|
|
Prophecy: We'll laugh about Stacks one day.
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sudbury, ON
Status:
Offline
|
|
The year will be 2010-something, and some of us will say: "Hey! remember Stacks, in 2007? Wasn't that a riot?
: )
Heck, I'm already chuckling.
|
.................................................. .................................................. ..................................www.DNCH.com
.................................................. .................................................. .......................www.daniel.poirier.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
I hope that stacks becomes what we saw in early builds and will still be used in 2010, however I sure will be laughing at this version of stacks.
It reminds me of 10.0 with the ridiculous transparencies and other peculiarities. A sign of great potential while at the same time being a really horrible implementation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Dec 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
I think people are laughing at them now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Canada... be nice, eh?
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by dzp111
The year will be 2010-something, and some of us will say: "Hey! remember Stacks, in 2007? Wasn't that a riot?
: )
Heck, I'm already chuckling.
I may be sticking my neck out on this one, but I like the grid feature on my Downloads folder. Yes, it may a little eye candy, but it is nice to quickly look in a folder without opening up the finder...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Aug 2007
Status:
Offline
|
|
Stacks aren't a total loss. Compared to docked folders, they save you two clicks: single-click to launch an item instead of double-click, and no need to close the Finder window afterwards. It would be nicer if they added a vertical scroll bar to the Grid view so you could fit ALL contents in the stack.
Then again, I just hide my dock and use Spotlight for everything, so I don't care either way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
It's the icon(s) on the Dock that are the primary problem with stacks. The same folder/stack, can change icon periodically (as the folder content changes), and the icon can be very misleading, even if it doesn't change.
Another big problem with them, is that you can no longer just click on the icon to open the folder. You've got to right click and then show in Finder then open, or click, move mouse all the way to the top, click. Dumb.
The overall idea is good (eg, has potential to save desktop clutter, and improve organisation), but as the OP suggests, it was poorly implemented.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: I'm at the sneak point.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Oliver is on to something, it would be a great implementation of stacks if you could get perhaps a slimmed down version of the finder, with a sidebar and column view. You would have to double click to open something, but it would anchor the finder for easy access..
Just thinkin...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Calgary
Status:
Offline
|
|
I don't get what the big deal is. I've been doing this forever with my dock folders just by right-clicking on them
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: North Carolina
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Wiskedjak
I don't get what the big deal is. I've been doing this forever with my dock folders just by right-clicking on them
Well, I've never seen anything more complicated in my life. It's like a column view list with icons in it, how can you possibly make sense of that??? And your Applications folder icon doesn't look like the Address Book icon. How are you supposed to know that it is your Applications folder if it doesn't look like an Address Book?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Switzerland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by jasonsRX7
Well, I've never seen anything more complicated in my life. It's like a column view list with icons in it, how can you possibly make sense of that??? And your Applications folder icon doesn't look like the Address Book icon. How are you supposed to know that it is your Applications folder if it doesn't look like an Address Book?
Well said.
On the other hand, looking at what I get today in the Dock, > > .
Nice prophesy about the laughing, though... we'll definitely laugh at and about Stacks, but not (only) in 2010.
|
MBP 15" 2.33GHz C2D 3GB 2*23" ACD
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Aug 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by OliverTwist
Stacks aren't a total loss. Compared to docked folders, they save you two clicks: single-click to launch an item instead of double-click, and no need to close the Finder window afterwards.
Oh so clueless.
|
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Auckland, NZ
Status:
Offline
|
|
Heh, good times.
I now have just two stacks, Home and Work, each with 6 items, few enough so they still fan out, and if I'm bored I can entertain myself by fanning and unfanning for a while. I'll keep everyone posted with my progress .
It did annoy me in Tiger that those three items at the bottom of the list appeared, but that was easily fixed through editing the dock menus file; that and the invisible files that appeared in the root directory .. again easily fixed. What to fix now with Stacks ... where to start!
Meantime, I'll join in the .
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Beautiful Downtown Portland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Brass
It's the icon(s) on the Dock that are the primary problem with stacks. The same folder/stack, can change icon periodically (as the folder content changes), and the icon can be very misleading, even if it doesn't change.
Another big problem with them, is that you can no longer just click on the icon to open the folder. You've got to right click and then show in Finder then open, or click, move mouse all the way to the top, click. Dumb.
The overall idea is good (eg, has potential to save desktop clutter, and improve organisation), but as the OP suggests, it was poorly implemented.
QFT
|
"There he goes. One of God's own prototypes. Some kind of high powered mutant never even considered for mass production. Too weird to live, and too rare to die." -- Hunter S. Thompson
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Nov 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
There are many ways to use the Dock. For the way my brain works, it's hard to beat the speed and efficiency of this:
|
Leopard 10.5.x •• 2.66Ghz Mac Pro, 7 Gigs RAM •• dual 20 Samsung LCDs •• MacBook Core Duo 13" 2Ghz White
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Oh goodie, another thread! Can I play?
Having replaced the default folder icons with those from 10.4 and having gone back to the Dock from pre-WWDC '07 (oh the irony of how we whinged when ADC members were denied it for weeks), I can at last join the gaggle of laughter at stacks seeing as how they affect me no more
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sudbury, ON
Status:
Offline
|
|
This just occurred to me..
