|
|
1 in 5 Americans believe the Sun revolves around the Earth
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
1 in 5 Americans believe Sun revolves around the Earth
"American adults in general do not understand what molecules are (other than that they are really small). Fewer than a third can identify DNA as a key to heredity. Only about 10 percent know what radiation is. One adult American in five thinks the Sun revolves around the Earth, an idea science had abandoned by the 17th century." Said Jon D. Miller, a political scientists who directs the Center for Biomedical Communications at the Northwestern University Medical School in Chicago, he regularly surveys Americans for his clients which include the National Science Foundation on the public’s knowledge and attitudes towards science in general.
I mean, lets be honest, if you don’t know what a ****ing cell is how can you understand what stem cell research is enough to vote on it?
And according to this guy most Americans don’t know what a cell is.
Clearly, there is something wrong with our education system. We need to look at issues beyond public vs. private and how well students perform on standardized tests. The problems go far deeper than that, and we need to figure out why. What we need, is a way that we can encourage students to actually want to learn.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: A House of Ill-Repute in the Sky
Status:
Offline
|
|
No wonder I'm a pessimist. Makes me think of Einstein: "Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
I would like to see what this test looked like. Multiple choice? True/False? No answers given at all?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Back in the Good Ole US of A
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by nonhuman
1 in 5 Americans believe Sun revolves around the Earth
Clearly, there is something wrong with our education system. We need to look at issues beyond public vs. private and how well students perform on standardized tests. The problems go far deeper than that, and we need to figure out why. What we need, is a way that we can encourage students to actually want to learn.
As long as the 1 in 5 doesn't vote, I'm fine with it. You can't fix everything. There are idiots everywhere you go. Contrary to what many would like to believe, some humans are inferior to others.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
The Sun actually *does* revolve around the Earth.
Anyone who doesn't think so needs an IQ boost and a lesson in spatial relationships.
Think about it. Then get back to me.
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
The Sun actually *does* revolve around the Earth.
Anyone who doesn't think so needs an IQ boost and a lesson in spatial relationships.
Think about it. Then get back to me.
Actually the Sun and the Earth both revolve around a point somewhere between the two. The Sun being vastly more massive than the Earth that point is much much closer to the Sun than it is to the Earth. The difference in mass may even be so great that the point about which the both orbit is within the Sun itself, in which case it would be entirely accurate to say that the Earth revolves around the Sun while the Sun merely wobbles a bit in its orbit.
Of course this relationship is significantly complicated by the gravitational interactions of other bodies in the solar system.
Unless you're talking about The Sun. Or, I suppose, if you're referring to frames of reference...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: A House of Ill-Repute in the Sky
Status:
Offline
|
|
It'll be some lame hairsplitting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by nonhuman
Or, I suppose, if you're referring to frames of reference...
Of course. It all depends on what you take as the static point in the Universe.
If I take it to be, say, me then when I get in the Doofmobile to go to the pub then the Earth is revolving around me. As is the Sun. And all the honeys at the pub.
It's all relative to whatever point you take to be the fixed, static axis.
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
It's all relative to whatever point you take to be the fixed, static axis.
...which most certainly isn't Dakara's brain.
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: A House of Ill-Repute in the Sky
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
Of course. It all depends on what you take as the static point in the Universe.
If I take it to be, say, me then when I get in the Doofmobile to go to the pub then the Earth is revolving around me. As is the Sun. And all the honeys at the pub.
It's all relative to whatever point you take to be the fixed, static axis.
I'm sure that's what the people who got it wrong were taught in school.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: A House of Ill-Repute in the Sky
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
...which most certainly isn't Dakara's brain.
Wow, by brain isn't static and fixed. So burned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
Of course. It all depends on what you take as the static point in the Universe.
If I take it to be, say, me then when I get in the Doofmobile to go to the pub then the Earth is revolving around me. As is the Sun. And all the honeys at the pub.
