|
|
Barry didn't even NEED the black vote....
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
I got sick of people at work "blaming" the blacks for "causing him to get elected" so I did some quick math....
OBAMA - 63,110,763 Votes
12% of his votes were from Blacks = 7,242,871
THAT LEAVES = 55,867,892 NON-BLACKS
McCAIN - 55,862,654 Votes
5% of his votes were from Blacks = 2,793,132
THAT LEAVES = 53,069,522 NON-BLACKS
OBAMA still wins by 2,798,370 NON-BLACK VOTERS
*Current totals as of 10/5/2008 12:50pm
Is my thinking way off or can I post this into a reply all? haha thanks!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Rockville, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
Popular vote is pretty irrelevant. You'd have to do it state by state.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Your Anus
Status:
Offline
|
|
Why do we let those blacks vote anyway? Who's bright idea was that?
|
My sig is 1 pixel too big.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Uncle Skeleton
Popular vote is pretty irrelevant. You'd have to do it state by state.
I understand that, just illustrating that its not even a significant amount, breaking it down by state would be even stronger as some states would be much higher and some very blue states MUCH lower.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by ort888
Why do we let those blacks vote anyway? Who's bright idea was that?
And Gays too
I would normally not reply to these freaks, but blaming a small segment of the population for a clear choice OF THE PEOPLE gets me steamed up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Our forefathers would turn in their graves if they knew blacks can now vote.
|
Bush Tax Cuts == Job Killer
June 2001: 132,047,000 employed
June 2003: 129,839,000 employed
2.21 million jobs were LOST after 2 years of Bush Tax Cuts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by hyteckit
Our forefathers would turn in their graves if they knew blacks can now vote.
You forgot women.
|
45/47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by zerostar
I got sick of people at work "blaming" the blacks for "causing him to get elected" so I did some quick math....
OBAMA - 63,110,763 Votes
12% of his votes were from Blacks = 7,242,871
THAT LEAVES = 55,867,892 NON-BLACKS
McCAIN - 55,862,654 Votes
5% of his votes were from Blacks = 2,793,132
THAT LEAVES = 53,069,522 NON-BLACKS
OBAMA still wins by 2,798,370 NON-BLACK VOTERS
*Current totals as of 10/5/2008 12:50pm
Is my thinking way off or can I post this into a reply all? haha thanks!
That's why Jesse and Al will soon be out of a job. On second thought they will spend the next four years pushing for reparations.
|
45/47
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa, how long can this be? Does it really ruin the left column spacing?
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by zerostar
I got sick of people at work "blaming" the blacks for "causing him to get elected" so I did some quick math....
OBAMA - 63,110,763 Votes
12% of his votes were from Blacks = 7,242,871
THAT LEAVES = 55,867,892 NON-BLACKS
McCAIN - 55,862,654 Votes
5% of his votes were from Blacks = 2,793,132
THAT LEAVES = 53,069,522 NON-BLACKS
OBAMA still wins by 2,798,370 NON-BLACK VOTERS
*Current totals as of 10/5/2008 12:50pm
Is my thinking way off or can I post this into a reply all? haha thanks!
Your situation assumes black people just didn't vote. What if you assume a few million of those people would have voted for McCain, but voted for Obama just because he was black? That could have turned everything around.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: Sep 2008
Status:
Offline
|
|
You can blame "nonwhites" for electing Obama.
John Kerry won 41 percent of the (non-Hispanic — assume “white” = “non-Hispanic white” throughout this discussion) white vote, and Barack Obama improved to 43 percent of the white vote. But the white vote declined from 77 percent of the electorate to 74 percent of the electorate. As a result, 31.57 percent of voters were white people who voted for John Kerry in 2004. In 2008, the tally was very similar — 31.82 percent of voters were white people who voted for Barack Obama.
