|
|
Car Talk (Page 21)
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Doc HM
So in our brave new automotive world of zero tailpipe emissions it turns out that Rolls Royce are booming. Sales in particular of their 3 tonne "**** you pauper" 4x4 idiot wagon are up as is the insanity of people with 32,000 times more money than sense sometimes doubling the price of their car by bespoking it, including paint with diamonds crushed into it, leather with stitching from a rose bred especially for rolls Royce so no other person can ever grow them (yes really) and someone with a planetarium complete with shooting stars embedded into the roof.
https://www.theguardian.com/business...ke-rolls-royce
I for one welcome our new fire resistant overlords.
I don’t judge people for spending too much money, but I do judge them for bad taste. That interior is horrid.
(
Last edited by subego; Jan 13, 2020 at 02:48 PM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Hit the 6 month mark on the Aquapel, and it’s starting to get back to normal. Figured what the hell, I’ll re-up.
Edit: oh, yeah... just drove 2 hours in the rain. Windshield sucked.
Edit two: happened again. I really hate the untreated window. The wipers never get it clean.
(
Last edited by subego; Jan 25, 2020 at 11:09 AM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by subego
I don’t judge people for spending too much money, but I do judge them for bad taste. That interior is horrid.
It is obscene but on the other hand there are fewer things these days that have the level of craftsmanship to the match the nice things of days gone by. We have flat pack disposable furniture instead of invincible hand-carved, ornate hardwood masterpieces. I know they aren't equivalent but even a lot of posh stuff is just cheaply made/designed out of needlessly expensive materials. Or worse they just have some arseholes name on and the price got tripled as a result.
The wooden veneers they use on the dashboard of a Rolls Royce are symmetrical down the centre because they take a veneer, then split it in half and fan it out like a butterfly. The leather they use is grade 1 which means the cows live in fields with no barbed wire so they don't get nick themselves and cause imperfections.
They may be crazy expensive and ostentatious, but they are master crafted. I have a lot of time for that.
|
I have plenty of more important things to do, if only I could bring myself to do them....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa, how long can this be? Does it really ruin the left column spacing?
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Waragainstsleep
It is obscene but on the other hand there are fewer things these days that have the level of craftsmanship to the match the nice things of days gone by. We have flat pack disposable furniture instead of invincible hand-carved, ornate hardwood masterpieces.
Those things still exist, you just don't want to pay for them when you get 90% of the function for 10% of the price.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Laminar
Those things still exist, you just don't want to pay for them when you get 90% of the function for 10% of the price.
They do but I feel like a lot of them are super minimalist and the price tag reflects the name or the level of pretentiousness more than the man hours that goes into making them.
|
I have plenty of more important things to do, if only I could bring myself to do them....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa, how long can this be? Does it really ruin the left column spacing?
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Waragainstsleep
They do but I feel like a lot of them are super minimalist and the price tag reflects the name or the level of pretentiousness more than the man hours that goes into making them.
Yes, that is how literally every product in the world is priced. Price is based on perceived value.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Laminar
Yes, that is how literally every product in the world is priced. Price is based on perceived value.
Some things are priced based on the amount of work that goes into them, the amount of skill involved and the years of training required to master those skills. Others are priced based on what some overpaid idiot will pay for it. Like the difference between a pair of hand-tailored Italian leather shoes and some stupid limited edition rubber trainers (sneakers) with a badge from a rapper on them.
|
I have plenty of more important things to do, if only I could bring myself to do them....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa, how long can this be? Does it really ruin the left column spacing?
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Waragainstsleep
Some things are priced based on the amount of work that goes into them, the amount of skill involved and the years of training required to master those skills.
False. Price is always based on what you can get someone to pay for your goods.
Communicating to your customer all of the skill involved and fine details inlaid in the product increases perceived value and allows you to capture a higher price. As does touting exclusivity or rarity.