It's all relative to whatever point you take to be the fixed, static axis.
Ok then smartypants, explain to me the retrograde motion of Mars.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Dakarʒ
I'm sure that's what the people who got it wrong were taught in school.
Really, go grab an orrery, wind it up and hold it (static, fixed point) by the Earth. Does the Sun revolve around the Earth? Yes.
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: München, Deutschland
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Atheist
As long as the 1 in 5 doesn't vote, I'm fine with it. You can't fix everything. There are idiots everywhere you go. Contrary to what many would like to believe, some humans are inferior to others.
Don't count on it. In fact I'd figure those 1 in 5 are jointly responsible for "mighty-patriotic-hurray-politics" that waste thousands of lifes in "Iwaq", instead of pursuing a _consistent_ way.
PB.
|
Aut Caesar aut nihil.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
Really, go grab an orrery, wind it up and hold it (static, fixed point) by the Earth. Does the Sun revolve around the Earth? Yes.
I think that in most cases the Earth will just break off and go flying out into deep space while the rest of the solar system continues to orbit along it merry way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by nonhuman
Ok then smartypants, explain to me the retrograde motion of Mars.
I can't be bothered to explain retrograde motions in relationship to this (meaning: I'm listening to Manowar and have Ted the wolverine cat on my knee ripping my skin off). But suffice it to say that Mars also revolves around the Doof's manhood in the Earth is the axis model, eventually. Even Ted knows this... ...or he wouldn't be sitting so close to the axis in order to prevent motion sickness.
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Dakarʒ
Wow, by brain isn't static and fixed. So burned.
Touché.
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: A House of Ill-Repute in the Sky
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
Really, go grab an orrery, wind it up and hold it (static, fixed point) by the Earth. Does the Sun revolve around the Earth? Yes.
Once again, I'm sure that's what the people who got it wrong were taught in school...
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Dakarʒ
Once again, I'm sure that's what the people who got it wrong were taught in school...
Once again, no.
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: I don't know anymore!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Powerbook
Don't count on it. In fact I'd figure those 1 in 5 are jointly responsible for "mighty-patriotic-hurray-politics" that waste thousands of lifes in "Iwaq", instead of pursuing a _consistent_ way.
PB.
I'd have to agree with Atheist on this one. These are the people who stumble through life, one paycheck away from disaster, even though they can always find $5 for a pack of cigarettes, and who are no doubt most likely to be high school dropouts, or those who barely made it through. This is the National Enquirer/Jerry Springer crowd.
|
Why is there always money for war, but none for education?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: A House of Ill-Repute in the Sky
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
Once again, no.
Exactly! They weren't taught that in school, they were taught the earth revolves around the sun.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Dakarʒ
Exactly! They weren't taught that in school, they were taught the earth revolves around the sun.
No, you've lost me there ducks. I'm having an attack of the Friday afternoons.
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: A House of Ill-Repute in the Sky
Status:
Offline
|
|
Your point: The sun revolves around the sun from a certain perspective
My point: That's not what the people who were surveyed were taught, so they're still wrong, regardless of what you think of the answer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Vacation.
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Dakarʒ
Your point: The sun revolves around the sun from a certain perspective
My point: That's not what the people who were surveyed were taught, so they're still wrong, regardless of what you think of the answer.
Get ya. Yep. Concur.
|
Been inclined to wander... off the beaten track.
That's where there's thunder... and the wind shouts back.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Toronto
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by nonhuman
Clearly, there is something wrong with our education system.
Education only cures ignorance. Nothing can cure stupidity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: A House of Ill-Repute in the Sky
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by lpkmckenna
Education only cures ignorance. Nothing can cure stupidity.
Obviously you've neglected to consider death.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: South of the Mason-Dixon line
Status:
Offline
|
|
Aw, screw it. Let's all ride to the pub in the Doofy-mobile.
