[ebuddy]

Originally Posted by hyteckit 

I use watch his show on TV on a regular basis, before discovering Bill Maher on Politically Incorrect.

I don't believe you. You have zero credibility here.

Discovered what an idiot Rush Limbaugh is.

... and your expertise is? I mean, why should your critique of this man's intellect be taken seriously?

He spends most of his show blaming others and complaining about liberals, liberal media, Clinton, immigrants, blacks, gays, and so forth.

Liberals? Yes. Liberal media? Yes. Clinton? Yes. Illegal immigration? Yes. (you superior intellectuals can't seem to separate immigration from illegal immigration.) Blacks? Uh... no. I have no idea what you're talking about. I have a hunch the numerous blacks who contribute to his program including fill-in hosts and the screener might have a problem with this. Gays? No. A Gay Agenda? Yes.

He's a drug addict who can't maintain his own marriage and divorce multiple times.

He is? Have you not renewed your subscription to the Daily Kos since 2003?

He is a fat head with a fat body who only cares out getting fat, taking drugs, and making money.

Actually, he's lost quite a lot of weight in the past 8-10 months and it looks like it might be collecting on Al Gore. Is being fat somehow reprehensible now? There's a great many fat-a$$ed commie libs relying on your support.

He travels to Asia with packs of Viagra.

I'm sure you've gotten this wrong. The bumper sticker wasn't large enough I'm guessing.

He symbolizes greed, gluttony, sloth, wrath, lust, and pride.

How do these things not represent you? I laughed at the wrath thing though. That's rich.

The WRATH of RUSH!!!

[Chongo]

Originally Posted by stupendousman 

Again, if that's the best the people of his district have to offer, that's a sad commentary on the people of district. To suggest that they can't have good representation without going to a corrupt, pathological liar simply is laughable.

Originally Posted by Wiskedjak 

Again, that's *exactly* what the rest of the world thought when you re-elected Bill Clinton.

Fixed

[Wiskedjak]

Originally Posted by Chongo 

Fixed

Yep. Point being, from the other side of the fence, it's always difficult to understand why someone chooses to elect someone you disagree with.

[screener]

Originally Posted by Chongo 

Fixed

To funny.
Clinton is popular just about everywhere and Bush is reviled just about everywhere.

The right wingnuts really do live in a strange reality.

[hyteckit]

Originally Posted by ebuddy 

I don't believe you. You have zero credibility here.

I just checked my credibility level here. It's higher than yours.

Originally Posted by ebuddy 

... and your expertise is? I mean, why should your critique of this man's intellect be taken seriously?

Don't tell me, you have a degree in idiocy? I can't have an opinion now? Yes, Rush Limbaugh is an idiot. A big fat idiot.

Google "Rush Idiot"

http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q...&aq=f&oq=&aqi=

There's even a book titled "Rush Limbaugh Is a Big Fat Idiot" written by the new US Senator Al Franken.

http://www.amazon.com/Rush-Limbaugh-.../dp/0440508649

Originally Posted by ebuddy 

Liberals? Yes. Liberal media? Yes. Clinton? Yes. Illegal immigration? Yes. (you superior intellectuals can't seem to separate immigration from illegal immigration.) Blacks? Uh... no. I have no idea what you're talking about. I have a hunch the numerous blacks who contribute to his program including fill-in hosts and the screener might have a problem with this. Gays? No. A Gay Agenda? Yes.


He is? Have you not renewed your subscription to the Daily Kos since 2003?

I watched more of Rush Limbaugh's TV show than I'm been on Daily Kos website. I think I've visited Daily Kos about maybe a dozen times.

Originally Posted by ebuddy 

Actually, he's lost quite a lot of weight in the past 8-10 months and it looks like it might be collecting on Al Gore. Is being fat somehow reprehensible now? There's a great many fat-a$$ed commie libs relying on your support.


I'm sure you've gotten this wrong. The bumper sticker wasn't large enough I'm guessing.

What? That he travels overseas with Viagra? Don't you know, you are a Rush fan. He's fat and get his penis up unless he has Viagra.

Originally Posted by ebuddy 

How do these things not represent you? I laughed at the wrath thing though. That's rich.