"This fine artisan hardwood dining room table is expensive because it uses the finest materials and was built by the most experienced craftsman" is false, wrong, and backwards. It is what the marketers will say to you and what they want you to believe. "You get what you pay for" is the kind of thing marketing departments of premium products like to chant over and over again.
"This fine artisan hardwood dining room table is expensive because people perceive value in the design and expected longevity of the furniture" is correct.
Cost of production does not determine price. Market determines price.
Cost of production only determines profit margin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Laminar
False. Price is always based on what you can get someone to pay for your goods.
Communicating to your customer all of the skill involved and fine details inlaid in the product increases perceived value and allows you to capture a higher price. As does touting exclusivity or rarity.
"This fine artisan hardwood dining room table is expensive because it uses the finest materials and was built by the most experienced craftsman" is false, wrong, and backwards. It is what the marketers will say to you and what they want you to believe. "You get what you pay for" is the kind of thing marketing departments of premium products like to chant over and over again.
"This fine artisan hardwood dining room table is expensive because people perceive value in the design and expected longevity of the furniture" is correct.
Cost of production does not determine price. Market determines price.
Cost of production only determines profit margin.
Depends who is doing the pricing.
One of the things I like about Ikea is that they regularly produce items that look really good but they don't jack the price up through the roof. I've seen them sell stuff for £5 they could easily get £25 for if they chose to. I'm sure there are higher end examples too. I imagine many companies have started out to fill a gap in a market by making something pretty and functional with the idea of undercutting the competition only to be persuaded before launch that they can triple the price because its so pretty and they'd be stupid not to.
|
I have plenty of more important things to do, if only I could bring myself to do them....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Laminar
False. Price is always based on what you can get someone to pay for your goods.
Communicating to your customer all of the skill involved and fine details inlaid in the product increases perceived value and allows you to capture a higher price. As does touting exclusivity or rarity.
"This fine artisan hardwood dining room table is expensive because it uses the finest materials and was built by the most experienced craftsman" is false, wrong, and backwards. It is what the marketers will say to you and what they want you to believe. "You get what you pay for" is the kind of thing marketing departments of premium products like to chant over and over again.
"This fine artisan hardwood dining room table is expensive because people perceive value in the design and expected longevity of the furniture" is correct.
Cost of production does not determine price. Market determines price.
Cost of production only determines profit margin.
Get your free market economy capitalist ass outta here.
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa, how long can this be? Does it really ruin the left column spacing?
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Waragainstsleep
Depends who is doing the pricing.
Yes, there are exceptions - underpricing to drive out competition and gain market dominance (selling a game console for less than it costs to manufacture to make your money back on the games), underpricing some items as loss leaders to get people to buy your normally-priced items (Ikea - I just go there for the great deals! *buys $300 in knick-knacks*).
Some small volume shops will do a cost+necessary profit margin = price calculation, but eventually they'll wonder why they're not very profitable, hire a consultant, and find out that their prices are too low and everybody thinks their stuff is shit, because "you get what you pay for." So they bump up prices and see an uptick in sales AND profit.
I used to love Harbor Freight for this - it was literally "how much does a 7 year old Chinese girl get paid to weld this engine stand together" + like 22% profit margin, then they hand out 20% off coupons like candy. So they were shit, but I was getting exactly as much as I paid for. I could go to Home Depot and buy the exact same item with different branding for 50% more because Home Depot knew that's the price they could capture for that item.
In the last couple of years they've strayed from that and are trying to establish themselves as a valid tool brand, so they've priced their power tools right up there with Milwaukee and they're trying to go for Snap-On and Craftsman with their $4000 tool boxes. No idea if it's working or not, but I'm sure as hell not shelling out Milwaukee prices for HF tools.
You always have to start with the principle that an item is priced at its perceived value and adjust from there.
Originally Posted by turtle777
Get your free market economy capitalist ass outta here.
