|
|
Climate change isn't man-made? (Page 5)
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Snow-i
The world is still here....funny I thought for sure we'd all be dead by now.
I thought Jesus was supposed to return to Earth by now?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Maryland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by besson3c
I thought Jesus was supposed to return to Earth by now?
I think we'd all be dead in that case too.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status:
Offline
|
|
Global warming: if it real why aren't we dead yet?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Maryland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by The Final Dakar
Global warming: if it real why aren't we dead yet?
I thought it was "climate change" not "global warming"?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Snow-i
I thought it was "climate change" not "global warming"?
Is there a difference?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2012
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by The Final Dakar
Global warming: if it real why aren't we dead yet?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Maryland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by The Final Dakar
Is there a difference?
I would imagine so, otherwise the concept wouldn't have been rebranded. Right?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Maryland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by The Final Shortcut
Do i need to start using /s here? I thought we were above that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2012
Status:
Offline
|
|
Do i need to start using /s here? I thought we were above that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Maryland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by The Final Shortcut
Do i need to start using /s here? I thought we were above that.
Touche.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2012
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Snow-i
I would imagine so, otherwise the concept wouldn't have been rebranded. Right?
No, I wouldn't agree with that. People often use terms interchangeably.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Shaddim's sock drawer
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Snow-i
I would imagine so, otherwise the concept wouldn't have been rebranded. Right?
|
"I have a dream, that my four little children will one day live in a
nation where they will not be judged by the color of their skin,
but by the content of their character." - M.L.King Jr
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2012
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by The Final Dakar
No, I wouldn't agree with that. People often use terms interchangeably.
The answer is of course that it's both. It's global warming, and it's climate change. They can be used interchangeably, but strictly speaking are referring to two separate but closely related events.
Of course, people try to use one or the other to be very specific - mostly because, of course, Certain People screamed bloody murder that "warming" was a lie because it had been really cold outside for the last month.
Yes, those are the same people now complaining about the use of the two terms, of course. But I think we've figured that out by now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Maryland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by The Final Shortcut
The answer is of course that it's both. It's global warming, and it's climate change. They can be used interchangeably, but strictly speaking are referring to two separate but closely related events.
Interchangeably? Logically global warming would always be climate change, but climate change wouldn't necessarily global warming. Always fun to argue semantics, even just for a little
Of course, people try to use one or the other to be very specific - mostly because, of course, Certain People screamed bloody murder that "warming" was a lie because it had been really cold outside for the last month.
Idiots will be idiots, Global Warming is a form of Climate Change, and water is wet.
Yes, those are the same people now complaining about the use of the two terms, of course. But I think we've figured that out by now.
Surely you think more of me?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2012
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Snow-i
Interchangeably? Logically global warming would always be climate change, but climate change wouldn't necessarily global warming.
They can only be used interchangeably because climate change, at this time, does mean global warming.
It's still not "re-branding".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Games Meister
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Eternity
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Snow-i
Interchangeably? Logically global warming would always be climate change, but climate change wouldn't necessarily global warming.
https://www.theguardian.com/environm....climatechange
The memo, by the leading Republican consultant Frank Luntz, concedes the party has "lost the environmental communications battle" and urges its politicians to encourage the public in the view that there is no scientific consensus on the dangers of greenhouse gases
...
The phrase "global warming" should be abandoned in favour of "climate change", Mr Luntz says, and the party should describe its policies as "conservationist" instead of "environmentalist", because "most people" think environmentalists are "extremists" who indulge in "some pretty bizarre behaviour... that turns off many voters".
I don't think you're aware of who did the rebranding.
Originally Posted by Snow-i
Always fun to argue semantics, even just for a little
A little? I feel a good chunk of your posts is ripping apart phrasing and terms rather than the points being made.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Maryland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by The Final Dakar
It doesn't really matter to me either way.
A little? I feel a good chunk of your posts is ripping apart phrasing and terms rather than the points being made.
Originally Posted by Snow-i
Surely you think more of me?
I guess not.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Just west of DC.
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2012
Status:
Offline
|
|
Back to talking about Gore....what next, telling us that warming stopped 15 years ago? Or have the septic blogs finally quietly moved on from that argument?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: yes
Status:
Offline
|
|
I wonder how responsible Gore was for tying this issue to politics. I think some right-wingers have turned their noses up against the science because they don't like Gore, and have never looked back. Such is politics, I guess.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|