The WRATH of RUSH!!!

Yeah, Rush is an angry angry man. He's angry on every show. Bunch is pussy Republicans have to apologize to Rush Limbaugh after suffering his wrath.

[Snow-i]

Originally Posted by hyteckit 

I just checked my credibility level here. It's higher than yours.

I also enjoy the smell of my own farts.

Don't tell me, you have a degree in idiocy? I can't have an opinion now? Yes, Rush Limbaugh is an idiot. A big fat idiot.

You have an opinion that you state over and over and over as fact, much like a child with your hands over your ears. No one asks you to change your opinion, just understand that the world doesn't revolve around it. Maybe then others could understand it too.

What? That he travels overseas with Viagra? Don't you know, you are a Rush fan. He's fat and get his penis up unless he has Viagra.

For a liberal you really suck at being politically correct. Whats wrong with fat people? And what's with your obsession with Rush Limbaugh's penis? You can't seriously be talking about your credibility in one sentence and a talk show host's penis in the next?

Yeah, Rush is an angry angry man. He's angry on every show. Bunch is pussy Republicans have to apologize to Rush Limbaugh after suffering his wrath.

No one apologizes for rush, much in the same way no one here apologizes for you.


I would enjoy your posts alot more if you had anything substantial in them to support your views. Sometimes you almost get there but quickly flush that down the toilet. I'd really enjoy hearing the logic behind your statements...but over and over you offer none and in its place talk about viagra and rush getting his penis up. Hardly important for the issues at hand, would you not agree?

[Big Mac]

Anyone else feel a few brain cells die after reading this thread?

[ebuddy]

hyteckit calls Rush Limbaugh an idiot:

Originally Posted by hyteckit

I watched more of Rush Limbaugh's TV show than I'm been on Daily Kos website.

Originally Posted by hyteckit

He's fat and get his penis up unless he has Viagra.

Originally Posted by hyteckit

Yeah, Rush is an angry angry man.

I was thinking why not go all the way with this one. You know... something like; "Rush is an angry angry angry angry man."

Originally Posted by hyteckit

Bunch is pussy Republicans have to apologize to Rush Limbaugh after suffering his wrath.

Let me see if I got this... Bunch is pussy Republicans...
Nope... still doesn't make a damn bit of sense.

Congrats hyteckit, you now have less than zero credibility here.
Friggin' priceless.

[Chuckit]

is => of

Unless you want me to do a screed on what all the misused punctuation and questionable grammar in your post says about your intellectual (and possibly sexual) prowess, perhaps you should be a little bit less cruel with regards to others' English errors.

[hyteckit]

Originally Posted by Snow-i 

I also enjoy the smell of my own farts.

I suggest that you stop sniffing your ass? But I guess if you enjoy it, please continue.

Originally Posted by Snow-i 

You have an opinion that you state over and over and over as fact, much like a child with your hands over your ears. No one asks you to change your opinion, just understand that the world doesn't revolve around it. Maybe then others could understand it too.





For a liberal you really suck at being politically correct. Whats wrong with fat people? And what's with your obsession with Rush Limbaugh's penis? You can't seriously be talking about your credibility in one sentence and a talk show host's penis in the next?

I don't know. Republicans were and still are quite obsessed with Clinton's penis.

Originally Posted by Snow-i 

No one apologizes for rush, much in the same way no one here apologizes for you.

Apologize for Rush? No, I said apologize to Rush. Big difference in meaning.

Originally Posted by Snow-i 

I would enjoy your posts alot more if you had anything substantial in them to support your views. Sometimes you almost get there but quickly flush that down the toilet. I'd really enjoy hearing the logic behind your statements...but over and over you offer none and in its place talk about viagra and rush getting his penis up. Hardly important for the issues at hand, would you not agree?

From a guy who doesn't know the difference between "apologize to Rush" and "apologize for Rush".

[hyteckit]

Originally Posted by ebuddy 

Let me see if I got this... Bunch is pussy Republicans...
Nope... still doesn't make a damn bit of sense.

Yeah, pussy Republicans. Republicans who are a bunch of pussies because they don't have the guts to stand up for what they've said about Rush.