I had a friend over last night (Windows user all his life). I gave him a quick tour of Leopard.
Then I showed him the stacks at which point he said "WOW! That is sooo cool!"
So there it is.
: )
|
.................................................. .................................................. ..................................www.DNCH.com
.................................................. .................................................. .......................www.daniel.poirier.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by dzp111
Then I showed him the stacks at which point he said "WOW! That is sooo cool!"
Oh yeah, stacks are cool to look at - most of Mac OS X is cool to look at. It's just a PITA when the looky-feely camp beats the functionality camp in an important rock-paper-scissors meeting at Apple HQ.
In all honesty I do have to concede that I appreciated the "sort by date added" option (esp. in my downloads folder), which for some reason hasn't made it into any of the normal Finder window view options.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Feb 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
I know many of you liked the hierarchical folders in the Dock, but for me--a person who uses Spotlight to find everything--Stacks is quite enjoyable.
The hierarchical file system as we know it is coming to an end. I believe future operating systems will use different logic to abstract files and the relations between them. Viewed this way, Apple's Stacks feature may be a step ahead and not necessarily a step backwards.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
1. It looks like ass, subjectively.
2. It functions like ass, objectively.
3. Other than perhaps the sorting option, how in the world is better than classic Dock menus?
|
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: A House of Ill-Repute in the Sky
Status:
Offline
|
|
How does it act when you have a ridiculous amount of items in a folder? Let's say like 100-200.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
Truncated grid across the whole screen.
|
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Badly. You get the first 80 items and then a curvy arrow with the title "XX Mo...Finder" telling you how many more icons you'll be able to see in a Finder window.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: PDX
Status:
Offline
|
|
I think something that Apple can (and should) add to Stacks is simply the ability to right-click on a Stack and get the "old style" of list of that particular folder.
That, and the ability to turn off the icon changing thing.
If they make those 2 changes I think Stacks will live on.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
So Geo, there's no developer build with a version of the good Dock that also supports Spaces, right?
|
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: A House of Ill-Repute in the Sky
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Big Mac
Truncated grid across the whole screen.
That doesn't sound too bad.
Originally Posted by Geobunny
Badly. You get the first 80 items and then a curvy arrow with the title "XX Mo...Finder" telling you how many more icons you'll be able to see in a Finder window.
That does.
Though I guess from an objective standpoint, that's still an improvement over navigating a large folder from the dock previously.
Except for the whole clicking to open the finder window thing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Edinburgh, Scotland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Big Mac
So Geo, there's no developer build with a version of the good Dock that also supports Spaces, right?
What makes you say that
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Aug 2007
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Brass
It's the icon(s) on the Dock that are the primary problem with stacks. The same folder/stack, can change icon periodically (as the folder content changes), and the icon can be very misleading, even if it doesn't change.
Agreed - I forgot to mention the obviously ridiculous stack icons.
Originally Posted by Big Mac
Oh so clueless.
?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
Oliver, apparently you don't know about classic Dock menus because you said that you only used Docked folders to open Finder windows.
|
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Aug 2007
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Big Mac
Oliver, apparently you don't know about classic Dock menus because you said that you only used Docked folders to open Finder windows.
Is that what this is about? You came in this thread specifically to be an ass to me? Are you starman under a new name or something? Seriously, get a life. I forgot about the contextual menu - sue me for my transgressions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Sep 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Oh yay, another stacks thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by OliverTwist
Is that what this is about? You came in this thread specifically to be an ass to me? Are you starman under a new name or something? Seriously, get a life. I forgot about the contextual menu - sue me for my transgressions.
I responded to you because it seems that many people like Stacks only because they had no idea about Dock folder menus, a feature that is far superior and that has existed for the last six years. It's just infuriating, especially after everything that's been written on the subject around here.
|
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
I think that the one and only area where I see stacks as being more convenient than traditional menu navigation is in the instance of downloading files. That way, for the average user, the desktop won't get cluttered up with all sorts of icons, and you can easily see what has happened to your most recent download, since it's right in your dock. So in this regard, stacks is a good feature. For everything else though, it's just cluttered and strange.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: brooklyn ny
Status:
Offline
|
|
options, apple should give us options. for someone who likes it: stacks. for the rest of us, hierarchal menus.
i for one spent a lot of time organizing my life (ie my mac) into folders,subfolders. naming files correctly (except photos, easy to deal with in iphoto, or column view, or coverflow).
losing the ability to navigate thru levels of folders is a drag.
so...am waiting for fruitmenu, my fave navigation app.
|
"At first, there was Nothing. Then Nothing inverted itself and became Something.
And that is what you all are: inverted Nothings...with potential" (Sun Ra)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
That's exactly what we've been asking for. (See Stacks Usability thread.) Unfortunately, much like the request to have a clean separation between spatial and browser Finder modes, Apple would probably prefer we switch to Windows instead of giving us the simple things we request.
|
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Feb 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by dzp111
This just occurred to me..