-t
It blows me away to see people defending corporations - "Well, they spent a lot of money in R&D so they need to make it back with their high prices." No, they've convinced you that they've put tons of R&D and therefore value into the product, so you believe it is worth a higher price. Whether they've actually spent more on R&D than a competitor is unknown, and whether the R&D was effective is also unknown, but just by pricing the item high, they have people lining up to defend how fantastic the product must be.
One of the most obvious offenders is Apple with component options - a pair of 4GB DDR4 2666 modules like what comes in the iMac costs about $50. A pair of 8GB sticks runs $75. But if you have Apple pull those 4GB sticks out and put in a pair of 8GB sticks, they'll charge you $200 for the the pleasure, even though the component cost difference is under $25, that's an 800% markup. "Oh, but that's the difference between selling something off the shelf and having to custom build it," you say. Well, if that was the case then there'd be a static adder for "custom build," and the component prices would scale with cost i.e. $175 for the custom build, $25 for the components. Let's test that theory - a pair of 16GB sticks is $125, so we'd expect the static $175 for the custom build fee since it doesn't take any more labor to install a larger capacity pair of sticks. And the component price difference is $75. So the 32GB RAM option should cost $250. WRONG it's $600.
Price has nothing to do with cost and everything to do with what they know they can charge for it.
Car options are another great example - my wife's car came with the "Luxury Package," which includes a set of LED headlights instead of the stock projector lights, and a 19-speaker stereo instead of the utterly worthless plebeian stock 13 speaker stereo. Lincoln charged $4400 for this option from the factory. Fans would rave over the high tech LED lights, and gush over the incredible fidelity of the upgraded stereo.
Well, actually, the stock projector lights are much more complex - they have specific optics in the projector lens, along with a motorized shaft to actively aim them in the direction the car's traveling. Replacements from Ford are $1724 each. The luxury LEDs are fixed and simple, they use a normal reflector housing. Replacements from Ford are $1667 each.
Revel makes both the base model and upgraded stereos. So any measurements of the car's soundstage were already done for the base stereo. There was likely some marginal additional labor tuning the upgraded stereo, and maybe a couple hundred bucks in components.
So where does the $4400 come from? Because everybody wants the cool-ass LED headlights so it looks like an Acura. And we all know that more speakers = better. Same with factory wheel options - you're charging $1000 for a wheel that's the same size, same quality, same material, but it's BLACK which is AWESOME and I WANT IT.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Nobletucky
Status:
Offline
|
|
Effin’ LED headlights on an approaching car are such a PITA. It’s almost as if they come from the factory aimed directly up into oncoming drivers’ eyes. They’re even worse in a mega-pickup, where the headlights are already sitting high, right at your eye level. You have to look away from the road to avoid being blinded.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Posting Junkie
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: UK
Status:
Offline
|
|
BMW used to charge £800 per light for a £20 halogen lamp bulb.
Apple's memory and SSD prices are basically an idiot tax. Always have been.
|
I have plenty of more important things to do, if only I could bring myself to do them....
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Thorzdad
Effin’ LED headlights on an approaching car are such a PITA. It’s almost as if they come from the factory aimed directly up into oncoming drivers’ eyes. They’re even worse in a mega-pickup, where the headlights are already sitting high, right at your eye level. You have to look away from the road to avoid being blinded.
Are these factory LED, or after market ?
Factory should be calibrated right, but Sith after market shit, all bets are off.
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
The blue cast from LED headlights in my rear view mirror always makes me think it’s the cops.
Speaking of LEDs, though, I put in super bright LED replacement bulbs on the inside today, and those are awesome.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Nobletucky
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by turtle777
Are these factory LED, or after market ?
Factory should be calibrated right, but Sith after market shit, all bets are off.
-t
The pickups are definitely new factory lights. Can’t say about the cars, but given they generally seem to be newish expensive rides, I would assume they’re factory.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Aquapel back on the windows, and all is right with the world again.
I truly hated driving in the rain once it wore off. I guess I’m stuck with it for life.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Iowa, how long can this be? Does it really ruin the left column spacing?
