 |
 |
Have you seen this? It's very interesting!!
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Boca Raton, Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
Dual G5 2.0, PB AL 17/1Gz,PB Ti/667,iMac/800 FP,Lombard/400,Wallstreet/250, PowerPC/75,PB 520c,Centris 610
Classic II,Newton 120,Apple IIe
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Boca Raton, Florida
Status:
Offline
|
|
|
|
|
Dual G5 2.0, PB AL 17/1Gz,PB Ti/667,iMac/800 FP,Lombard/400,Wallstreet/250, PowerPC/75,PB 520c,Centris 610
Classic II,Newton 120,Apple IIe
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Dedicated MacNNer
Join Date: May 2002
Location: The Swamp
Status:
Offline
|
|
Misleading article, the mid-range comparison doesn't make any sense, the X200 doesn't have a Pentium-M processor in the first place, so I have no clue if they tried a 600m, 500m, or what (me thinks 500m since they mentioned shared graphics mem). As far as the high-end one, the 15" PB cannot be configured with 256 mem and a 1 GHz processor from the Apple store, they probably mean the 867MHz version. Besides, the X200 and the iBook aren't quite in the same grouping anyway, the X200 is an ultralight, while the iBook kind of falls between the ultralight and thin-and-light segments.
|
|
12" PB 1 GHz Combo, 60GB, 512MB, AE
40GB iPod
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Top