Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Community > MacNN Lounge > Apple, Inc & Apple Corps Reach Accord

Apple, Inc & Apple Corps Reach Accord
Thread Tools
Eynstyn
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: May 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 5, 2007, 12:40 PM
 


Apple Inc and Apple Corps said in a joint statement today that they have entered into a new trademark agreement that effectively replaces their prior 1991 agreement over the use of the corporate name "Apple".

Under this new agreement, Apple Inc. will own all of the trademarks related to “Apple” and will license certain of those trademarks back to Apple Corps for their continued use. In addition, the ongoing trademark lawsuit between the companies will end, with each party bearing its own legal costs, and Apple Inc. will continue using its name and logos on iTunes. The terms of settlement are confidential.

Commenting on the settlement, Steve Jobs, Apple’s CEO said, “We love the Beatles, and it has been painful being at odds with them over these trademarks. It feels great to resolve this in a positive manner, and in a way that should remove the potential of further disagreements in the future.”
Apple Inc has been victorious under a recent lawsuit from Apple Corps (the Beatles' record label) regarding the use of the Apple logo on the iTunes Store. Recent rumors fueled by Steve Jobs playing Beatles music on his iPhone at MacWorld SF have pegged the Beatles coming to the iTunes store perhaps this month (Valentines Day?).

Mac Rumors: Apple Inc and Apple Corps Form New Trademark Agreement

LONDON, Feb 5 (Reuters) - Apple Inc. (AAPL.O: Quote, Profile , Research) has settled its long-running trademark dispute with The Beatles' company, Apple Corps Ltd, in a deal that could finally pave the way for the Fab Four's songs to be sold on the iTunes music store.

The two companies said Apple Inc. would now own all the trademarks related to "Apple" and would license certain trademarks back to Apple Corps for continued use.
Reuters Pictures

Editors Choice: Images from Super Bowl XLI View Slideshow


"We love the Beatles, and it has been painful being at odds with them over these trademarks," Apple Chief Executive Steve Jobs said in a statement.

Neil Aspinall, manager of Apple Corps, said it was great to put the dispute behind them and move on. "The years ahead are going to be very exciting times for us. We wish Apple Inc. every success and look forward to many years of peaceful cooperation with them."

The dispute centres around a 1991 trademark agreement between the two sides regarding the use of their respective apple-shaped logos. The music firm said that the computer company had violated the agreement by moving into the music business through its market-leading iTunes online store. In May 2006 a judge at the High Court in London sided with Apple Inc. Apple Corps, owned by Paul McCartney, Ringo Starr, John Lennon's widow Yoko Ono and the estate of George Harrison, said it would appeal.

Apple, which has sold over a billion downloads, had argued that iTunes was primarily a data transmission service and that it was permitted by the agreement. Continued...

Photo Slideshow | Reuters.com
She Loves You - The Beatles Music - Lyrics

Click here for Beatles wav file.
( Last edited by Eynstyn; Feb 5, 2007 at 01:00 PM. )
     
Eynstyn  (op)
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: May 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 5, 2007, 12:50 PM
 
Background information.


The Beatles set up Apple Corps in 1968

Apple giants do battle in court

The Beatles' record label Apple Corps has accused Apple Computer in court of breaching a trademark agreement by selling music.

Both companies reached a deal over the use of the apple trademark in 1991, which stopped Apple Computer from entering the music business.

But Apple Corps claims the US company's online iTunes Music Store has broken the agreement.

The hearing opened at the High Court in London on Wednesday.

Deal 'violation'

Apple Corps, owned by former Beatles stars Sir Paul McCartney, Ringo Starr and the widows of John Lennon and George Harrison, was founded in 1968.

Apple Computer, the firm whose home computers helped launch the personal computer industry, was founded in 1976.

Geoffrey Vos QC, representing Apple Corps, said the computer firm had been keen to use the Apple brand on its Music Store and offered to buy the rights from Apple Corps for $1m (£576,500) just before iTunes launched.

The offer was rejected by Neil Aspinall, Apple Corps' managing director.