Status:
Offline
|
|
Now that you mention it I've been annoyed at my wipers kind of sucking and was thinking about getting new ones, but I probably just need to recoat the windshield.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Even though these are less than three months old, I got new blades anyways.
I’m sure the lack of coating was part of it, but I got stuck in a blizzard a couple weeks back, and there was constant ice buildup on the wipers. I was ripping two-inch thick chunks off them during pit stops. They’ve been smeary ever since.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Professional Poster
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Southern California
Status:
Offline
|
|
Options are overpriced but in the case of my GTI, the stock halogens are garbage so I gladly payed up for the LED ones.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by Laminar
My conspiracy theory is that they occasionally purposely take you down the wrong road just because they want data on that road.
They hit me hard with it this morning. It tried to take me 7 or 8 miles out of my way.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: inside 128, north of 90
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yesterday I got directions to a dunkin. The walking directions went straight there, but the driving directions had me go a wide loop around. I thought, oh, that road must not cut through. Afterward, i found out it totally did cut through. Also it brought me to a grocery dunkin not a real dunkin.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Less conspiratorial... Waze often has a deal where when I start up, it’s confused what direction I’m pointing.
When this happens, it’ll often just calculate a totally new route in that direction rather than spin me around the block to the most reasonable path.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by subego
Less conspiratorial... Waze often has a deal where when I start up, it’s confused what direction I’m pointing.
Do other map apps not have this issue ?
GPS doesn’t provide information like that, and I’m not sure mapping apps utilize the gyroscope data of a cell phone.
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
They could very well. I only use Waze in the car.
However, I’m more pointing out even if it has no idea, it still won’t spin me around the block.
For example, I need to go one block west to get on the interstate. If Waze thinks I’m pointing east, instead of turning me around, it takes me 4 miles down the road to the next on-ramp.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Here’s the actual example.
If I’m at the red dot, Waze should try to get me on the interstate via Dundee Ave. If I’m pointing in the wrong direction (east), it should take me around the block.
Instead, it takes me to the on-ramp by Shoe Factory Road.
As an aside, I love Shoe Factory Road, because it’s named exactly what it is.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
I didn’t know you ventured out in the north-west burbs. You’re in my neck of the woods.
Elgin is great for tacos.
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
What’s your go to? El Paraiso?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by subego
What’s your go to? El Paraiso?
For tacos, very close to where you were.
Taqueria Los Comales on Dundee Ave.
Chances are, you’ll be the only non-Mexican there :-)
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
I’ll check it out!
I usually get roped in by the Beef Villa, which Siri pronounces “Beef Veeya”.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by subego
Beef Villa, which Siri pronounces “Beef Veeya”.
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by turtle777
Do other map apps not have this issue ?
GPS doesn’t provide information like that, and I’m not sure mapping apps utilize the gyroscope data of a cell phone.
-t
iPhones have a compass, and at least Apple Maps does use it to figure out which way you’re looking. It then assumes that you’re facing the windscreen.
|
The new Mac Pro has up to 30 MB of cache inside the processor itself. That's more than the HD in my first Mac. Somehow I'm still running out of space.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: inside 128, north of 90
Status:
Offline
|
|
MA passed a handsfree law that went into effect. Anyone recommend a decent iphone holder? I would rather not use the kind that snaps into a heat vent... unless they don't block heat?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: planning a comeback !
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by P
iPhones have a compass, and at least Apple Maps does use it to figure out which way you’re looking. It then assumes that you’re facing the windscreen.
If you have your cell phone mounted upright, it doesn’t really work.
Or if you use carplay, and place your phone randomly in the car, it wouldn’t get it right either.
-t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: Apr 2000
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by turtle777
If you have your cell phone mounted upright, it doesn’t really work.
Or if you use carplay, and place your phone randomly in the car, it wouldn’t get it right either.
