Welcome to the MacNN Forums.

If this is your first visit, be sure to check out the FAQ by clicking the link above. You may have to register before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.

You are here: MacNN Forums > Enthusiast Zone > Hardware Hacking > Early 2006 iMac CPU & RAM upgrades

Early 2006 iMac CPU & RAM upgrades
Thread Tools
Rainy Day
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Oregon
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Feb 26, 2011, 07:29 PM
 
It looks like one can upgrade an early 2006 17-inch iMac (MA199LL, aka iMac4,1) with a 64-bit Core 2 Duo CPU, effectively turning it into a late 2006 17-inch iMac (MA590LL). Question is, will this allow it to address more RAM (i.e. up to 3GB), like the MA590LL? Was the 32-bit CPU the reason for the 2GB RAM limit?

Trying to decide if it makes sense to upgrade an old iMac running Mac OS X Leopard Server to Lion. The machine has adequate performance, but it would be nice to have more RAM. With compatible Core 2 Duo's running about $80, this may be a decent way to go.
     
Waragainstsleep
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 17, 2011, 11:23 AM
 
Very good question. I suspect you'd have to try it to answer it.
I have plenty of more important things to do, if only I could bring myself to do them....
     
Rainy Day  (op)
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Oregon
Status: Offline
Reply With Quote
Mar 17, 2011, 02:31 PM
 
I suppose there's also the question of whether the firmware would need to be flashed to even get 64-bit capabilities from the CPU? So it's conceivable that upgrading the CPU won't achieve much of anything (if it can't run in 64-bit mode)… except maybe a faster rate on the new CPU.

At any rate, it's beginning to look like Lion works on 32-bit CPUs, even if it won't be officially supported (which remains an open question until Apple publishes its minimal hardware requirements list for Lion). For more info, see: Mac OS X Lion *does* run on Core Duos/Core Solos

Apple seems to have an arbitrary cutoff of the systems it supports with each OS refresh, maybe around 4 years? It's hard to say whether this cutoff is to drive sales of new Macs, or for other reasons, like performance concerns, to reduce their compatibility testing or other support costs… or some combination thereof. I suppose it's hard for Apple to justify the cost of officially supporting older Macs while the number of users upgrading to Lion on those old machines rapidly declines. While original owners will most likely want to upgrade, a lot of older machines get sold to people less concerned about having the latest and greatest. I doubt Apple cares if users jury-rig Lion to run on unsupported systems, so long as it doesn't increase their support costs.

I've seen this before. Thanks to XpostFacto, i was able to install and run Panther on a Wallstreet PowerBook, even though Apple dropped support for it when Tiger came out, IIRC. But each generation of Mac OS X that i installed on that old Wallstreet performed better than the previous, XpostFacto notwithstanding.

     
   
 
Forum Links
Forum Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Top
Privacy Policy
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:06 AM.
All contents of these forums © 1995-2017 MacNN. All rights reserved.
Branding + Design: www.gesamtbild.com
vBulletin v.3.8.8 © 2000-2017, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.,