 |
 |
The future of photomanipulation...
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: A House of Ill-Repute in the Sky
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: South Korea
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Dakarʒ 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
That's a useful algorithm for resizing some photos.
(
Last edited by Super Mario; Jan 10, 2018 at 02:43 PM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Sep 2001
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hey, cool beans. 
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Back in the Good Ole US of A
Status:
Offline
|
|
Just wait till they start doing that with video. Soon will come the day when video imagery will be totally unreliable as proof of anything.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: A House of Ill-Repute in the Sky
Status:
Offline
|
|
Toyota and Ratchet & Clank have been pushing that boundary for a while.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Your Anus
Status:
Offline
|
|
Interesting, but I doubt it will work that well on pictures that have not been prepped extensively.
Doesn't seem that useful either.
Reminds me of how Pixar made two versions of Bug's Life to compensate for the 4:3 fullscreen version.
The actually rendered two versions of many scenes, so they would fit better.
|
My sig is 1 pixel too big.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by ort888
Reminds me of how Pixar made two versions of Bug's Life to compensate for the 4:3 fullscreen version.
The actually rendered two versions of many scenes, so they would fit better.
Why didn't they do what most filmmakers do and use 4:3, 1.85:1, 16:10 and 2:35.1 overlay guides on their virtual camera and crop/letterbox the 4:3 output?
(
Last edited by Super Mario; Jan 10, 2018 at 02:43 PM.
)
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Apr 2007
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Feb 2001
Location: Your Anus
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Super Mario
Why didn't they do what most filmmakers do and use 4:3, 1.85:1, 16:10 and 2:35.1 overlay guides on their virtual camera and crop/letterbox the 4:3 output?
You really can't imagine the benefit?
Here's a quick sample of what they did and why.
Widescreen-o-Rama! All About Aspect Ratios (scroll down a bit)
|
My sig is 1 pixel too big.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jan 2001
Location: Australia
Status:
Offline
|
|
amazing, Apple should build this into the OS.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top