 |
 |
Cyberduck
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: here
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator  Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Nobletucky
Status:
Offline
|
|
Fetch: Long-long-time Mac developer. Must purchase after trial period. Only $29.
Cyberduck: The new-ish kid. Donationware.
Beyond that, it's really just a question of which workflow feels better to you, since they both do the same thing. Both of them have issues with uploading to one of my clients' Network Solutions server, but I think that's an issue with NS, not Fetch or Cyberduck.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Down by the river
Status:
Offline
|
|
Cyberduck's been around for a long time, maybe "new-ish" relative to Fetch but it's very mature. I use Forklift 2 and Flow (both new and very good) but still resort to Cyberduck from time to time as it's bulletproof. I think Cyberduck's been released for Windows recently which is great seeing as I couldn't find a decent (free) Windows FTP program (and FileZilla is an ugle POS).
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Dec 2000
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Switched from Fetch over to Cyberduck at work, I prefer it. They both do the same basic things though.
|
It'll be much easier if you just comply.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Vancouver, BC
Status:
Offline
|
|
I've been using Cyberduck for the last few years. It just works - I've never had an issue and the layout is nice and intuitive.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Land of Enchantment
Status:
Offline
|
|
I've used both, Cyberduck first, 'cause free, then it stopped working for me, switched to Fetch, still works fine. If you have Fetch, why switch? They both are the same thing with slightly different GUIs. Maybe, as dog nut, I'm biased to see the dog running...
So try CD, free download and see what feels best.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: here
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by cgc 
Cyberduck's been around for a long time, maybe "new-ish" relative to Fetch but it's very mature. I use Forklift 2 and Flow (both new and very good) but still resort to Cyberduck from time to time as it's bulletproof. I think Cyberduck's been released for Windows recently which is great seeing as I couldn't find a decent (free) Windows FTP program (and FileZilla is an ugle POS).
Would you say Forklift and/or Flow are better than Cyberduck?
I haven't tried any of these three and only used Fetch so far, but I'm interested what else is out there.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Down by the river
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Veltliner
Would you say Forklift and/or Flow are better than Cyberduck?
I haven't tried any of these three and only used Fetch so far, but I'm interested what else is out there.
I bought Forklift 1, Forklift 2, and Flow 1 and at this point in time would recommend Transmit 4 over all others. Very mature/robust, very fast, and very pretty but without the quirks of Forklift or Flow.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fresh-Faced Recruit
Join Date: Jun 2011
Status:
Offline
|
|
I didn't much like Cyberduck. I found FileZilla was the easiest FTP client of those I have tried. I manage five sites using it and haven't experienced any problems with it. If you know how to use a file manager you know how to use FileZilla.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: inside 128, north of 90
Status:
Offline
|
|
At some point I started using Fugu instead of fetch or cyberduck. It's friendly.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top