|
|
Bill Gates inspires me more than Steve Jobs
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Tampa, Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
(
Last edited by The Godfather; Apr 15, 2012 at 03:31 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
I don't have time to watch those, did they release those GM mosquitos that will self eradicate or are these new ones that just don't carry Malaria?
|
I have plenty of more important things to do, if only I could bring myself to do them....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Netherlands
Status:
Offline
|
|
I agree totally, Jobs killed all philanthropic projects at Apple after his return. It's an awfully corporate organization ever since.
Gates, on the other hand, has shown his best after gaining incredible richness. i truly admire him !
|
{Animated sigs are not allowed.}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: 46 & 2
Status:
Offline
|
|
Jobs was a better businessman, Gates is a better person. No big surprise there. I wonder if Steve will pull a Marley on Cook in 9 years.
|
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
- Thomas Paine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Woz should play The Ghost of Christmas Present.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Jul 2000
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
steve jobs is gone... you'd have to wonder if he was around to retire if he'd be just as philanthropic as bill gates. no one will ever know.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 1999
Location: Montréal, Québec (Canada)
Status:
Offline
|
|
Bill Gates a better person? People seem to forget how he was before he retired.. The way he practically "stole" DOS, the way he ripped the company he bought IE from "sure you'll get royalties.. we only forgot to tell you we were giving it for free, thus you get nothing!", the whole "either you join us or I'll employ hundreds of programmers to destroy your company" attitude.. The whole antitrust case. etc etc etc.
It's easy to donate money you acquired while being a villain... it doesn't erase what you did!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Arizona
Status:
Offline
|
|
Eh... I think 21st century Apple has been more villainous than Gates' Microsoft ever was. They've just gone under the radar until recently because they weren't omni-dominant.
|
I like chicken
I like liver
Meow Mix, Meow Mix
Please de-liv-er
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: 46 & 2
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Lateralus
Eh... I think 21st century Apple has been more villainous than Gates' Microsoft ever was. They've just gone under the radar until recently because they weren't omni-dominant.
This. Also, I can't see Steve being the full-time philanthropist, he didn't have the heart or conscience for it. Not to say that he was "evil", just driven to complete obsession.
|
"Those who expect to reap the blessings of freedom must, like men, undergo the fatigue of supporting it."
- Thomas Paine
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Apple have been ruthless in business in the 21st centruy but they haven't resorted to the sort depths M$ did.
|
I have plenty of more important things to do, if only I could bring myself to do them....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Great White North
Status:
Offline
|
|
Was a great presentation.
|
Blandine Bureau 1940 - 2011
Missed 2012 by 3 days, RIP Grandma :-(
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: 888500128, C3, 2nd soft.
Status:
Online
|
|
Originally Posted by Camali
steve jobs is gone... you'd have to wonder if he was around to retire if he'd be just as philanthropic as bill gates. no one will ever know.
We also have no idea what he did while he was still alive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Back in the Good Ole US of A
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Spheric Harlot
We also have no idea what he did while he was still alive.
We do know what was mentioned in his biography (no significant mention of any charitable activity) and I can't think of any reason why Jobs would hide his charity if it existed. He was completely uninterested in his wife's charity work. I suspect it wasn't very high on his list of priorities. He was most concerned about his legacy in building Apple (and "amazing" products).
Who knows, maybe his wife will announce some major personal donations and claim it was all Steve's idea before he died. She stuck around his crazy ass a long time, she may want to build him up as a way to justify her commitment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Truckee, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by FireWire
Bill Gates a better person? People seem to forget how he was before he retired.
It's easy to donate money you acquired while being a villain... it doesn't erase what you did!
Exactly (emphasis mine). Gates was just a mean, entitled dealmaker, almost zero innovation. His unethical and often illegal dominance held back many real innovators. For a long while every real innovator with a tech idea was in constant fear of what MS would do: Steal it? Buy it for half value? Kill it with back-room deals that cut off potential buyers/partners/investors/etc.? Kill off your biz by bundling a competing app "free" with the DOS that Gates bought and IBM made dominant?