Mr Vos claimed Apple Computer founder Steve Jobs had said downloading music from the internet was now no different from buying a record.

He argued the US computing giant violated the deal by selling music online and its argument that it used the apple mark only in connection with a delivery system was "plainly wrong".

Mr Vos told the court that calling iTunes a mere electronic device was a "perversion" of the 1991 deal.

He added that the Apple logo was prominent on the iTunes website and almost every advert for it carried the logo.

Mr Vos said: "[Apple] Computer was promoting a store at which to buy music, and more particularly, Computer's musical recordings - permanent downloads - with special characteristics.

"No objective onlooker could think otherwise."

Mr Vos demonstrated to the judge, a self-confessed iPod owner, how to download from music store.

He chose the 1978 disco hit Le Freak by Chic which sounded in the courtroom as he pointed out to the judge how many times the "apple" logo appeared on the website as he went through the procedure on the equipment set up in the courtroom.

The computer company's logo is an apple with a section removed out of the side. The record company is represented by a complete green Granny Smith apple.

An agreement between the two companies to share use of the Apple trademark was first established in 1981.

But as Apple Computer's business increasingly entered the world of entertainment, the company sought a less restrictive trademark agreement and a court battle ensued in 1989.

Details of the eventual deal, thrashed out in London's High Court over two years, were never disclosed - but Apple Corps was believed to have emerged with about $30m (£17m) from the computer firm.

The launch of the iPod, a portable music player, in 2001, and the launch of its iTunes music store two years later has prompted the latest battle between the two firms.

About three million songs are downloaded every day from the service.

Tracks by The Beatles have not been licensed for downloading and are not available on the service.

Apple Corps is seeking to reinstate the 1991 deal and receive financial damages.
Story from BBC NEWS:
BBC NEWS | Entertainment | Apple giants do battle in court

Published: 2006/03/29 14:12:29 GMT

© BBC MMVII


Apple Chief Executive Steve Jobs introduces new iPod Nanos to the crowd at the Yerba Buena Center of the Arts theater in San Francisco
( Last edited by Eynstyn; Feb 5, 2007 at 12:57 PM. )
     
Big Mac
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 5, 2007, 01:19 PM
 
Now Apple owns everything and licenses rights back to Apple Records. Pretty cool.

"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
     
olePigeon
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 1999
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 5, 2007, 03:01 PM
 
Originally Posted by Big Mac View Post
Now Apple owns everything and licenses rights back to Apple Records. Pretty cool.
[ping]

Aah! I see you have the machine that goes 'ping'. This is my favourite. You see, we lease this back from the company we sold it to, and that way, it comes under the monthly current budget and not the capital account.

[applause]

Thank you. Thank you. We try to do our best. Well, do carry on.
"…I contend that we are both atheists. I just believe in one fewer god than
you do. When you understand why you dismiss all the other possible gods,
you will understand why I dismiss yours." - Stephen F. Roberts
     
gururafiki
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Good question...
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 5, 2007, 04:51 PM
 
This just means that we will see more than The Beatles Tribute Band in iTunes now.
     
Chuckit
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA, USA
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 5, 2007, 05:16 PM
 
Wow, so Apple blatantly violates their agreement, and in return, Apple Corps surrenders. Near.
Chuck
___
"Instead of either 'multi-talented' or 'multitalented' use 'bisexual'."
     
Eynstyn  (op)
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: May 2005
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 6, 2007, 12:09 AM
 
Originally Posted by Chuckit View Post
Wow, so Apple blatantly violates their agreement, and in return, Apple Corps surrenders. Near.
Quick, name five Beatles songs.
     
gururafiki
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Good question...
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 6, 2007, 12:34 PM
 
Blatantly violates their agreement? I thought the UK courts found Apple innocent of any wrongdoing?
     
Dakar²
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: The Annals of MacNN History
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 6, 2007, 12:40 PM
 
Originally Posted by Chuckit View Post
Wow, so Apple blatantly violates their agreement, and in return, Apple Corps surrenders.
I know, it's enough to make my guitar gently weep.
     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:04 PM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,