|
|
is IDE DVD writer compatible
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Pune, India
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hi,
I am planning to bu a Windows compatible internal EIDE DVD writer. I will bu a USB enclosure and connec to my 12" PB. The DVD writer box says it is compatible with Windows.
Is it possible to connect to my PB ? I am already using an IDE harddisk connected using USB enclosure. I am not sure abt DVD writer.
anyone?
cheers,
ashish
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Admin Emeritus
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Zurich, Switzerland
Status:
Offline
|
|
It should work as long as it's USB 2. I'd recommend going with FireWire, though.
tooki
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Pune, India
Status:
Offline
|
|
After posting this question, I searched the net and found issues regarding compatibility. I checked xlr8yourmac.com database but could not find a report as didnt have the model number.
I will tes at a local shop. I may not find a firewire enclosure in india
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Great White North
Status:
Offline
|
|
for the most part all IDE CD Roms/ DVD Roms/ Burners work, but none of them will work with Apples software like iDVD. You should check the compatability with Roxio and use Roxio Easy CD Creator with any external drive. Ive tested out prob 8 brands, all worked fine. Whats important is if you get a firewire enclosure it has a oxford chipset, those seemed to work the best.
|
Blandine Bureau 1940 - 2011
Missed 2012 by 3 days, RIP Grandma :-(
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Heaven
Status:
Offline
|
|
why would you reccomend firewire over usb2?
Usb 2 is faster than firewire... but other than that, what difference does it make?
|
::: r00t ::: - 15" PBook / 1.25 GB/ 1.33Ghz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Utah
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by skelotar
why would you reccomend firewire over usb2?
Usb 2 is faster than firewire... but other than that, what difference does it make?
On paper USB 2 is faster, but in practice it rarely is.
Here is a good example
Taken from KCGeek:
"FireWire can sustain peak throughput indefinitely, without taxing your CPU, and is inherently peer-to-peer. USB2.0 is not inherently peer-to-peer and requires significantly more CPU to maximize throughput. 1394 (aka Firewire) is generally regarded to be a superior interface, somewhat analagous to being the SCSI to USB2.0's EIDE."
|
Work: 2008 8x3.2 MacPro, 8800GT, 16GB ram, zillions of HDs. (video editing)
Home: 2008 24" 2.8 iMac, 2TB Int, 4GB ram.
Road: 2009 13" 2.26 Macbook Pro, 8GB ram & 640GB WD blue internal
Retired to BOINC only: My trusty never-gonna-die 12" iBook G4 1.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Oct 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
please find my experiences and infos reported here
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Heaven
Status:
Offline
|
|
ohhh.. ok.. thanks for clearing that up for me. Always wondered about that...
|
::: r00t ::: - 15" PBook / 1.25 GB/ 1.33Ghz
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|