-t
If it is mounted absolutely vertically, then sure. And CarPlay would make it not work, but if you need to guess because the car isn’t moving, it is as good a guess as any. It will ignore the compass when it starts moving.
|
The new Mac Pro has up to 30 MB of cache inside the processor itself. That's more than the HD in my first Mac. Somehow I'm still running out of space.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2020
Status:
Offline
|
|
America's funniest auto mechanics take calls from weary car owners all over the country and crack wise while they diagnose Dodges and dismiss Daihatsu. You don't have to know anything about cars to love this one-hour weekly laugh fest.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior User
Join Date: Jul 2020
Status:
Offline
|
|
Anybody driven a model 3 yet?
(
Last edited by MacNNFamous; Jul 17, 2020 at 11:51 AM.
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Rock
Status:
Offline
|
|
Yup. It’s nice. QC and fit and feel are below the price bracket and I personally like more tactile buttons. But you’re paying for that power plant and it’s pretty awesome.
|
Mankind's only chance is to harness the power of stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by ShortcutToMoncton
Yup. It’s nice. QC and fit and feel are below the price bracket and I personally like more tactile buttons. But you’re paying for that power plant and it’s pretty awesome.
According to Monroe & Associates Tesla is improving production quality with every new model. The model Y is supposedly a marked step up as compared with the model 3.
|
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Irvine, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
I own a model 3 performance model and love it. Instant acceleration is great. New over the air features are good also. Keeps the car fresh.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Addicted to MacNN
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: The Rock
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by OreoCookie
According to Monroe & Associates Tesla is improving production quality with every new model. The model Y is supposedly a marked step up as compared with the model 3.
Really? Google shows a list of articles about the super terrible QC in the model Y—Tesla was shipping cars with seats not attached and bumpers falling off. “Ship now, fix later” sounds like the motto according to online articles, anyway.
Regardless, compared to an ICE of equal price, the Model 3 is definitely weaker when it comes to overall QC. But you get that amazing EV power train!
|
Mankind's only chance is to harness the power of stupid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by ShortcutToMoncton
Really?
Yes, although the important keyword you should not omit from my quote is improvements. Have a look at these videos Munroe and Associates did. If you are a car nerd, you will love these videos. Munroe and Associates are experts in assessing production methods in the automotive and other industries. Sandy Munroe was on a number of podcasts, and his teardown of the Model 3 was quite harsh in many parts. But if you look at the trends, Tesla seems to be improving much more quickly than expected in terms of QC, and is 5-10 years ahead of the competition when it comes to some areas (such as electronics).
Originally Posted by ShortcutToMoncton
Google shows a list of articles about the super terrible QC in the model Y—Tesla was shipping cars with seats not attached and bumpers falling off. “Ship now, fix later” sounds like the motto according to online articles, anyway.
Tesla is behind, but apparently, they are fixing things by changing entire parts and such. You could look at it in a glass half-full kinda way (like you did) or you could take the optimistic route and say that they are improving over time. IMHO Tesla's aggressive changes to production are part of the reason why they have been improving quality more quickly than the traditional players might have expected. For example, the teardown of the Model Y revealed that some parts were changed substantially compared with the Model 3 and usually for the better.
PS I should mention I am not a Tesla fanboy, quite the opposite. To me the future of transportation in cities are a combination of bicycles and public transport. Unless something dramatic changes in my life, I don't think I will ever own another car. (I might occasionally rent one, though.) Nevertheless, I am interested in this topic as a technology geek.
(
Last edited by OreoCookie; Jul 21, 2020 at 02:54 AM.
)
|
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mac Enthusiast
Join Date: Mar 2012
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by OreoCookie
Yes, although the important keyword you should not omit from my quote is improvements.
I’m confused. I didn’t omit anything from your quote.
Have a look at these videos Munroe and Associates did. If you are a car nerd, you will love these videos. Munroe and Associates are experts in assessing production methods in the automotive and other industries. Sandy Munroe was on a number of podcasts, and his teardown of the Model 3 was quite harsh in many parts. But if you look at the trends, Tesla seems to be improving much more quickly than expected in terms of QC, and is 5-10 years ahead of the competition when it comes to some areas (such as electronics).