I had a friend over last night (Windows user all his life). I gave him a quick tour of Leopard.
Then I showed him the stacks at which point he said "WOW! That is sooo cool!"
So there it is.
: )
There you have it, confirmation it is a piece of ****!
|
I look forward to a future where the present will be in the past.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Feb 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Big Mac
That's exactly what we've been asking for. (See Stacks Usability thread.) Unfortunately, much like the request to have a clean separation between spatial and browser Finder modes, Apple would probably prefer we switch to Windows instead of giving us the simple things we request.
Neatly put!
|
I look forward to a future where the present will be in the past.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Nov 2000
Location: Tasmania, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Kerrigan
I think that the one and only area where I see stacks as being more convenient than traditional menu navigation is in the instance of downloading files. That way, for the average user, the desktop won't get cluttered up with all sorts of icons, and you can easily see what has happened to your most recent download, since it's right in your dock. So in this regard, stacks is a good feature. For everything else though, it's just cluttered and strange.
Sort of agree with you, but downloads has nothing to do with stacks. The downloads go to a default folder. That folder is (by default) on the Dock. In Leopard, that is represented by a Stack. In Tiger (if you'd done it in Tiger - which you could, it just wasn't the default) it would have been represented by a folder.
The Tiger implementation was still superior to the Leopard one for most users.
Leopard did well to clean up the desktop clutter by implementing a download folder and having it on the Dock. Stacks did nothing to improve Desktop clutter. This is marketing bunk from Apple.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Dec 2006
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by tuqqer
There are many ways to use the Dock. For the way my brain works, it's hard to beat the speed and efficiency of this:
Dang, that's nice. Wish I knew about that when I had Tiger. I don't see a way to do that in Leopard. (warning: noob alert)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
It's amazing so many people apparently missed the feature all those years.
|
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Baninated
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: In yer threads
Status:
Offline
|
|
I like stacks for certain things. I don't think stacks are bad. I think not giving us a choice between stacks, and having a list view like the screenshot above is however bad.
So in general stacks aren't bad. Lack of choice is however.
I used the list in the dock as a Apple menu replacement since before the public beta days. It was were I kept apps I used, but not all the time. It's also where I keep all my document templates for InDesign. And stacks simply don't work in that way. What Apple needs to do is offer the ability to have a stack folder, or a regular folder.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Always within bluetooth range
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Kevin
What Apple needs to do is offer the ability to have a stack folder, or a regular folder.
Precisely .... problem solved. I don't hate stacks, but there are some folders I would love to just leave as s d@mn folder, y'know. Some things are better found through hiearchy than spotlight ... especially if you don't know the name of what you are looking for.
The fanning behavior becomes downright annoying when it has more than a few items.
(
Last edited by Krusty; Nov 6, 2007 at 10:12 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by opus_az
Dang, that's nice. Wish I knew about that when I had Tiger. I don't see a way to do that in Leopard. (warning: noob alert)
Opus I said the same thing and I am definitely not a noob. I wish we could do that it leopard. It would beat these aliases I have on my desktop.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Always within bluetooth range
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by MOTHERWELL
Opus I said the same thing and I am definitely not a noob. I wish we could do that it leopard. It would beat these aliases I have on my desktop.
Wow, I'm sorta surprised more people didn't know about this .... it's one of the key elements of the Mac OS and the reason I've never had any desktop shortcuts -- just a folder in the dock straight to my Home and Applications folders (and any other folder I needed to access directly and traverse rapidly) that are always available and always on top. This ability to make a folder into an instant, navigable hierarchy has been around since way back in the Classic Mac OS days (via the Apple Menu at that time). I wonder if people who used Macs prior to OS X are more prone to find and use this feature since it roughly duplicated functionality of the old Apple Menu. I REALLY do miss being able to burrow down directly to what I need, 3 or 4 levels deep, without having to open finder windows along the way .... now our only option is to go one level deep, open that folder in a finder window and then go through window after window on the way down
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FFM
Status:
Offline
|
|
Discoverability of the stacks feature is apparently way better. Even if Apple had default folders in the Dock in Tiger many user wouldn't have discovered the popup menu.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Amsterdam, NL
Status:
Offline
|
|
Wow we actually need a second thread about this?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by TETENAL
Discoverability of the stacks feature is apparently way better. Even if Apple had default folders in the Dock in Tiger many user wouldn't have discovered the popup menu.
Sure, discovery is a lot better if Apple promotes the feature all over the place. Apple never did that for Dock folders before.
|
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FFM
Status:
Offline
|
|
It's way better including for people who have never seen Apple's marketing material.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Calgary
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by TETENAL
It's way better including for people who have never seen Apple's marketing material.
What mythical creatures are you speaking of? People who have never seen Apple's marketing material?
Having said that, the previous functionality could be more discoverable without going all the way to Stacks. Discovery is moot in light of Stacks' other usability issues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: California
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by mjankor
I hope that stacks becomes what we saw in early builds and will still be used in 2010, however I sure will be laughing at this version of stacks.
How were they in early builds?
|
20" iMac C2D/2.4GHz 3GB RAM 10.6.8 (10H549)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|