Originally Posted by ebuddy 

Congrats hyteckit, you now have less than zero credibility here.
Friggin' priceless.

Reply form ebuddy:

... and your expertise is? I mean, why should your critique of this man's intellect be taken seriously?

[ebuddy]

Originally Posted by Chuckit 

is => of

Unless you want me to do a screed on what all the misused punctuation and questionable grammar in your post says about your intellectual (and possibly sexual) prowess, perhaps you should be a little bit less cruel with regards to others' English errors.

I'd of course welcome you to find any post of mine that comes even close to the incoherent mess I responded to. I appreciate your attempt at fairness, but the irony of him calling someone else an idiot was apparently lost on you. I think my response to him was not only fair, but wholly warranted. I also don't see how my response to him suggests anything of my sexual prowess nor do I think it'd behoove a moderator to start challenging forum rules.

BTW, it goes way beyond grammatical errors Chuckit.

[Snow-i]

Originally Posted by hyteckit 

Yeah, pussy Republicans. Republicans who are a bunch of pussies because they don't have the guts to stand up for what they've said about Rush.

Really? How can you take yourself seriously...or expect anyone else here to?

... and your expertise is? I mean, why should your critique of this man's intellect be taken seriously?

Because ebuddy has demonstrated time and again that he's competent to provide meaningful arguments and productive responses towards thought-worthy discourse.

You do the same....just on a much smaller percentage of your posts.

[hyteckit]

Originally Posted by ebuddy 

I'd of course welcome you to find any post of mine that comes even close to the incoherent mess I responded to. I appreciate your attempt at fairness, but the irony of him calling someone else an idiot was apparently lost on you. I think my response to him was not only fair, but wholly warranted. I also don't see how my response to him suggests anything of my sexual prowess nor do I think it'd behoove a moderator to start challenging forum rules.

BTW, it goes way beyond grammatical errors Chuckit.

I don't know what to tell you ebuddy. This thread is filled with a bunch of ramblings and incomplete sentences from both you and me.

I do random edits to my post and don't necessary correct every word. Yes, there are typos and grammatical errors.

Chuckit has the intelligence to figure out that "is => of". Yet you can't figure that out ebuddy?

If you can't make sense of "Bunch is pussy Republicans", that reflects on your intelligence, not mine.

Even a 2nd grader can figure out that "is => of" if s/he were to correct the sentence. Why can't you ebuddy?

[hyteckit]

Originally Posted by Snow-i 

Really? How can you take yourself seriously...or expect anyone else here to?

Because ebuddy has demonstrated time and again that he's competent to provide meaningful arguments and productive responses towards thought-worthy discourse.

You do the same....just on a much smaller percentage of your posts.

Meaningful arguments? Really? I disagree.

I haven't read a single meaningful argument from him in this thread.

Here's a summary of ebuddy's argument after I call Rush Limbaugh an idiot.

Me: Rush is an angry idiot
ebuddy: Have you ever listen to his show?
Me: I have seen many of Rush's TV show before discovering Political Incorrect
ebuddy: I don't believe you, you have no zero credibility here. What's your expertise in critiquing Rush's intellect
Me: It's my opinion that Rush is an idiot. I don't I need a degree to have an opinion.
ebuddy: Oh yeah, "Bunch is pussy Republicans" doesn't make a damn bit of sense.
Me: Well, I'm sure even a 2nd grader has the intelligence to figure out what that meant and what I intended to say.


ebuddy sounds like a teenager trying to win an argument without substance.

I don't believe you. You don't know nothing. Oh yeah, your breath stinks.

[hyteckit]

Search for "Big Fat Idiot" on google and who do you get?

Rush Limbaugh.

big fat idiot - Google Search

Wow, 9 out of the 10 results on the 1st page. Rush Limbaugh pretty much dominates in the Google search results for the search term "Big Fat Idiot".

[turtle777]

Originally Posted by hyteckit 

Search for "Big Fat Idiot" on google and who do you get?

Rush Limbaugh.

big fat idiot - Google Search

Wow, 9 out of the 10 results on the 1st page. Rush Limbaugh pretty much dominates in the Google search results for the search term "Big Fat Idiot".