I call dibs on the redheaded chicks
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
I'm a conservative (i.e., think people are basically good, unlike those slimey liberals). Therefore, I tend to take these surveys with a grain of salt. Obviously the people taking the survey are just playing around; they don't seriously think the sun revolves around the earth.
|
The 4 o'clock train will be a bus.
It will depart at 20 minutes to 5.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: South of the Mason-Dixon line
Status:
Offline
|
|
wtf? have I been away from here that long?
*you* are a conservative?
say it isn't so.
Geez. That's no different than me thinking about saving whales and reducing my carbon footprint.
I'm counting on both you and besson3c to argue against me.
If that doesn't happen, my life is meaningless.
wait a minute. Listen
Hear that?
That's the sound of a fuel-injected V12 XJS. I'm gonna let it idle until you convert back to the liberal ideology.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: South of the Mason-Dixon line
Status:
Offline
|
|
....probably killed half a dozen polar bears by now.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: South of the Mason-Dixon line
Status:
Offline
|
|
hurry up, dammit. Only got a quarter tank of gas.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: South of the Mason-Dixon line
Status:
Offline
|
|
OK, look. You've got an hour before I trade it in on an older model XJS with the 6 Stromberg carburetors and NO 3-way catalytic converters.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Apr 2005
Status:
Offline
|
|
Something like 1/5 Americans also come from Mexico.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: South of the Mason-Dixon line
Status:
Offline
|
|
whoa
*SMACKDOWN*
hellyeah
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Calgary
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Atheist
As long as the 1 in 5 doesn't vote, I'm fine with it. You can't fix everything.
It's possible that they're more likely to vote than the 4 who got the question right
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Across from the wallpaper store.
Status:
Offline
|
|
A recent study also concluded that men talk just as much as women…
I'll take these things with a grain of salt as well.
|
Being in debt and celebrating a lower deficit is like being on a diet and celebrating the fact you gained two pounds this week instead of five.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: midwest
Status:
Offline
|
|
Apparently 3 in 5 people believe everything they read on the internet.
no actual poll cited + no survey stats + no demographic + heavy political pandering = complete BS.
I don't buy it, not for a minute.
|
ebuddy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: midwest
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Wiskedjak
It's possible that they're more likely to vote than the 4 who got the question right
Statistically, this is incorrect. The primary factor differentiating voters from non-voters in the US is education. The more educated one is, the more likely they are to vote. In other words, it's more likely the one who got the question wrong will not vote. Assuming the survey is correct, I thank God for our voting demographic.
|
ebuddy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: midwest
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by OldManMac
even though they can always find $5 for a pack of cigarettes...
WildHorse Ultra-Light 100s are less than $2.00/pack and every bit as pleasant as Marlboro Ultra-Lights 100s.
|
ebuddy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Grizzled Veteran
Join Date: Jan 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Be a real American and roll your own cigs!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: T •
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by nonhuman
Clearly, there is something wrong with our education system.
I don't think that is the only problem, there seems to be some sort of stupid gene involved also..
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Regular
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: .be
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by analogue SPRINKLES
I don't think that is the only problem, there seems to be some sort of stupid gene involved also..
Since I'm busy quoting Wilde anyway, let me add this one:
America is the only country that went from barbarism to decadence without civilization in between.
And before anyone accuses me of bashing Americans, I'm sure he meant it as a joke.
|
Moderation is a fatal thing. Nothing succeeds like excess.
Oscar Wilde
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: South of the Mason-Dixon line
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by ebuddy
Apparently 3 in 5 people believe everything they read on the internet.
no actual poll cited + no survey stats + no demographic + heavy political pandering = complete BS.
I don't buy it, not for a minute.
Actually the writer does attribute his sources. You just have to actually look for it...
SOURCE: SCIENTIFIC SAVVY? IN U.S., NOT MUCH, NEW YORK TIMES, AUGUST 30, 2005
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Zip, Boom, Bam
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by nonhuman
Actually the writer does attribute his sources. You just have to actually look for it...
