|
|
passing mac addict4life
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
as they are the closest at only 700points ahead of us i thought we needed someting to motvate others to join us so we can pass them
but does anyone have any ideas about this and ow long it would take
|
MacbookPro dual 2Ghz 1GB Ram 128 Graphics
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Oviedo, Floriduh USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
folding@home is good for you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Status:
Offline
|
|
ok well we should tru to recruit to pass them
on another note i downloaded your progress script but its sayin that im missing a .arc file that is essential to folding?? help
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Oviedo, Floriduh USA
Status:
Offline
|
|
That's just saying that the protein has not reached a checkpoint. Once it gets there, it can chart the progress.
|
folding@home is good for you.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Mile High City
Status:
Offline
|
|
This page, http://teamstats.macnn.com/fold/rank1.phtml will show you where we stand in relationship to the closest teams in Folding@Home and approximately how long it will take to pass them (if possible) at the current rate.
According to that page it will take about 72 days to pass MacAddict4Life at current production.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Silly Valley, Ca
Status:
Offline
|
|
It is sad we can't just have a TeamMac
Code:
24 Macrumors 971,580 7,170.3
31 Team MacOS X 762,985 4,080.9
36 MacAddict4Life 612,424 2,300.8
44 Team MacNN 543,512 3,266.7
----------------------------------
13 TeamMac 2890501 16818.7
That would be pretty cool, get lots of attention, and we would have a shot at the top 10.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: Minneapolis, MN
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by mikkyo:
It is sad we can't just have a TeamMac
Code:
24 Macrumors 971,580 7,170.3
31 Team MacOS X 762,985 4,080.9
36 MacAddict4Life 612,424 2,300.8
44 Team MacNN 543,512 3,266.7
----------------------------------
13 TeamMac 2890501 16818.7
That would be pretty cool, get lots of attention, and we would have a shot at the top 10.
Agreed.
|
Crunch Something
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Aug 2002
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally posted by mikkyo:
It is sad we can't just have a TeamMac
Code:
24 Macrumors 971,580 7,170.3
31 Team MacOS X 762,985 4,080.9
36 MacAddict4Life 612,424 2,300.8
44 Team MacNN 543,512 3,266.7
----------------------------------
13 TeamMac 2890501 16818.7
That would be pretty cool, get lots of attention, and we would have a shot at the top 10.
Nice post @ MacAddict. If the interteam stats can be realized (if anyone can do it Reader50 can ) than I would be for joining UberMac
I know this has been discussed before but it never seems to get anywhere.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: 42 minutes from the other side of the world
Status:
Offline
|
|
For it to work, I think some agreement has to be made among the leaders, unofficial or otherwise, of the various teams before a new team is made and people start switching over.
That said, I guess its out of my hands. (If I were to create an UberMac team, it would just be another mac team, see)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|