 |
 |
3g iPhone pics?
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Oct 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
2002 Mac Mini i5 8GB 256GB SSD
2013 Macbook Air 4GB/128GB
iPad Mini A7 32GB
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
Bush Tax Cuts == Job Killer
June 2001: 132,047,000 employed
June 2003: 129,839,000 employed
2.21 million jobs were LOST after 2 years of Bush Tax Cuts.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Colorado
Status:
Offline
|
|
It's a concept, but many are considering it to probably be similar to what will be announced.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: Washington, DC
Status:
Offline
|
|
The overall shape of the face-on image is too Blackberrish. Although, my initial reaction was one of "Ooooo..." The profile, though looks nice. I like the button on the lower right side, presumably for snaping pictures. Also, note the front-sided camera.
I'd kinda be surprised if Apple added all of these features and succeeded in making the iPhone slimmer. Still, we can hope.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Your Anus
Status:
Offline
|
|
Here's what I would like. Keep it roughly the same, but get rid of the chrome. Have multiple colors available and make the apple logo more subtle. I don't want to shout to the world "hey look at me, I have an iPhone" every time I make a call. Something solid black without a big logo on it would be great.
|
My sig is 1 pixel too big.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
This one looks more realistic.
Note: The release version probably won't have the ? mark.
|
|
Bush Tax Cuts == Job Killer
June 2001: 132,047,000 employed
June 2003: 129,839,000 employed
2.21 million jobs were LOST after 2 years of Bush Tax Cuts.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Toronto, Ontario
Status:
Offline
|
|
Cant wait until it comes out.
do you think one will be able to use other service providers immediately? after jailbreak/pwnage obviously?
|
|
R.I.P Steve Jobs
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Colorado
Status:
Offline
|
|
No, not until the 5 year AT&T contract is up. Jailbreaking will become less prevalent after this update.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by imitchellg5 
No, not until the 5 year AT&T contract is up. Jailbreaking will become less prevalent after this update.
*start ahole*
Im so sick and tired of this bullcrap that some users spout like they are all knowing. you DO NOT know what is going to happen, so don't pretend you do...
*end ahole*
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator  Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Polwaristan
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by ballison
*start ahole*
Im so sick and tired of this bullcrap that some users spout like they are all knowing. you DO NOT know what is going to happen, so don't pretend you do...
*end ahole*
First, "ahole" quotes don't really let you be an ahole. I'm saying that as a member, not a moderator.
Second, you need to separate wishful thinking versus US contract law to appreciate the terms of AT&T's exclusive deal. Apple can't simply renege on it. Without some sort of policy change indicator to the contrary -- public statements, leaked discussions, etc. -- we DO know, to a high probability, that they'll stay with AT&T.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Cold Warrior
First, "ahole" quotes don't really let you be an ahole. I'm saying that as a member, not a moderator.
Second, you need to separate wishful thinking versus US contract law to appreciate the terms of AT&T's exclusive deal. Apple can't simply renege on it. Without some sort of policy change indicator to the contrary -- public statements, leaked discussions, etc. -- we DO know, to a high probability, that they'll stay with AT&T.
not trying to say I was allowed, just giving a warning...
I wasn't referring to the AT&T's contract, just the fact that he said jailbreaking will become less prevalent after the update. there's no way to know what will happen so why is he saying it as pure fact? it just irks me a little bit
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Colorado
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by ballison
not trying to say I was allowed, just giving a warning...
I wasn't referring to the AT&T's contract, just the fact that he said jailbreaking will become less prevalent after the update. there's no way to know what will happen so why is he saying it as pure fact? it just irks me a little bit
But why do most people jailbreak? To add functionality that isn't there. What will this update do? Add most of the functionality that people want. Look through the jailbreaking threads around the internet. You'll see that not a huge number of people are jailbreaking to change services (in the US). Sorry to irk you. And I don't want to sound condescending, but I'm a paying developer and I know a lot more than the normal internet lurker will.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Status:
Offline
|
|
How about an iPhone nano, phone+iPod, but no internet?
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: MacNN database error. Please refresh your browser.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by lpkmckenna
How about an iPhone nano, phone+iPod, but no internet?
UGh. Maybe for kiddies/those with Downs but still trendy.
|
This is a computer-generated message and needs no signature.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top