|
|
16-core MacPros coming in August?
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: here
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
That's 2 Socket 2011 Sandy Bridge-EP processors - market name Xeon E5 - and August is impressively early if true. I fully expects that next MP to look like that, but August?
|
The new Mac Pro has up to 30 MB of cache inside the processor itself. That's more than the HD in my first Mac. Somehow I'm still running out of space.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Oct 2000
Location: Los Angeles
Status:
Offline
|
|
P, could you explain why Intel is going to such a substantially increased pin count with Socket 2011? Why are so many more pins needed for the high end socket this generation?
|
"The natural progress of things is for liberty to yield and government to gain ground." TJ
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
Tthere are two obvious changes:
- There are now 4 memory channels instead of 3
- Sandy Bridge-EP supports no less than 40 PCIe lanes from the CPU - ie, two x16 GPUs and 8 lanes left over. Nehalem only supported 16 directly from the CPU, with the other lanes coming from either northbridge or southbridge and then sent to the CPU (and main memory) over QPI.
This last is because the remainder of the northbridge has finally moved onto the CPU die, like it already did for the desktop CPUs.
|
The new Mac Pro has up to 30 MB of cache inside the processor itself. That's more than the HD in my first Mac. Somehow I'm still running out of space.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: here
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by P
That's 2 Socket 2011 Sandy Bridge-EP processors - market name Xeon E5 - and August is impressively early if true. I fully expects that next MP to look like that, but August?
I know that's much earlier than it could be. But I read about Apple is cutting a deal with Intel to get them so early.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Elite
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: here
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by P
Tthere are two obvious changes:
- There are now 4 memory channels instead of 3
- Sandy Bridge-EP supports no less than 40 PCIe lanes from the CPU - ie, two x16 GPUs and 8 lanes left over. Nehalem only supported 16 directly from the CPU, with the other lanes coming from either northbridge or southbridge and then sent to the CPU (and main memory) over QPI.
This last is because the remainder of the northbridge has finally moved onto the CPU die, like it already did for the desktop CPUs.
How much would this increase of PCI lanes speed up the computer?
It sounds like that 16-core would be a very strong machine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Veltliner
How much would this increase of PCI lanes speed up the computer?
Impossible to say without knowing how the links are implemented on the die. The potential gain is mainly that you can put 2 GPUs on x16 links with direct access to RAM without going over a QPI link - or 4 GPUs, if x8 is enough bandwidth. That mostly makes sense for GPU computing. Other than that...there are two 4x links going straight to the CPU over, even after the GPU links are spoken for. Thunderbolt?
Intel also says that they will make a 4 socket version of Sandy Bridge-EP, yet it only has 2 QPI links. I wonder how that will work - will they put the chips in a square, so each chip can reach two others - sort of like a ring bus? If so, it makes sense to cut down on the traffic on the QPI channels.
|
The new Mac Pro has up to 30 MB of cache inside the processor itself. That's more than the HD in my first Mac. Somehow I'm still running out of space.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|