plugin, in Safari it created a conflict leaving me without a working plugin. Don't know why it caused a problem only in Safari but...........
Safari did this before the update when you had Acrobat installed,
as it had a conflict with Preview I guess. There was no way to tell Safari to use Acrobat instead of Preview, or the other way around. Deleting Acrobat was the best thing to do. Preview is faster anyway. But I can understand that some people want or need Acrobat for whatever reason, I don't. To me it sucks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: England, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
I must admit over the last few months i have been using firefox as it has been much faster than safari... however after seeing these results i am impressed.
Now its the fastest browser on planet earth
Move over firefox - bring my safari back when i get tiger
|
MacBook • 13.3" MacBook Aluminum Unibody, 2.4GHz Core 2 Duo, 2GB, 250GB
iMac G5 • 20" iMac G5, 1.8GHz, 1GB, 160GB, SD, AP, BT/KB/MS
iPod Mini • Silver, 4GB
iPhone 3G • Black, 16GB
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
Posted elsewhere, about the every-Xmas-is-Friday-after-2038 bug in the BenchJS test (#7):
"Isn't 2038 the last year that can be calculated from the Epoch (Jan. 1, 1970) using a 4-byte value?"
Any comments?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: San Francisco, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
yay! safari finally has kb/sec measurements back in the download window.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
Java update now in Software Update, for 10.3.9.
Only 532 KB. Installed fine. No reboot required.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FFM
Status:
Offline
|
|
Huh? There's nothing in that update but a blank file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by bseely
yay! safari finally has kb/sec measurements back in the download window.
You could get them before by option-clicking where it showed the time remaining .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by TETENAL
Huh? There's nothing in that update but a blank file.
About the Java Update for Mac OS X v10.3.9
After updating to Mac OS X 10.3.9, some systems may have issues with Java applications and Java-enabled websites when using Safari. Safari may unexpectedly quit, and standalone Java applications may unexpectedly quit or not launch. This update resolves that issue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Dangling something in the water… of the Arabian Sea
Status:
Offline
|
|
Demo of Safari 1.3's editing function here.
Also, if you highlight a word on any web page and CTRL-click, you can Google search that word.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|