I feel that we’re talking about slightly different things. You’re talking about production methods. But I was talking about QC—quality control. You can have a great production process but if someone doesn’t bother to bolt down a seat and there’s no process to check that, then the QC is bad.
Tesla is behind, but apparently, they are fixing things by changing entire parts and such.
I mean, my statement was simply an absolute one: of you purchase a Model 3 or a comparatively priced BMW, Audi, Lexus, Acura or other luxury brand, my experience has been that the other models feel more well-built and luxurious.
You could look at it in a glass half-full kinda way (like you did) or you could take the optimistic route and say that they are improving over time.
Hmmm? “I do not think it means, what you think it means.”
IMHO Tesla's aggressive changes to production are part of the reason why they have been improving quality more quickly than the traditional players might have expected. For example, the teardown of the Model Y revealed that some parts were changed substantially compared with the Model 3 and usually for the better.
I agree.
PS I should mention I am not a Tesla fanboy, quite the opposite. To me the future of transportation in cities are a combination of bicycles and public transport. Unless something dramatic changes in my life, I don't think I will ever own another car. (I might occasionally rent one, though.) Nevertheless, I am interested in this topic as a technology geek.
I’m a big biker guy but in significant portions of North America, no one is biking for 4 months a year—it’s either too hot or too cold. Public transit is very important but at least in North America can also be inconvenient, typically pretty slow unless you’re in a specific location, is still fairly expensive, and has recently been discovered as a germ factory.
I love owning a car. It means freedom to get up and go somewhere any time I want to do so. The convenience factor is fantastic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: California
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by The Final Shortcut
I’m a big biker guy but in significant portions of North America, no one is biking for 4 months a year—it’s either too hot or too cold. Public transit is very important but at least in North America can also be inconvenient, typically pretty slow unless you’re in a specific location, is still fairly expensive, and has recently been discovered as a germ factory.
Lots of people in sardine cans on wheels artistic & comfortable enclosed spaces result in lost work and hospital admissions. Not to mention the occasional person who relieved themselves somewhere in the vehicle.
Public transport in NA makes sense in many city locations (outside of pandemics) but isn't a good option for perhaps half the population. I agree on the bicycles part too - summer often goes above 100F (~40C) here. Winter is better unless you live in a northern state - snow complicates things.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by The Final Shortcut
I’m confused. I didn’t omit anything from your quote.
No, you did not misquote me, sorry about that. But I read you response as arguing that the Model Y does have bad quality control, which wasn't my argument. I merely said that Tesla has been improving quality with each successive model — which doesn't mean it's all hunky dory now.
Originally Posted by The Final Shortcut
I feel that we’re talking about slightly different things. You’re talking about production methods. But I was talking about QC—quality control. You can have a great production process but if someone doesn’t bother to bolt down a seat and there’s no process to check that, then the QC is bad.
I don't think we are. (Really, have a look at the videos. If you love cars and technology, I'm sure you'll find them enjoyable.)
The point of improving production processes is to avoid quality problems in the first place by making it easier for factory workers to install parts. Or to reduce the number of parts, which reduces complexity, which in turn reduces steps in the assembly processes where errors may occur. But they also did gap measurements and the like as one way to assess quality (albeit with a sample size of N = 2, they did get their hands on another Model Y just to compare). Plus, Munroe makes educated guesses why in some places the quality is off.
Originally Posted by The Final Shortcut
I mean, my statement was simply an absolute one: of you purchase a Model 3 or a comparatively priced BMW, Audi, Lexus, Acura or other luxury brand, my experience has been that the other models feel more well-built and luxurious.
Not just feel, when it comes to things like interior and fit and finish, they are better built. But looking at the speed of progress Tesla is making, I feel that time is running out for them.