The big difference is that Obama increased the share of the black vote from 11 percent to 13 percent, increased the share of the “other” vote from 2 percent to 3 percent, grew his share of the black vote by seven percentage points, grew his share of the Hispanic vote by 13 (!) percentage points, grew his share of the Asian vote by five percentage points, and grew his share of the “other” vote by 11 percentage points. Consequently, while just 16.12 percent of 2004 voters were non-white for Kerry, fully 20.15 percent of 2008 voters were non-white for Obama. That 4.03 percentage point increase was the difference maker. McCain, despite the collapse in GOP party identification, despite Bush’s unpopularity, despite the economic crisis, held his own among white people. But he got slaughtered by a much bigger margin among non-whites, and his white base shrunk.
Thank god.
|
Crooked Member of the MacNN Atheist Clique.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Laminar
Your situation assumes black people just didn't vote. What if you assume a few million of those people would have voted for McCain, but voted for Obama just because he was black? That could have turned everything around.
Wouldn't you also then have to account for those who voted for McCain because he's white?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by CreepDogg
Wouldn't you also then have to account for those who voted for McCain because he's white?
Yes, you'd have to include just the opposite and that would still put Obama in the lead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by zerostar
Yes, you'd have to include just the opposite and that would still put Obama in the lead.
Well, we don't know that, and there's really no way of knowing for sure - especially state-by-state. My point was that we don't, and can't, know. It's not cut and dried either way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Anyone who thinks that a person can be elected to the Presidency of the United States on the strength of the black vote alone is a mathematical idiot. Simple as that.
The fact of the matter is that Obama expanded the electorate and put together a winning coalition composed of a variety of demographics that crossed ethnic, gender, and age classifications. Anyone who can't see that is just woefully, and perhaps willfully, ignorant.
OAW
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Across from the wallpaper store.
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm glad to see that now racism is officially dead.
|
Being in debt and celebrating a lower deficit is like being on a diet and celebrating the fact you gained two pounds this week instead of five.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Interesting, yet not surprising. Ageism has roots in genuine medical concerns, while racism is based on irrational fears.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Emeritus
Join Date: Apr 2001
Location: Up In The Air
Status:
Offline
|
|
I wonder how much sexism was a factor as well.
After all, we saw Hillary Clinton find the glass ceiling in the Democrat primary, and we saw how Democrats treated Sarah Palin (It's a Girl - salon.com, caribou barbie, etc.) - perhaps sexism is a bigger problem than racism among Democrats?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by smacintush
I'm glad to see that now racism is officially dead.
But did it kill reverse-racism, too
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by vmarks
After all, we saw Hillary Clinton find the glass ceiling in the Democrat primary
No. We saw her get beat by a better candidate. That seems to have worked out OK for the Democrats.
and we saw how Democrats treated Sarah Palin (It's a Girl - salon.com, caribou barbie, etc.) - perhaps sexism is a bigger problem than racism among Democrats?
Uh huh - and there were no mocking names for Obama based on some real or imagined characteristic? Do we have to pull out besson's list? Whether you agree or not, many people saw Palin as unqualified - not because she's female, but because she lacks the intellect and judgement they expect in a president. That's not sexism. Sexism is claiming she's unqualified because she's a woman.
Not to mention, many people also thought that the Republicans chose Palin because they thought she would bring them the votes of the women who voted for Hillary, simply because Palin is a woman. If true, that's sexist pandering on the Republicans' part. Perhaps conservatives aren't ready for a woman to gain office on her own merit?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by vmarks
I wonder how much sexism was a factor as well.
After all, we saw Hillary Clinton find the glass ceiling in the Democrat primary, and we saw how Democrats treated Sarah Palin (It's a Girl - salon.com, caribou barbie, etc.) - perhaps sexism is a bigger problem than racism among Democrats?
Hilary got beaten by a better candidate, and Palin got beat down on her own incompetence and extremism rather than her sex.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Berkshire, UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
I was not a supporter of either Hillary or Palin, but to say there was not at least an undercurrent of sexism in play in these contests is naive. Of course, we had subtle racism and overt ageism in play as well.
God Bless America.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: München, Deutschland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Chongo
You forgot women.
"Do you remember a time when women couldn't vote and certain folk weren't allowed on golf courses? Petridge Farm remembers."
|
Aut Caesar aut nihil.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|