Uhm, because it's a book, written by a complete non-partisan, Al Franken.
Pretty much anytime you enter a book title in Google, it will dominate the hits.

So, who looks stupid now ?

-t

[Snow-i]

Originally Posted by hyteckit 

Search for "Big Fat Idiot" on google and who do you get?

Rush Limbaugh.

big fat idiot - Google Search

Wow, 9 out of the 10 results on the 1st page. Rush Limbaugh pretty much dominates in the Google search results for the search term "Big Fat Idiot".

Don't you have better things to do with your time and conversely, waste ours with? What does this have to do with anything? And are you really trying to make your ideals look valid? Should I even bring up credibility again?

[Snow-i]

Originally Posted by hyteckit 

Meaningful arguments? Really? I disagree.

I haven't read a single meaningful argument from him in this thread.

Here's a summary of ebuddy's argument after I call Rush Limbaugh an idiot.

Me: Rush is an angry idiot
ebuddy: Have you ever listen to his show?
Me: I have seen many of Rush's TV show before discovering Political Incorrect
ebuddy: I don't believe you, you have no zero credibility here. What's your expertise in critiquing Rush's intellect
Me: It's my opinion that Rush is an idiot. I don't I need a degree to have an opinion.
ebuddy: Oh yeah, "Bunch is pussy Republicans" doesn't make a damn bit of sense.
Me: Well, I'm sure even a 2nd grader has the intelligence to figure out what that meant and what I intended to say.


ebuddy sounds like a teenager trying to win an argument without substance.

I don't believe you. You don't know nothing. Oh yeah, your breath stinks.

Your whole premise is not in the least bit meaningful. "Rush is an idiot" is not relevant or meaningful in any way. Now, if you have specific examples to validate that statement which are relevant than thats a whole 'nother story. Thats what you were asked to present.

Instead you spoke of viagra and limbaugh's penis, then went on about how credible you are as a source.


If you had something substantial -more than useless political drivel, attacks, and name-calling- than I would LOVE to engage you in an actual, productive, discussion on the state of everything right now. Until then I can't help but agree with ebuddy. You haven't presented anything of substance otherwise.

I could go through and pick out the arguments that were insightful and well-crafted, if you would like, from ebuddy as well as you.

I'll reiterate a previous post of mine...you are capable of making well presented and supported arguments, but often you choose a path like this thread instead. I'd just like to get some meaningful discussion out of you. I've enjoyed watching you and ebuddy present arguments in many other threads. Though sometimes the both of you get too personal with it, nonetheless you both offer something to think about. I see none of that in this thread.

[subego]

Talk about putting his hooks in people. hyteckit is the one who needs a radio show.

[turtle777]

Originally Posted by subego 

Talk about putting his hooks in people. hyteckit is the one who needs a radio show.

Really ?

In hyteckit's case, I would just call it trolling, and leave it at that.

-t

[subego]

Originally Posted by turtle777 

In hyteckit's case, I would just call it trolling

[hyteckit]

Originally Posted by Snow-i 

Your whole premise is not in the least bit meaningful. "Rush is an idiot" is not relevant or meaningful in any way. Now, if you have specific examples to validate that statement which are relevant than thats a whole 'nother story. Thats what you were asked to present.

Instead you spoke of viagra and limbaugh's penis, then went on about how credible you are as a source.

How is calling Rush Limbaugh an idiot not relevant to this thread?

This whole thread is about Rush Limbaugh being an idiot.

I'm not just randomly jumping into different threads calling Rush Limbaugh an idiot.

Example?

How about Rush Limbaugh being an idiot for blaming Obama for Sanford's affair.

See. Very relevant to the thread.

[Snow-i]

Originally Posted by hyteckit 

How is calling Rush Limbaugh an idiot not relevant to this thread?

This whole thread is about Rush Limbaugh being an idiot.

I'm not just randomly jumping into different threads calling Rush Limbaugh an idiot.

Example?

How about Rush Limbaugh being an idiot for blaming Obama for Sanford's affair.

See. Very relevant to the thread.

Right...

You are certainly entitled to voice your opinion about rush. No one is arguing that. I guess we can just wrap this one up then.

Hyteckit thinks rush is an idiot. Case closed. Great!