If they had followed the playbook suggested by Munroe, they'd be effed already: he suggested that they start by outsourcing production to someone like Magna and have them help with the body design. This way they would have started with competitive quality and a power train and electronics that was at least 5 years ahead of the competition.
Originally Posted by The Final Shortcut
I’m a big biker guy but in significant portions of North America, no one is biking for 4 months a year—it’s either too hot or too cold. Public transit is very important but at least in North America can also be inconvenient, typically pretty slow unless you’re in a specific location, is still fairly expensive, and has recently been discovered as a germ factory.
I love owning a car. It means freedom to get up and go somewhere any time I want to do so. The convenience factor is fantastic.
If I were living in the US, I'd probably have a car, too. I just wanted to emphasize that I'm not a Tesla fanboy.
(
Last edited by OreoCookie; Jul 22, 2020 at 01:56 AM.
)
|
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by reader50
Public transport in NA makes sense in many city locations (outside of pandemics) but isn't a good option for perhaps half the population. I agree on the bicycles part too - summer often goes above 100F (~40C) here. Winter is better unless you live in a northern state - snow complicates things.
Whether or not cycling is feasible is largely a question of infrastructure. Japan has very hot and humid summers, too, yet people keep on cycling. And in Nordic countries, people keep on cycling even if there is tons of snow on the ground. Especially electrically assisted bikes open up a whole lot of possibilities for many people, including making longer and faster journeys.
|
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Jun 2000
Location: California
Status:
Offline
|
|
I had literally not seen an electric bike until a commercial a month ago. That would extend the operating environment, assuming they have good range. But what about rain? ie - while it would work, it makes the driver unhappy. And going faster is worse, not better.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Moderator
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hilbert space
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by reader50
I had literally not seen an electric bike until a commercial a month ago. That would extend the operating environment, assuming they have good range. But what about rain? ie - while it would work, it makes the driver unhappy. And going faster is worse, not better.
You adapt. We have our rainy season in Japan right now and many people cycle with an umbrella (which I hate). Others have a full-body rain cape or waterproof pants. I just wear one of two rain coats (a light, breathable one when I can get away with it, and a 100 % waterproof one when I cannot). In many jurisdictions the electric motor shuts off at 25 km/h (that is the case in the EU, although I don't know about Japan), so this reduces the risk when crashes occur. In the US the limit is much higher.
You are right that there is a learning curve. In countries where the cycling infrastructure isn't ideal, you get problems because even old people are suddenly very quick on their bikes. But once you have been to the Netherlands, you know this is a completely solvable problem. Ikea even rents out special bikes with which — I kid you not — you can transport furniture.
I have seen people transport entire sofas with one of these. They also have cycling highways that are used just like regular highways. Of course, the typical distances are smaller, but on these smaller distances (for e. g. shopping and the like) you really are faster on a bike. Electric bikes extend the range where you are faster.
Cycling has all sorts of ancillary benefits (especially physical and mental health benefits — people who cycle a lot suffer less from depression) and cycling infrastructure is cheaper. Now of course, if you are living in the countryside and you need to drive 45 minutes to the grocery store, then cycling is probably not an option for you. But if you are even in a semi-urban environment, it is an option IMHO.
(
Last edited by OreoCookie; Jul 22, 2020 at 04:18 AM.
)
|
I don't suffer from insanity, I enjoy every minute of it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clinically Insane
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Chicago, Bang! Bang!
Status:
Offline
|
|
Originally Posted by OreoCookie
Dag is Anders... Anders is Dag
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2000
Location: Irvine, CA
Status:
Offline
|
|
QC for my Model 3 is fine. No issues at all, besides some basic software quirks. Case in point is when I had to reset my car this morning before I could enter my pin.
Only real flaws are some design flaws such as when opening the trunk and water from the windshield (after a rainy day) falls into the trunk. You got to be careful so that the water spills into the channel directly above the trunk line.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forum Rules
|
|
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
|
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|