 |
 |
even *I* think these are funny.
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Baltimore, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: May 2000
Location: Oregon
Status:
Offline
|
|
haha..good/true and funny
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: North-Eastern New Jersey
Status:
Offline
|
|
First article was pretty good stuff, although I really don't see InDesign and Quark as too far apart feature-wise. I suppose if I understood more about why opentype is supposed to be some sort of "god-send" then I'd "get it" a little more. Meanwhile, perfectly happy with Quark here and can't wait for 6 
From the second link:
PDF creation technology has been incorporated into QuarkXPress 6, allowing users to output PDF files directly from QuarkXPress without having to purchase a license for third-party software.
That's a great feature actually, I'm glad. It's idiotic having to buy Acrobat just so I can distill PDF files. Let's face facts, nobody actually buys Acrobat for anything else. Besides, if it's so "evil" to make creating PDF's free and public domain, then I suppose Apple will have to answer a sh_tload for so many things built into OSX.
MikeM
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Baltimore, MD
Status:
Offline
|
|
Theres another reason for Acrobat, *batch* distilling of PDFs.
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: May 1999
Location: New York City
Status:
Offline
|
|
funny
adobe must target the output houses and printers with great simple software to process indesign
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top