Bill Gates was a very, very unethical guy. There is a reason MS lost all the way to including the Supreme Court and the EEU. Then of course after $$$ contributions the Bush administration essentially let MS off. Bill Gates business as usual.
MS is dying not because Gates left but because the Gates Model of dominate/deal/steal/abuse no longer works for MS, because the US and EEU investigations brought his unethical and/or illegal practices out in the open, and the business practices of Bill Gates do poorly in the daylight.
(
Last edited by SierraDragon; Apr 18, 2012 at 03:18 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
That's bull. Gates and MS were huge innovators, but they also kept things going by taking other people's ideas on many occasions too. Much like Apple has done several times over.
Apple has arguably innovated more, but that's a different argument.
---
Meanwhile...
Video: Bill Gates to become comic book hero - The Globe and Mail
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Truckee, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I was not talking about simply using others' ideas. The Gates business model was about using back-room deals, money and market dominance to stifle or buy out the innovative efforts of smaller firms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Status:
Offline
|
|
Gates abandoned the business world for the charity world because he had nothing left to contribute. He spent his last years at Microsoft wallowing in complete failure: tablets, WinCE phones, smothered in malware, etc.
Giving away your billions doesn't require any skill. I respect his philanthropy, but the fact is, business requires actual skills, but charity is just a choice anyone could make.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Lateralus
Eh... I think 21st century Apple has been more villainous than Gates' Microsoft ever was.
You should start a thread on that. I wold love to hear you someone try to support that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by SierraDragon
I was not talking about simply using others' ideas. The Gates business model was about using back-room deals, money and market dominance to stifle or buy out the innovative efforts of smaller firms.
And lets not forget that BG got where he did because he was in the right place at the right time and other people (namely IBM, Sculley and arguably Xerox Parc) made some very poor decisions, not because he was especially brilliant.
You might argue that Jobs got a similar break off the back of Woz and his engineering talents but I think business-wise its obvious which of the two was more easily replaceable. Has been for decades now.
|
I have plenty of more important things to do, if only I could bring myself to do them....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: Caught in a web of deceit.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Waragainstsleep
And lets not forget that BG got where he did because he was in the right place at the right time and other people (namely IBM, Sculley and arguably Xerox Parc) made some very poor decisions, not because he was especially brilliant.
That's a very poor argument.
It's extremely rare that someone just lucks into this and develops it in to a multi-billion dollar company. In fact, one might argue it has never happened. Gates was in the right place at the right time, AND he was brilliant. He understood the engineering issues around all of this, but saw way past it and how it would change the world. He had no understanding of aesthetics, but luckily for him, at the time that was not necessary.
You might argue that Jobs got a similar break off the back of Woz and his engineering talents but I think business-wise its obvious which of the two was more easily replaceable. Has been for decades now.
Without Jobs, Apple wouldn't exist. However, without Woz, Apple wouldn't exist. Basically all of Apple's early successes were due to Woz's engineering genius.
P.S. I've known people who used to work up in the upper echelons of MS, grunt MS coders, and MS team leaders. They said that Gates knew exactly what he was doing. He could cut through all the bull in seconds, to point the company managers etc. in the right direction.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Arizona
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by lpkmckenna
You should start a thread on that. I wold love to hear you someone try to support that.
Nah, I'm cool. The fervor around here is a bit too strong for a well informed, level headed discussion/confession/confrontation session.
|
I like chicken
I like liver
Meow Mix, Meow Mix
Please de-liv-er
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: FFM
Status:
Offline
|
|
Once you have an insane amount of money, donating it to charity is a very noble act. But I don't see how that is "inspiring". I see it as easy. Not having a lot of money and donating your time and effort to charity is inspiring to me.
As for how Gates and Jobs got to their insane amount of money, I find Jobs to be much more inspiring.
So for me Gates may well be the more noble person of the two, but Jobs is the more inspiring to me.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Dec 1999
Location: Tampa, Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
Sir Bill Gates, Knight, to you, sir.
There's charity that makes you dependent like free money and food*, and there's charity that makes you stronger and more independent, like schools (Oprah), health and energy (Bill).
However, there's also the positive market effect that Jobs created in the App system. Thousands employed all over the globe, people who could have gotten a less creative job.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|