[hyteckit]

Originally Posted by Snow-i 

Right...

You are certainly entitled to voice your opinion about rush. No one is arguing that. I guess we can just wrap this one up then.

Hyteckit thinks rush is an idiot. Case closed. Great!

Yup. That's pretty much it to this thread.

There are those who think Rush is an idiot for believing Sanford's Affair is Obama's fault.

Then there are others who do not think Rush is an idiot, and Rush doesn't really believe Sanford's affair Obama's fault. It was only a "hook" and not to be taken seriously.

Then there are the small minority who agrees with Rush and believe Sanford's affair is Obama's fault.

[CRASH HARDDRIVE]

Then there are those of us who believe it's impossible that you're older than 14.

[hyteckit]

Originally Posted by CRASH HARDDRIVE 

Then there are those of us who believe it's impossible that you're older than 14.

If I'm 14, then you must be like 5?

[Snow-i]

Originally Posted by hyteckit 

Yup. That's pretty much it to this thread.

There are those who think Rush is an idiot for believing Sanford's Affair is Obama's fault.

Then there are others who do not think Rush is an idiot, and Rush doesn't really believe Sanford's affair Obama's fault. It was only a "hook" and not to be taken seriously.

Then there are the small minority who agrees with Rush and believe Sanford's affair is Obama's fault.

So essentially you've wasted everyone's time here. Not interested in any discussion, just childish name calling for a political commentator? What was it you said about credibility earlier?

How can you expect anyone to take you seriously? How can you expect to persuade people when this is the example you set. If this is what comes of your ideals, then you're doing nothing but further entrenching those with differing ideals into their place...as your credibility as a mature and productive member of our society wanes. The circle continues, and the lines of communication between differing ideologies become cut.

[hyteckit]

Originally Posted by Snow-i 

So essentially you've wasted everyone's time here. Not interested in any discussion, just childish name calling for a political commentator? What was it you said about credibility earlier?

How can you expect anyone to take you seriously? How can you expect to persuade people when this is the example you set. If this is what comes of your ideals, then you're doing nothing but further entrenching those with differing ideals into their place...as your credibility as a mature and productive member of our society wanes. The circle continues, and the lines of communication between differing ideologies become cut.

The discussion was about whether Rush is an idiot. You can agree or disagree and argue your point. Or just provide your opinion.

I've provide my opinion and attempted to argue my point.

This thread is not suppose to be about my credibility, my age, my grammar, or my expertise, so why have a childish discussion about it?

I didn't start the thread, erik did. I don't know how you accuses me of wasting everyone's time. ebuddy, CRASH HARDDRIVE, and you are wasting everyone's time by attacking me and not talk about the subject in this thread.

Challenge the arguments, not attacking the person making the arguments.

[Snow-i]

Originally Posted by hyteckit 

The discussion was about whether Rush is an idiot. You can agree or disagree and argue your point. Or just provide your opinion.

You didn't want to discuss anything. I had several posts with arguments and support for them, of which you failed to adequately address a single one.

I've provide my opinion and attempted to argue my point.

If by argue you mean repeat yourself over and over with zero elaboration, then yes, yes you did.

This thread is not suppose to be about my credibility, my age, my grammar, or my expertise, so why have a childish discussion about it?

It comes into question when you make statements about it. You brought it up. Not me.

I didn't start the thread, erik did. I don't know how you accuses me of wasting everyone's time. ebuddy, CRASH HARDDRIVE, and you are wasting everyone's time by attacking me and not talk about the subject in this thread.

We've done nothing but talk about the topic, and all you've done is talk about rush's penis, viagra, and numerous other non-points. You haven't discussed or supported any of your statements, and made ridiculous accusations founded in pure, petty hatred for an entertainer. I'll give you quotes on what I mean if you so wish for me to compile a list and actually support my statements.

Challenge the arguments, not attacking the person making the arguments.

Hellooooooo thats all we did. We're "attacking you" for not supporting your arguments and making ridiculous statements. Don't say something if you're unwilling or unable to back it up. You open yourself up to well-founded criticism for doing so.

[- - e r i k - -]

This has to be the first time I've unsubscribed to my own thread. Way to go guys!

[CRASH HARDDRIVE]