|
|
Fat chick tries out for Miss England (Page 3)
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Laminar
Great genes.
My diagnosis, kick your dad in the balls and curse the heavens.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by sek929
My diagnosis, kick your dad in the balls and curse the heavens.
Or, if you wish to maintain some kind of working relationship with your father, do it the other way around.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Nov 1999
Location: Cape Cod, MA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Heavens a curse and balls your dad in the kick?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by sek929
Heavens a curse and balls your dad in the kick?
Exactly.
Or, if you’re a cop-out, just curse your dad and kick the heavens in the balls (assuming you can find them).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
person man, I have had so much problem with the two dimensional metric of "healthy weight" through my life and military career that it is a very sore spot for me. Likewise, "standard" metrics about how fast a person's heart rate should rise for a given amount of exertion failed to accurately measure me-I "activate" very quickly, but only to a set level (I go to about 125-130 at the beginning and stay there), so the Air Force's "bike test" ("thoroughly tested" on about 500 people who were all virtually identical pilot candidates) failed me no matter what I did. When a human overrode the software and saw that I wasn't going to keel over, I passed with flying colors.
So I'm sorry if I sounded like I was laying into you. I was NOT. I was railing about BMI and the OTHER people who mentioned it after your post. It's a ballpark figure at best, and unfortunately there isn't anything better available right now that is both straightforward and easy to explain.
|
Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: The midwest...
Status:
Offline
|
|
Off topic, but I failed the bike test twice! Then magically passed it two weeks later....
|
Joe
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: England | San Francisco
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
we don't have time to stop for gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by powerbook867
Off topic, but I failed the bike test twice! Then magically passed it two weeks later....
Any software that uses magic numbers to calculate anything is suspect. THAT software was HIGHLY suspect-as was the "people were 'gutting it out' and then keeling over" cover story for adopting that test. I think it was because they spent all that money developing the darn thing (with, as I said, a small and very uniform population of test subjects) so they HAD to field it. The earlier, 1.5 mile run test, by the way, was developed by Dr. Cooper. THAT Dr. Cooper. Tens of thousands of extremely heterogeneous test subjects in basic training, a brilliant physiologist, and real science made that a valid test.
When they implemented the newer "run, weigh, tape" test, at least I got to see some sanity and validity return to fitness testing before I retired.</rant>
|
Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
45/47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Chongo
It's late and the pub is closing. You've had a pint or so of Guinness.
This begs the question: Why did you go to the pub ten minutes before closing time?
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: San Antonio TX USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
She's not "un-pretty." It's just that she doesn't seem to be "beauty pageant" material. She's not just "round," she's overweight. Photogenic, sure. But not pageant material.
So now many of us are thinking "Is she the best looking bird in Surrey?" How did that happen?
|
Glenn -----OTR/L, MOT, Tx
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Well, at least Doofy wouldn't complain about her small boobs
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by turtle777
Well, at least Doofy wouldn't complain about her small boobs
Yep, kinda hard to worry about boob size when you're nursing a crushed pelvis.
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Monique
Sorry she is not fat. What do you guys look like. Real beauties like Tom Cruise or just ordinary with some fat at your mid section.
She's ****ing enormous. Seriously.
Originally Posted by sek929
Monroe still is hot as hell, I know Cipher disagrees but I'd take that down in a heartbeat.
There is a huge (pun intended) difference between her and the chick Doofy posted.
Even in that second picture? In the first she's too chunky for me, but I can see how other guys might find it appealing (though I wouldn't touch her with a barge pole) - but in the second she's just *huge*.
Nasty.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Laminar
So you're saying at 6'5" and 185 pounds I'm a bit...light?
Not necessarily. Looking at the pic, you seem to be small-framed compared to me. So, dare I say it, you look... (wait for it) ... fine.
I don't have a full body shot of me losing a volleyball game, so I can't post one to compare with yours.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northwest Ohio
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Cipher13
She's ****ing enormous. Seriously.
Even in that second picture? In the first she's too chunky for me, but I can see how other guys might find it appealing (though I wouldn't touch her with a barge pole) - but in the second she's just *huge*
Oh come on. Yes, she's big, but she's not *that* big. As I said before, if you want big, click on the spoiler tag in my first post to this thread. Now THAT'S huge.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Person Man
Oh come on. Yes, she's big, but she's not *that* big.
That's like saying "Paris Hilton is skanky, but not that skanky".
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northwest Ohio
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
That's like saying "Paris Hilton is skanky, but not that skanky".
Actually, in the case of Paris Hilton, she really is that skanky.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: England | San Francisco
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
we don't have time to stop for gas
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Peter
latest on the fat chick tries to be trendy debacle:
a couple of them look like they are smoking their food
|
45/47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Baltimore
Status:
Offline
|
|
Personally, I'm all for full-figured brits (two words: Nigella Lawson)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: detroit,mi,usa
Status:
Offline
|
|
That's a sorta unflattering picture of her (and I don't know that I would call her full figured), here:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Copenhagen
Status:
Offline
|
|
(and I don't know that I would call her full figured)
Have you seen her recently?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: detroit,mi,usa
Status:
Offline
|
|
Oh. Maybe not. Carry on, thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|