Looks to me like he said poll, survey stats, demographics, not source.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: aurora
Status:
Offline
|
|
Actually you are wrong doofy. This is the order of the planets starting with the one closest to the sun. Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, Pluto. Our planet is actually in the perfect place because its not too far away from the sun like Mars but not too close to the sun like Mercury. We don't need more standardized testing. We just need a chart in the classroom that shows the planets for children. As long as we don't impose our wacky theories on them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Baltimore, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by CRASH HARDDRIVE
Looks to me like he said poll, survey stats, demographics, not source.
Yes, well if you look up the source that he quoted you'll find all those other things as well...
Admittedly this makes it seem as though the author made the mistake of relying on someone else's interpretation of the data, but it still gives us the opportunity to see where he got his information and see where his source got their information, and to see the raw data and decide for ourselves.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by ApeInTheShell
Actually you are wrong doofy. This is the order of the planets starting with the one closest to the sun. Mercury, Venus, Earth, Mars, Jupiter, Saturn, Uranus, Neptune, Pluto. Our planet is actually in the perfect place because its not too far away from the sun like Mars but not too close to the sun like Mercury. We don't need more standardized testing. We just need a chart in the classroom that shows the planets for children. As long as we don't impose our wacky theories on them.
Not to nitpick, but speaking of old science...
What about Pluto and Charon's ambiguity, and Ceres and Eris, and so forth?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2000
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by nonhuman
Actually the Sun and the Earth both revolve around a point somewhere between the two. The Sun being vastly more massive than the Earth that point is much much closer to the Sun than it is to the Earth. The difference in mass may even be so great that the point about which the both orbit is within the Sun itself, in which case it would be entirely accurate to say that the Earth revolves around the Sun while the Sun merely wobbles a bit in its orbit.
Of course this relationship is significantly complicated by the gravitational interactions of other bodies in the solar system.
Unless you're talking about The Sun. Or, I suppose, if you're referring to frames of reference...
For the record, the earth-sun barycenter is indeed inside the sun.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doofy
Of course. It all depends on what you take as the static point in the Universe.
If I take it to be, say, me then when I get in the Doofmobile to go to the pub then the Earth is revolving around me. As is the Sun. And all the honeys at the pub.
It's all relative to whatever point you take to be the fixed, static axis.
Actually, I hate to say it... but...
As anyone with an engineering physics background should know, this is a legitimate argument. Issues in physics are addressed this way, by actually making a moving object your point of reference, and then the moving object is still while things are moving past it.
Not that I think that's the argument that people who failed this test made, but it's a legitimate academic argument none the less.
|
8 Core 2.8 ghz Mac Pro/GF8800/2 23" Cinema Displays, 3.06 ghz Macbook Pro
Once you wanted revolution, now you're the institution, how's it feel to be the man?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: midwest
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by nonhuman
Yes, well if you look up the source that he quoted you'll find all those other things as well...
Really? Unless you've paid the $7.95 to read the Abstract, I'm not sure how you'd know this. I'm not able to find it any other way. It should be noted however that "Dr. Miller" enjoys funding from various sources for his research. For credibilities' sake, it is often good information to have. When it's provided of course.
Admittedly this makes it seem as though the author made the mistake of relying on someone else's interpretation of the data, but it still gives us the opportunity to see where he got his information and see where his source got their information, and to see the raw data and decide for ourselves.
I'm glad this is important to you now. It didn't seem to me you were very interested in validating any of the claims by openly supplying any of this information in the first place and neither did the article to which you linked. Usually, I've had good luck finding original survey/polling data. In this case for whatever reason, it is not as readily available.
NEW YORK TIMES is not a science publication nor is it an educational endeavor. I've looked and have yet to see any raw data in order to decide for myself. I'm not saying it's not true, but I'd like more information to make an educated decision.
|
ebuddy
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|